Skip to main content
Log in

The Case for Simple Simulation: Stochastic Market Simulation to Assess Renewable Business Cases

  • Published:
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper argues that, for the purpose of determining business cases for renewable energy assets, simple simulation methods can be very valuable. We demonstrate this through the application of a stochastic agent-based energy market model which, instead of a modelling the explicit drivers behind future investments, treats future capacity levels as stochastic parameters.

Recent Findings

In the last decade, increasingly complex models have been proposed to analyze the interaction between investment in and operation of energy assets by multiple market participants under uncertainty. This includes multi-stage optimization, equilibrium, and agent-based models. These models have their uses but are often not directly suitable for informing real-world investment analysis. They still do not capture all relevant uncertainties and features of real-world investment decision-making, are difficult to interrogate and explain to non-technical decision-makers, and have a high computational cost.

Summary

We have applied a newly developed stochastic energy market simulator, EYE, to the Dutch energy system, to demonstrate the usefulness of a simpler approach. We find that being able to easily include a wide range of uncertainties has clear value, as there are important interactions between uncertainties. We also note that results from a modelling exercise like this are easily explainable, and can help decision-makers. We suggest that future research into energy systems models needs to focus not just on complexity, but also on simplicity and the needs of real-world decision-makers, without losing sight of the multi-level nature of energy system investment. Choices between adding more specific realism and simplifying to allow for, e.g., capturing a broader range of uncertainties need to be made much more explicitly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

 The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Pieter Verstraten, upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Note that the Dutch system has limited storage, so storage operation does not appreciably change prices.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. TNO. Financing the energy transition in The Netherlands: the important role of institutional investors. Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Den Haag, 2020. 875816. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:8bcb5424-7edf-4850-bed8-9b5e885e0e02. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  2. Deng X, Lv T. Power system planning with increasing variable renewable energy: a review of optimization models. J Clean Prod. 2020;246:118962.

  3. Lopion P, Markewitz P, Robinius M and Stolten D. A review of current challenges and trends in energy systems modeling. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;96:156–66. (This paper gives a comprehensive overview of energy systems modelling approaches, and how these have evolved. It also sets out a research agenda, making a case for more flexible models.).

  4. van der Weijde AH and Hobbs BF. The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty.  Energy Econ. 2012;43(6):2089–101.

  5. Ambrosius M, Egerer J, Grimm V and van der Weijde AH. Uncertain bidding zone configurations: the role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion. Eur J Oper Res. 2020;285(1):343–59.

  6. Kallabis T, Gabriel SA and Weber C. Strategic generation investment using a stochastic rolling-horizon MPEC approach. Energy Syst. 2020.

  7. Kraan O, Kramer G-J and Nikolic I. Investment in the future electricity system - an agent-based modelling approach. Energy. 2018;151:569–80.

  8. Tao Z, Moncada JA, Poncelet K and Delarue E. Review and analysis of investment decision making algorithms in long-term agent-based electric power system simulation models. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;136:110405. (This paper provides an overview and evaluation of agent-based power system simulation models. Unlike previous reviews, it focuses specifically on models which include investment decisions.).

  9. Klosterman R. Simple and complex models. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2012;39:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Priesmann J, Nolting L and Praktiknjo A. Are complex energy system models more accurate? An intra-model comparison of energy system optimization models. Appl Energy. 2019;255:113783.

  11. Hunter K, Sreepathi S, DeCarolis JF. Modeling for insight using Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis (Temoa). Energy Econ. 2013;40:339–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotzur L, Nolting L, Hoffmann M, Groß T, Smolenko A, Priesmann J, Büsing H, Beer R, Kullmann F, Singh B, Praktiknjo A, Stolten D, Robinius M. A modeler’s guide to handle complexity in energy systems optimization. Adv Appl Energy. 2021;4:100063. (For readers whose specific problem settings require more detail than our methods can give, this paper gives a complete and highly concrete set of actions to choosing the right level of complexity in models.).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quintel. Energy transition model. [Online]. Available: https://energytransitionmodel.com/. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  14. Wang R, Ye Z, Lu M, Hsu S-C. Understanding post-pandemic work-from-home behaviours and community level energy reduction via agent-based modelling. Appl Energy. 2022;322:119433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Olivella-Rosell P, Villafafila-Robles R, Sumper A, Bergas-Jané J. Probabilistic agent-based model of electric vehicle charging demand to analyse the impact on distribution networks. Energies. 2015;8(5):4160–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Weijde AH, Hajonides van der Meulen T, Clisby L and Verstraten P. D3.2: Individual and system risks in hydrogen value chains: methodology and case studies​. HyDelta, 2023. https://zenodo.org/record/7907223.  Accessed 1 June 2023.

  17. de Kler R, van de Beek F and van der Veen A. D5.2.6 ROADMAP for the introduction of a low carbon industry in the Rotterdam Region. ELEGANCY, 2020. https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/elegancy/deliverables/elegancy_d5.2.6_roadmap_low-carbon-industry_rotterdam.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  18. van Aken B, Verstraten P, Kaas B and Cesar I. Variation in PV system configuration’s generation profiles have marginal effect on price stabilization in the Netherlands compared to deployment of flexible demand and supply. Solar RRL. 2022;6(5).

  19. HyXchange. Spot market simulation (H2SMS). 2023. [Online]. Available: https://hyxchange.nl/spot-market-simulation/. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  20. PBL. Klimaat-en Energieverkenning 2022. Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, Den Haag, 2022.

  21. Hawker G and Bell K. Making energy system models useful: good practice in the modelling of multiple vectors. WIREs Energy Environ. 2019;9 no. 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pieter Verstraten.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verstraten, P., van der Weijde, A.H. The Case for Simple Simulation: Stochastic Market Simulation to Assess Renewable Business Cases. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 10, 75–81 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-023-00216-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-023-00216-3

Keywords

Navigation