Psychometric evaluation of the muscle appearance satisfaction scale in a Mexican male sample
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the muscle appearance satisfaction scale (MASS) shows acceptable psychometric properties in Mexican bodybuilders.
A total of 258 Mexican male bodybuilders were recruited. Two self-report questionnaires, including the MASS and drive for muscularity scale (DMS), were administered. Six models of the latent structure of the MASS were evaluated, using confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood, considering robust Satorra–Bentler correction to estimate the fit of the models to the data.
Similar to the original MASS, the series of CFA confirmed that the Mexican version was well represented with the 17-item five-factor structure, which showed a good model fit [Satorra–Bentler Chi-square (109, n = 258) = 189.18, p < 0.0001; NNFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.93; IFI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.05 (0.04, 0.07)]. Internal consistency was estimated with McDonald’s omega, which was acceptable for the MASS (0.88), and their subscales (0.80 to 0.89), except for muscle checking scale (0.77). Test–retest reliability analysis showed stability of the MASS total as well as of the subscale scores over a 2-week period (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.75–0.91). Construct validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation between MASS and DMS results (r = 0.75; p = 0.0001). These results were similar to those of previous studies, which demonstrate the scale’s usefulness.
Our results support the suitability of the MASS and its subscales to measure muscle dysmorphia symptoms in Mexican male bodybuilders.
KeywordsBody image Confirmatory factor analysis Male Muscle dysmorphia
The study was supported by the Grants UAEM (3388/2013ESP and 1002/2012/RCA) to Consuelo Escoto and UNAM-PAPIIT (IN-306615) to Georgina Alvarez-Rayón.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 11.Rhea DJ, Lantz CD, Cornelius AE (2004) Development of the muscle dysmorphia inventory (MDI). J Sports Med Phys Fit 44(4):428–435Google Scholar
- 14.Schmitz JF, Campagnolo P (2013) Características de dismorfia muscular em praticantes de musculação: associação com o consumo alimentar. Braz J Sports Nutr 2(2):1–8Google Scholar
- 22.Almeida SH, Aguiar M, Almeida JH (2008) Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Muscle Appearance Satisfaction Scale (MASS). EFDeportes.com 13(120):1–8Google Scholar
- 26.Bentler PM (2004) EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Satorra A, Bentler PM (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye A, Clogg CC (eds) Latent variables analysis: applications for developmental research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 399–419Google Scholar
- 28.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
- 29.Shumacker RE, Lomax RG (1996) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- 32.McDonald RP (1999) Test theory. A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kline P (1999) The handbook of psychological testing, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 38.Murray SB, Rieger E, Hildebrandt T, Karlov L, Russell J, Boon E, Dawson RT, Touyz SW (2012) A comparison of eating, exercise, shape, and weight related symptomatology in males with muscle dysmorphia and anorexia nervosa. Body Image 9(2):193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar