Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Review on Water-Energy-Greenhouse Gas Nexus of the Bioenergy Supply and Production System

  • Sustainable and Renewable Energy (SE Hosseini, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Tremendous global pressures like resource depletion and climate change urge us to deploy alternate energy sources and to integrate carbon capture and sequestration processes. Biomass can be considered as one of the alternate renewable carbon-based fuels that can decrease environmental footprints in different applications. There is currently a lack of systematic review of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water-energy nexus (WEN) in the biomass supply chains’ system (BSCs) system. Therefore, the present study aims to conduct a comprehensive review of the studies carried out into WEN and GHG emissions regarding the BSCs. The published papers investigated in this study were categorized and evaluated based on their objectives, methodologies, geographic scales, and environmental sustainability factors.

Recent Findings

The review revealed that not only literatures lack enough research into WEN and GHG, but also the capacity for effectively assessing the relationships between water, energy, and the trend of GHG emissions at a higher resolution. In addition, it was found that most of the previous studies have mainly focused on the economic influences of BSCs and mathematical methods for the optimization of BSCs. There is a need for the development of a mathematical dynamic model considering uncertainties and the multi-objective approaches to evaluate the trend of WEN and GHG in the BSCs.

Summary

To achieve a sustainable development of the BSCs, WEN and GHG emissions need to be effectively managed. The findings of the present paper will assist researchers who work on renewable energy issues and potential users of the bioenergy industry to obtain a deeper understanding of the current state of knowledge in terms of WEN and GHG emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

WEN:

Water-energy nexus

SC:

Supply chain

BSCs:

Biomass supply chains

MILP:

Mixed-integer linear programming

LCA:

Life cycle analyses

CSP:

Concentrated solar power

References

  1. Unicef D. Annual report 2012: United Nations Children’s Fund, The (UNICEF); 2013.

  2. Zahraee SM, Khalaji Assadi M, Saidur R. Application of artificial intelligence methods for hybrid energy system optimization. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;66:617–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamiche AM, Stambouli AB, Flazi S. A review of the water-energy nexus. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;65:319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy L, Garrido A, Juana L. Evaluation of Spain’s water-energy nexus. Int J Water Resourc Dev. 2012;28(1):151–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gleick PH. Water and energy. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 1994;19(1):267–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan C, Zhi Q. The energy-water nexus: a literature review of the dependence of energy on water. Energy Procedia. 2016;88:277–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Connor, R. (2015). The United Nations world water development report 2015: water for a sustainable world (Vol. 1). UNESCO publishing.

  8. Conti J, Holtberg P, Diefenderfer J, LaRose A, Turnure JT, Westfall L. International energy outlook 2016 with projections to 2040: USDOE Energy Information Administration (EIA). Washington DC: United States; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Pardoe J, Conway D, Namaganda E, Vincent K, Dougill AJ, Kashaigili JJJCP. Climate change and the water–energy–food nexus: insights from policy and practice in Tanzania. Clim Pol. 2018;18(7):863–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mdee AJWA. Disaggregating orders of water scarcity-the politics of nexus in the Wami-Ruvu River Basin. Tanzania. 2017;10(1):100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amanatidis G. European policies on climate and energy towards 2020, 2030 and 2050. 2019. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bargshady G, Zahraee SM, Ahmadi M, Parto A. The effect of information technology on the agility of the supply chain in the Iranian power plant industry. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2016;27(3):427–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2015-0093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zahraee SM, Mokhtar AA, Tolooie A, Asri NAM. Performance evaluation of EFB biomass supply chain for electricity power generation based on computer simulation: Malaysia case study. Adv Mater Sci Eng Springer. 2020:363–75.

  14. Nair S, George B, Malano HM, Arora M, Nawarathna B. Water–energy–greenhouse gas nexus of urban water systems: review of concepts, state-of-art and methods. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014;89:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Endo A, Tsurita I, Burnett K, Orencio PM. A review of the current state of research on the water, energy, and food nexus. J Hydrol. 2017;11:20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Endo A, Burnett K, Orencio PM, Kumazawa T, Wada CA, Ishii A, et al. Methods of the water-energy-food nexus. Water. 2015;7(10):5806–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keairns DL, Darton RC, Irabien A. The energy-water-food nexus. Ann Rev Chem Biomole Eng. 2016;7(1):239–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-033539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kucukvar M, Cansev B, Egilmez G, Onat NC, Samadi H. Energy-climate-manufacturing nexus: new insights from the regional and global supply chains of manufacturing industries. Appl Energy. 2016;184:889–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Granit JJ, King RM, Noël R. Strategic environmental assessment as a tool to develop power in transboundary water basin settings. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev (IJSESD). 2011;2(4):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weitz N, Strambo C, Kemp-Benedict E, Nilsson M. Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: insights from integrative governance. Glob Environ Chang. 2017;45:165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klein SJ, Rubin ES. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, water and land use for concentrated solar power plants with different energy backup systems. Energy Policy. 2013;63:935–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bieber N, Ker JH, Wang X, Triantafyllidis C, van Dam KH, Koppelaar RH, et al. Sustainable planning of the energy-water-food nexus using decision making tools. Energy Policy. 2018;113:584–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shastri Y. Renewable energy, bioenergy. Curr Opinion Chem Eng. 2017;17:42–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao J, You F. Optimal design and operations of supply chain networks for water management in shale gas production: MILFP model and algorithms for the water-energy nexus. AICHE J. 2015;61(4):1184–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez-Hernandez E, Samsatli S. Biorefineries and the food, energy, water nexus—towards a whole systems approach to design and planning. Curr Opinion Chem Eng. 2017;18:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. López PR, Galán SG, Reyes NR, Jurado F. A method for particle swarm optimization and its application in location of biomass power plants. Int J Green Energy. 2008;5(3):199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan K-Y, Lin Y-C, Chiueh P-T, Lo S-L. Spatial optimization of the food, energy, and water nexus: a life cycle assessment-based approach. Energy Policy. 2018;119:502–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaharudin MS, Fernando Y, Jabbour CJC, Sroufe R, Jasmi MFA. Past, present, and future low carbon supply chain management: a content review using social network analysis. J Clean Prod. 2019;218:629–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Chen B, Guan C, Zhang B. Evolution of methane emissions in global supply chains during 2000–2012. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;150:104414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guan S, Han M, Wu X, Guan C, Zhang B. Exploring energy-water-land nexus in national supply chains: China 2012. Energy. 2019;185:1225–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zahraee SM, Mamizadeh F, Vafaei SA. Greening assessment of suppliers in automotive supply chain: an empirical survey of the automotive industry in Iran. Glob J Flex Syst Manag. 2018;19(3):225–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0189-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zahraee SM, Golroudbary SR, Shiwakoti N, Kraslawski A, Stasinopoulos P. An investigation of the environmental sustainability of palm biomass supply chains via dynamic simulation modeling: a case of Malaysia. J Clean Prod. 2019;237:117740.

