Abstract
Purpose
Weight stigma involves stereotyping individuals based on body size. Individuals with obesity face weight stigma in many areas of their lives, and consequences can include impairment of mental and physical health, relationships, and academic performance. Weight-stigmatizing messages are pervasive in mass media, but the degree and characteristics of its presence within new-media social environments remain comparatively unknown.
Methods
This study examined weight stigma on Twitter by coding Tweet content that included the word “fat” within a 4-h timeframe (N = 4596). Coding marked demographic characteristics represented in content, messages about weight, and perceived intent of the message.
Results
Of all messages, 56.57 % were negative and 32.09 % were neutral. Of those containing weight-stigmatizing messages (n = 529), themes relating to fatness included: gluttonous (48.58 %), unattractive (25.14 %), not sexually desirable (2.65 %), sedentary (13.80 %), lazy (5.86 %), and stupid (4.16 %).
Conclusions
Weight-stigmatizing messages are evident in the increasingly important arena of social media, and themes appear similar to those that emerge in other forms of media. Prevention and intervention body image programs should consider targeting social networks to help individuals manage societal messages.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
All Tweets quoted in this manuscript were left intact without changes to grammar or content.
References
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA 307:483–490. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.40
Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD (2008) Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995–1996 through 2004–2006. Obesity 16:1129–1134. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.35
Puhl R, Brownell KD (2003) Ways of coping with obesity stigma: review and conceptual analysis. Eat Behav 4:53–78. doi:10.1016/S1471-0153(02)00096-X
Phelan SM, Burgess DJ, Yeazel MW, Hellerstedt WL, Griffin JM, van Ryn M (2015) Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obes Rev 16:319–326. doi:10.1111/obr.12266
Puhl R, Peterson JL, Luedicke J (2013) Fighting obesity or obese persons? Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages. Int J Obes 37:774–782. doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.156
Schwartz MB, Chambliss HO, Brownell KD, Blair SN, Billington C (2003) Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obes Res 11:1033–1039. doi:10.1038/oby.2003.142
Puhl RM, Brownell KD (2006) Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity 14:1802–1815. doi:10.1038/oby.2006.208
Eisenberg ME, Carlson-McGuire A, Gollust SE, Neumark-Sztainer D (2015) A content analysis of weight stigmatization in popular television programming for adolescents. Int J Eat Disord 48:759–766. doi:10.1002/eat.22348
Puhl RM, Peterson JL, DePierre JA, Luedicke J (2013) Headless, hungry, and unhealthy: a video content analysis of obese persons portrayed in online news. J Health Commun 18:686–702. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.743631
Ata RN, Thompson JK (2010) Weight bias in the media: a review of recent research. Obes Facts 3:41–46. doi:10.1159/000276547
Nichter M (2002) Fat talk. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Nichter M, Vuckovic N (1994) Fat talk: Body image among adolescent girls. In: Sault N (ed) Many mirrors. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 109–131
Mutterperl JA, Sanderson CA (2002) Mind over matter: internalization of the thinness norm as a moderator of responsiveness to norm misperception education in college women. Health Psychol 21:519–523. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.5.519
Stice E, Maxfield J, Wells T (2003) Adverse effects of social pressure to be thin on young women: an experimental investigation of the effects of “fat talk”. Int J Eat Disord 34:108–117. doi:10.1002/eat.10171
Latner JD, Rosewall JK, Simmonds MB (2007) Childhood obesity stigma: association with television, videogame, and magazine exposure. Body Image 4:147–155. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.03.002
Salk RH, Engeln-Maddox R (2011) If you’re fat, then I’m humongous! Frequency, content, and impact of fat talk among college women. Psychol Women Q 35:18–28. doi:10.1177/0361684310384107
Kwan GCE, Skoric MM (2013) Facebook bullying: an extension of battles in school. Comput Human Behav 29:16–25. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.014
Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2010) Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res 14:206–221. doi:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, Daciuk J, Solomon S (2010) Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Am J Orthopsychiatry 80:362–374. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01040.x
Mabe AG, Forney KJ, Keel PK (2014) Do you “like” my photo? Facebook use maintains eating disorder risk. Int J Eat Disord 47:516–523. doi:10.1002/eat.22254
Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA, Calvert SL (2009) College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. J Appl Dev Psychol 30:227–238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J (2008) MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav 11:169–174. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056
Chou WY, Prestin A, Kunath S (2014) Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis. Transl Behav Med 4:314–323. doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0256-1
So J, Prestin A, Lee L, Wang Y, Yen J, Chou WYS (2016) What do people like to “share” about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter. Health Commun 31:193–206. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.940675
Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S (2010) What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? International World Wide Web Conference, Raleigh
Berger J, Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral? J Mark Res 49:192–205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353
Inc Twitter (2013) Form S-1 registration statement. United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington
MacDonald Clarke P, Murnen SK, Smolak L (2010) Development and psychometric evaluation of a quantitative measure of “fat talk”. Body Image 7:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.09.006
Wojtowicz AE, von Ranson KM (2007) Word lists for testing cognitive biases toward body shape among men and women. Behav Res Methods 39:151–155. doi:10.3758/BF03192854
Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17:941–964. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.636
Hussin M, Frazier S, Thompson JK (2011) Fat stigmatization on YouTube: a content analysis. Body Image 8:90–92. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.10.003
Gow RW, Lydecker JA, Lamanna JD, Mazzeo SE (2012) Representations of celebrities’ weight and shape during pregnancy and postpartum: a content analysis of three entertainment magazine websites. Body Image 9:172–175. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.07.003
Puhl R, Peterson JL, Luedicke J (2013) Motivating or stigmatizing? Public perceptions of weight-related language used by health providers. Int J Obes 37:612–619. doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.110
Puhl R, Suh Y (2015) Stigma and eating and weight disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 17:552–561. doi:10.1007/s11920-015-0552-6
Norris ML, Boydell KM, Pinhas L, Katzman DK (2006) Ana and the internet: a review of pro-anorexia websites. Int J Eat Disord 39:443–447. doi:10.1002/eat.20305
Jett S, LaPorte DJ, Wanchisn J (2010) Impact of exposure to pro-eating disorder websites on eating behaviour in college women. Eur Eat Disord Rev 18:410–416. doi:10.1002/erv.1009
Geier AB, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD (2003) “Before and after” diet advertisements escalate weight stigma. Eat Weight Disord-Stud Anorex Bulim Obes 8:282–288. doi:10.1007/BF03325027
Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human subjects according to the Office of Human Research Protections' definition of a human subject, § 45 CFR 46.102(f) (i.e., a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or identifiable private information), as all data were retrospective and non-identifiable.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not necessary.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lydecker, J.A., Cotter, E.W., Palmberg, A.A. et al. Does this Tweet make me look fat? A content analysis of weight stigma on Twitter. Eat Weight Disord 21, 229–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0272-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0272-x
Keywords
- Weight stigma
- Content analysis
- Social media
- Prevention