Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of tableware size in households of children and adolescents with obesity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Portion size influences energy intake and is an important factor when developing weight management strategies. The effect of tableware on food intake is less clear, especially in children. To date, the relationship between the body weight of individuals and the tableware used in their households has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the sizes of tableware in households of children and adolescents with obesity (OBE) in comparison to participants with normal-weight matched for age and gender (NW).

Methods

60 OBE (32 female, 26 male) and 27 NW (12 female, 15 male) aged between 9 and 17 years participated in a structured interview on the tableware used at home. Responses were standardized based on the selection of different sizes of tableware and everyday objects presented to the children.

Results

In households of NW, larger plates and bowls were used during meals and desserts compared to OBE. OBE drank out of larger bottles. Shapes and sizes of drinkware, the number of children drinking out of bottles and the cutlery used during dessert did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions

Drinking out of large bottles may be an unfavourable habit of OBE if they contain sugar-rich liquids. The use of smaller plates and bowls of OBE may result in multiple helpings being consumed and so contribute to an overall increased portion size.

Level of evidence

Level V, Descriptive study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM (2006) Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 444(7121):840–846. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Lewis HB, Wei Y, Higgins JP, Ogilvie D (2015) Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD011045. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DiSantis KI, Birch LL, Davey A, Serrano EL, Zhang J, Bruton Y, Fisher JO (2013) Plate size and children’s appetite: effects of larger dishware on self-served portions and intake. Pediatrics 131(5):e1451–e1458. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wansink B, van Ittersum K, Payne CR (2014) Larger bowl size increases the amount of cereal children request, consume, and waste. J Pediatr 164(2):323–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.09.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Ittersum K, Wansink B (2013) Extraverted children are more biased by bowl sizes than introverts. PLoS One 8(10):e78224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wansink B, van Ittersum K (2003) Bottoms up! The Influence of elongation on pouring and consumption volume. J Consum Res 30(3):455–463. https://doi.org/10.1086/378621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher JO, Birch LL, Zhang J, Grusak MA, Hughes SO (2013) External influences on children’s self-served portions at meals. Int J Obes (Lond) 37(7):954–960. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wansink B, Payne C, Werle C (2008) Consequences of belonging to the “clean plate club”. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 162(10):994–995. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.162.10.994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wansink B, Wansink CS (2010) The largest Last Supper: depictions of food portions and plate size increased over the millennium. Int J Obes (Lond) 34(5):943–944. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wansink B (2010) From mindless eating to mindlessly eating better. Physiol Behav 100(5):454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.05.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wansink B, van Ittersum K, Painter JE (2006) Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. Am J Prev Med 31(3):240–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wansink B, Cheney MM (2005) Super Bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption. Jama 293(14):1727–1728. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.14.1727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS (2007) Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 49(3):652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.04.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah M, Schroeder R, Winn W, Adams-Huet B (2011) A pilot study to investigate the effect of plate size on meal energy intake in normal weight and overweight/obese women. J Hum Nutr Diet 24(6):612–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01210.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yip W, Wiessing KR, Budgett S, Poppitt SD (2013) Using a smaller dining plate does not suppress food intake from a buffet lunch meal in overweight, unrestrained women. Appetite 69:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raghubir P, Krishna A (1999) Vital dimensions in volume perception: can the eye fool the stomach? J Mark Res 36(3):313–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wansink B, van Ittersum K (2005) Shape of glass and amount of alcohol poured: comparative study of effect of practice and concentration. Bmj 331(7531):1512–1514. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1512