  33. Ayoub N, Elmoshi E, Seki H, Naka Y. Evolutionary algorithms approach for integrated bioenergy supply chains optimization. Energy Convers Manag. 2009;50(12):2944–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Leduc S, Natarajan K, Dotzauer E, McCallum I, Obersteiner M. Optimizing biodiesel production in India. Appl Energy. 2009;86(Supplement 1):S125–S31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zamboni A, Bezzo F, Shah N. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 2. multi-objective environmental optimization. Energy Fuel. 2009;23(10):5134–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9004779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zamboni A, Shah N, Bezzo F. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 1. cost minimization. Energy Fuel. 2009;23(10):5121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Čuček L, Lam HL, Klemeš JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z. Synthesis of regional networks for the supply of energy and bioproducts. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2010;12(6):635–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0312-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mele FD, Kostin AM, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Jiménez L. Multiobjective model for more sustainable fuel supply chains. a case study of the sugar cane industry in Argentina. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50(9):4939–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101400g.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. You F, Wang B. Life cycle optimization of biomass-to-liquid supply chains with distributed–centralized processing networks. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50(17):10102–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200850t.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. Supply chain design and capacity planning: from first to second generation biofuel systems. Chem Eng Transact. 2011;24:253–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. You F, Tao L, Graziano DJ, Snyder SW. Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis. AICHE J. 2012;58(4):1157–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Čuček L, Varbanov PS, Klemeš JJ, Kravanja Z. Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains. Energy. 2012;44(1):135–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yue D, Slivinsky M, Sumpter J, You F. Sustainable design and operation of cellulosic bioelectricity supply chain networks with life cycle economic, environmental, and social optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53(10):4008–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403882v.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bairamzadeh S, Pishvaee MS, Saidi-Mehrabad M. Multiobjective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable bioethanol supply chain design under multiple uncertainties. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;55(1):237–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roni MS, Eksioglu SD, Cafferty KG, Jacobson JJ. A multi-objective, hub-and-spoke model to design and manage biofuel supply chains. Ann Oper Res. 2017;249(1–2):351–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Santibañez-Aguilar JE, Morales-Rodriguez R, González-Campos JB, Ponce-Ortega JM. Stochastic design of biorefinery supply chains considering economic and environmental objectives. J Clean Prod. 2016;136(Part B):224–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Azadeh A, Vafa AH. Biodiesel supply chain optimization via a hybrid system dynamics-mathematical programming approach. Renew Energy. 2016;93:383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Miret C, Chazara P, Montastruc L, Negny S, Domenech S. Design of bioethanol green supply chain: comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria. Comput Chem Eng. 2016;85:16–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cambero C, Sowlati T. Incorporating social benefits in multi-objective optimization of forest-based bioenergy and biofuel supply chains. Appl Energy. 2016;178:721–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fattahi M, Govindan K. A multi-stage stochastic program for the sustainable design of biofuel supply chain networks under biomass supply uncertainty and disruption risk: a real-life case study. Transport Res Part E. 2018;118:534–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chávez MMM, Sarache W, Costa Y. Towards a comprehensive model of a biofuel supply chain optimization from coffee crop residues. Transport Res Part E. 2018;116:136–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Galanopoulos C, Barletta D, Zondervan E. A decision support platform for a bio-based supply chain: application to the region of Lower Saxony and Bremen (Germany). Comput Chem Eng. 2018;115:233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tsao Y-C, Thanh V-V, Lu J-C, Yu V. Designing sustainable supply chain networks under uncertain environments: fuzzy multi-objective programming. J Clean Prod. 2018;174:1550–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Roni MS, Thompson DN, Hartley DS. Distributed biomass supply chain cost optimization to evaluate multiple feedstocks for a biorefinery. Appl Energy. 2019;254:113660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Radcliffe JC. The water energy nexus in Australia–the outcome of two crises. Water-Energy Nexus. 2018;1(1):66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhuang Y. A system dynamics approach to integrated water and energy resources management. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the postgraduate research stipend scholarship provided by the RMIT University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mojib Zahraee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cell Behavior Manipulation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zahraee, S.M., Shiwakoti, N. & Stasinopoulos, P. A Review on Water-Energy-Greenhouse Gas Nexus of the Bioenergy Supply and Production System. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 7, 28–39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-020-00147-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-020-00147-3

Keywords

Navigation