Orthorexic and restrained eating behaviour in vegans, vegetarians, and individuals on a diet
- 718 Downloads
Orthorexic eating behaviour, restrained eating, and veganism/vegetarianism are food selection strategies sharing several characteristics. Since there are no studies investigating their interrelationships, aim of the present study was to analyse orthorexic and restrained eating behaviour in (1) a sample of vegans and vegetarians and (2) a sample of individuals on a diet to lose weight.
Division of samples according to pre-defined criteria in (1) vegans (n = 114), vegetarians (n = 63), individuals with rare meat consumption (n = 83) and individuals with frequent meat consumption (n = 91) and in (2) participants on a diet with dietary change (n = 104), without dietary change (n = 37) and a control group of individuals not on a diet (n = 258). Orthorexic eating behaviour was assessed with the Düsseldorfer Orthorexie Skala and restrained eating was assessed with the Restraint Eating Scale.
Vegans and vegetarians do not differ in orthorexic eating behaviour, but both groups score higher in orthorexic eating behaviour than individuals consuming red meat. There are no differences regarding restrained eating. Individuals on a diet with dietary change score higher in both orthorexic and restrained eating, than individuals without dietary change and individuals not on a diet.
Individuals who restrict their eating behaviour, either predominantly due to ethical reasons or with the intention to lose weight, display more orthorexic eating behaviour than individuals not limiting their food consumption. Further research is needed to investigate whether veganism, vegetarianism, or frequent dieting behaviour serve as risk factors for orthorexia.
Level of evidence
Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
KeywordsOrthorexia nervosa Restrained eating Vegetarianism Veganism Dieting behaviour
The authors wish to thank Nadezda Stieger and Sina Lavendel for their great help in collecting the data and Hannah Kiesow-Berger for her valuable assistance with language revision.
The studies have not been funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Herman CP, Mack D (1975) Restrained and unrestrained eating. J Pers 43:647–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00727.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bratman S (1997) Orthorexia Essay. https://www.orthorexia.com/original-orthorexia-essay. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
- 12.Moroze RM, Dunn TM, Holland C, Yager J, Weintraub P (2015) Microthinking about micronutrients: a case of transition from obsessions about healthy eating to near-fatal “orthorexia nervosa” and proposed diagnostic criteria. Psychosomatics 56:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2014.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Setnick J (2013) The eating disorders clinical pocket guide, second edition: quick reference for healthcare providers, 2 edn. Understanding Nutrition, DallasGoogle Scholar
- 15.The Vegetarian Society (2017) What is a vegetarian? https://www.vegsoc.org/definition. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
- 17.The Vegan Society (2017) Definition of veganism. https://www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
- 21.Bratman S, Knight D (2000) Health food junkies: overcoming the obsession with healthful eating. Broadway Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 27.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 28.Sandhu MS, White IR, McPherson K (2001) Systematic review of the prospective cohort studies on meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 10:439–446Google Scholar