After excluding the 18 overweight participants, the means and standard deviations of height, weight, and BMI for all participants were 171.6 ± 5.7 cm, 61.1 ± 8.5 kg, and 20.7 ± 2.4 kg/m2 in the males, and 157.7 ± 5.5 cm, 50.3 ± 6.5 kg, and 20.2 ± 2.5 kg/m2 in the females, respectively. According to the classification of BSh by BMI, 17.7 % (n = 94) of the participants were underweight, while 82.3 % (n = 436) were normal weight. In the males, 13.1 % (n = 33) of the participants were underweight and 83.3 % (n = 210) were normal weight. In the females, 20.6 % (n = 61) of the participants were underweight and 76.4 % (n = 226) were normal weight.
As shown in Table 1, the weight, BMI, perception of BSh, ideal weight, and ideal BMI were all significantly lower in the underweight participants than in the normal-weight participants, in both the males and females (ideal weight in males, p = 0.001; other index, p < 0.001).
Table 1 Physical status of underweight and normal-weight subjects
Among the females, the perception of ideal BSh was significantly lower in the underweight participants than in the normal-weight participants (p = 0.004). In the group of female normal-weight participants, discrepancies of weight, BMI, and BSh were negative, and significantly lower than those in female underweight participants (all three indexes, p < 0.001). In male underweight participants, discrepancies of weight, BMI, and BSh were positive, and significantly higher than those in male normal-weight participants (all three indexes, p < 0.001). Among all of the underweight participants, the males’ values for height, weight, ideal height, ideal weight, ideal BMI, ideal BSh, discrepancy of height, discrepancy of weight, discrepancy of BMI, and discrepancy of BSh were significantly larger as compared to the females (p < 0.05). Similarly, among all of the normal-weight participants, the males’ values for height, weight, ideal height, ideal weight, ideal BMI, ideal BSh, discrepancy of height, discrepancy of weight, discrepancy of BMI, and discrepancy of BSh were significantly larger as compared to the females (p < 0.05).
The DEBQ scores for restrained, emotional, and external eating were significantly higher in the females than in the males (all three scores: p < 0.001). In addition, as shown in Table 2, the restrained eating values were lower in the underweight participants than in the normal-weight participants in both males and females (males, p = 0.003; females, p < 0.001). Among all of the underweight participants, the females had significantly higher restrained eating and external eating scores as compared to the males (p < 0.05). Among all of the normal-weight participants, the females had significantly higher restrained, emotional, and external eating scores as compared to the males (p < 0.05). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.91 for restrained eating, 0.95 for emotional eating, and 0.79 for external eating.
Table 2 DEBQ scores of underweight and normal-weight subjects
Discrepancies in height, weight, BMI, and BSh between the participants’ current data and their ideal values are shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed that there was a significant interaction effect between gender and height discrepancy (F = 61.7, p < 0.001). Both gender and height discrepancy had a significant main effect on height. After a post hoc test, both height and ideal height in the males were significantly higher than in the females. The ideal heights of both the males and females were significantly higher than their current heights.
The two-way repeated measures ANOVA also revealed a significant interaction effect between gender and weight discrepancy (F = 214.7, p < 0.001). Both gender and weight discrepancy had a significant main effect on weight. After a post hoc test, weight and ideal weight in males were significantly larger than in the females. The ideal weight values were significantly larger than the current weight values in the males, whereas in the females, the ideal weight values were significantly smaller than the current weight values.
A significant interaction effect between gender and BMI discrepancy (F = 158.5, p < 0.001) was also observed. Both gender and BMI discrepancy had a significant main effect on BMI. After a post hoc test, the current BMI and ideal BMI were significantly larger in the males than in the females. In the males, the ideal BMI values were significantly larger than the BMI values, whereas in the females the ideal BMI values were significantly smaller than the BMI values.
There was also a significant interaction effect between gender and BSh discrepancy (F = 163.2, p < 0.001). Both gender and BSh discrepancy had a significant main effect on BSh. After a post hoc test, the ideal BSh values reported by the males were significantly larger than those reported by the females. In the females, the ideal BSh was significantly smaller than body shape.
BMI was significantly positively correlated with the score of restrained and external eating in males (restrained eating: r = 0.213, p = 0.001; external eating: r = 0.183, p = 0.004). In females, BMI was significantly positively correlated with the score of restrained and emotional eating (restrained eating: r = 0.217, p < 0.001; emotional eating: r = 0.148, p = 0.012).
Table 3 shows the results of our multiple linear regression analysis between the DEBQ scores and the discrepancies of weight, BMI and perception of BSh, adjusting for height. In the males, restrained eating was significantly negatively associated with the discrepancy of weight (β = − 0.185, p = 0.005), the discrepancy of BMI (β = − 0.363, p < 0.001), and the discrepancy of BSh (β = − 0.455, p < 0.001). External eating was negatively associated with the discrepancy of BMI (β = − 0.124, p = 0.049).
Table 3 DEBQ scores and discrepancy of physical index
Among the females, restrained eating was negatively associated with the discrepancy of weight (β = − 0.159, p = 0.007), the discrepancy of BMI (β = − 0.236, p < 0.001), and the discrepancy of BSh (β = − 0.276, p < 0.001). Emotional eating was negatively associated with the discrepancy of BMI (β = − 0.145, p = 0.023) and the discrepancy of BSh (β = − 0.157, p = 0.015).