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sauer H, Krumm A, Weimer K, Horing B, Mazurak N, Gulewitsch MD, Hellmond F, Dammann D, Binder W, Linse P, Zipfel S, Ehehalt S, Binder G, Demircioglu A, Muth ER, Enck P, Mack I (2014) PreDictor research in obesity during medical care—weight Loss in children and adolescents during an INpatient rehabilitation: rationale and design of the DROMLIN study. J Eat Disord 2:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-2-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Wabitsch M, Kunze D, Geller F, Geiß HC, Hesse V, von Hippel A, Jaeger U, Johnsen D, Korte W, Menner K, Müller G, Müller JM, Niemann-Pilatus A, Remer T, Schaefer F, Wittchen H-U, Zabransky S, Zellner K, Ziegler A, Hebebrand J (2001) Perzentile für den Body Mass Index für das Kindes- und Jugendalter unter Heranziehung verschiedener deutscher Stichproben. Monatschrift Kinderheilkunde 149(8):807–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001120170107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diehl JM (1999) Attitude to eating and body weight by 11- to 16-year-old adolescents. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 129(5):162–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 57(1):289–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biro G, Hulshof KF, Ovesen L, Amorim Cruz JA (2002) Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 56(Suppl 2):S25–S32. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/ejcn/1601426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Elfhag K, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F (2010) Family links of eating behaviour in normal weight and overweight children. Int J Pediatr Obes 5(6):491–500. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477160903497001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wansink B, Payne CR (2007) Counting bones: environmental cues that decrease food intake. Percept Mot Skills 104(1):273–276. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.1.273-276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Libotte E, Siegrist M, Bucher T (2014) The influence of plate size on meal composition. Lit Rev Exp Appet 82:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson E, Sheen F, Harrold J, Boyland E, Halford JC, Masic U (2015) Dishware size and snack food intake in a between-subjects laboratory experiment. Public Health Nutr https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015001408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rolls BJ (2000) The role of energy density in the overconsumption of fat. J Nutr 130(2S Suppl):268S–271S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schusdziarra V, Hausmann M, Wittke C, Mittermeier J, Kellner M, Wagenpfeil S, Erdmann J (2010) Contribution of energy density and food quantity to short-term fluctuations of energy intake in normal weight and obese subjects. Eur J Nutr 49(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-009-0046-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rolls BJ (2014) What is the role of portion control in weight management? Int J Obes (Lond) 38(Suppl 1):S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Throop EM, Skinner AC, Perrin AJ, Steiner MJ, Odulana A, Perrin EM (2014) Pass the popcorn: “obesogenic” behaviors and stigma in children’s movies. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22(7):1694–1700. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gaina A, Sekine M, Chandola T, Marmot M, Kagamimori S (2009) Mother employment status and nutritional patterns in Japanese junior high schoolchildren. Int J Obes (Lond) 33(7):753–757. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rolls BJ (2010) Plenary Lecture 1: Dietary strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity. Proc Nutr Soc 69(1):70–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665109991674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Geier AB, Rozin P, Doros G (2006) Unit bias. A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake. Psychol Sci 17(6):521–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01738.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mishra A, Mishra H, Masters TM (2012) The influence of bite size on quantity of food consumed: a field study. J Consum Res 38(5):791–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/660838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson E, Almiron-Roig E, Rutters F, de Graaf C, Forde CG, Tudur Smith C, Nolan SJ, Jebb SA (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of eating rate on energy intake and hunger. Am J Clin Nutr 100(1):123–151. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.081745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferriday D, Bosworth ML, Lai S, Godinot N, Martin N, Martin AA, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM (2015) Effects of eating rate on satiety: a role for episodic memory? Physiol Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.038

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ritze Y, Bardos G, D’Haese JG, Ernst B, Thurnheer M, Schultes B, Bischoff SC (2014) Effect of high sugar intake on glucose transporter and weight regulating hormones in mice and humans. PLoS One 9(7):e101702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bray GA, Popkin BM (2014) Dietary sugar and body weight: have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes?: health be damned! Pour on the sugar. Diabetes Care 37(4):950–956. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mack I, Sauer H, Weimer K, Dammann D, Zipfel S, Enck P, Teufel M (2014) Obese children and adolescents need increased gastric volumes in order to perceive satiety. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22(10):2123–2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Birch LL, McPheee L, Shoba BC, Steinberg L, Krehbiel R (1987) “Clean up your plate”: effects of child feeding practices on the conditioning of meal size. Learn Motiv 18:301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(87)90017-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Francis LA, Hofer SM, Birch LL (2001) Predictors of maternal child-feeding style: maternal and child characteristics. Appetite 37(3):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown A, Lee M (2011) Maternal control of child feeding during the weaning period: differences between mothers following a baby-led or standard weaning approach. Matern Child Health J 15(8):1265–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0678-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Grants from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Bad Homburg, Germany (2011_A135) and the “Minigraduiertenprogramm” of the Center for Nutritional Medicine (ZEM), Tübingen-Hohenheim, Germany. IM receives a grant by the Ministry of Science Baden-Württemberg and the European Social Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IM was responsible for conception, funding, design and preparation of the study, data analysis, data interpretation and drafted the paper. HS was responsible for conception and design of the study and acquired data. DD and SZ were responsible for conception and design of the study. PE was responsible for conception, design and funding of the study. KW and MT were involved in data interpretation. All co-authors revised the manuscript. We thank all staff of the Fachkliniken Wangen i. A. for their support in carrying out the study and all colleagues at the University Hospital Tübingen who helped us with planning, implementation and realization. We thank Mr. Riyad Peeraully for reviewing the manuscript as a native English speaker.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Mack.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Mack et al, the children and their parents provided informed consent prior to the children’s participation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mack, I., Sauer, H., Weimer, K. et al. Perceptions of tableware size in households of children and adolescents with obesity. Eat Weight Disord 24, 585–594 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0537-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0537-7

Keywords

Navigation