Toward Deep-Decarbonization: an Energy-Service System Framework
Purpose of Review
This paper reviews the historical and applied literature on energy transitions from an integrated system-level framework. We synthesize the literature using a simple energy-service system framework to highlight the main problems and possible pathways for a transition to a decarbonized energy system.
Recent literature suggests that the combination of demand-pull and technology-push policy instruments will be necessary to tip markets in favor of low-carbon energy alternatives. These studies illustrate that complex feedback mechanisms between the different components of an energy system, such as lock-in and push-back, complicate prescriptive policy design.
The transition to a decarbonized energy system is one of the most pressing problems facing modern society. Energy systems are complex systems with many layers of feedback between social, technical, and institutional systems. Given these complexities, policy design and analysis must evolve to incorporate these feedbacks more explicitly.
KeywordsDeep-decarbonization Energy transition Path dependency Multi-level perspective Energy-economy models Energy economics
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance ••Of major importance
- 1.IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Edenhofer 0R, Pichs-Madruga Y, Sokona E, Farahani S, Kadner K, et al, editors. Climate Change 2014, Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York; 2014. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf.
- 3.Grubb M, Jamasb T, Pollitt MG. Delivering a low carbon electricity system: technologies. Economics and Policy: Cambridge University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
- 4.Foxon T, Köhler J, Oughton C. (2008) Innovation for a low carbon economy: economic, institutional and management approaches [Internet]. Edward Elgar Publishing; [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=njsFDQi5ZVcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Innovation+for+a+Low+Carbon+Economy:+Economic,+Institutional+and+Management&ots=KCok9HdTkS&sig=9K28l7VKUPB5qe46TrwvLg50r7M
- 6.Jaccard M. Hybrid energy-economy models and endogenous technological change. In: Loulou R, Waaub J-P, Zaccour G, editors. Energy Environ. [Internet]. US: Springer; 2005. p. 81–109. [cited 2017 May 1]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-25352-1_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Grubler A, Wilson C, Nemet G. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2016;22:18–25. Good review arguing the need for consistency in definitions and measurements of energy transitions to avoid apples-and-oranges comparisons CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Smil V. Examining energy transitions: a dozen insights based on performance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016;22:194–7. Good analysis of a shift from a fossil fuel based energy supply system to one based on biofuels and intermittent electricity generation from renewable sources arguing the transition will the process will span decades or generations CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Schot J. The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. Hist. Technol. Int. J 1998;14:173–200.Google Scholar
- 32.Beinhocker ED. (2006) The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics [Internet]. Harvard Business Press; [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eUoolrxSFy0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=The+Origin+of+Wealth:+Evolution,+Complexity+and+the+Radical+Remaking+of+Economics&ots=Sl5gFp3a-g&sig=RGmgbRUzm0nHr_zsVSWewZM7n-Q
- 34.Smil V. Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects [Internet]. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers; 2010. [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vLuT4BS_25MC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Smil+energy+transitions&ots=_CKzVBDS87&sig=KpEmaZ8I7ffWuMyJkhcn3bTGp9Y Google Scholar
- 35.Moreno-Cruz J, Taylor MS. (2013) A spatial approach to energy economics [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research; Mar. Report No.: 18908. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18908
- 38.Knittel CR, Metaxoglou K, Trindade A. (2015) Natural gas prices and coal displacement: evidence from electricity markets [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Report No.: 21627. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w21627
- 39.Moreno-Cruz J, Taylor MS. (2012) Back to the future of green powered economies [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Jul. Report No.: 18236. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18236
- 41.Alperson-Afil N, Sharon G, Kislev M, Melamed Y, Zohar I, Ashkenazi S, et al. Spatial organization of hominin activities at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov. Israel Science. 2009;326:1677–80.Google Scholar
- 43.Severnini ER. (2014). The power of hydroelectric dams: agglomeration spillovers [Internet]. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Report No.: 8082. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp8082.html
- 47.Nef JU. (1977) Early energy crisis and its consequences. Sci AmUnited States 237 [Internet] [cited 2017 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/5454783
- 48.Allen RC. The British industrial revolution in global perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/printpdf/review/943 Google Scholar
- 56.Snow D. (2004) Extraordinary efficiency growth in response to new technology entries: the carburetor’s “last gasp”. Acad. Manag. Proc. [Internet]. Academy of Management, [cited 2017 Jan 6]. p. K1–K6. Available from: http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2004/1/K1.1.short
- 60.•• Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Hanley D, Kerr W. Transition to clean technology. J Polit Econ. 2016;124:52–104. Great analysis of optimal policy for a low carbon transition in the presence of directed technical change using a microeconomic model of endogenous growth. Finds that optimal policy requires both heavy research subsidies in addition to carbon taxes CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.•• Meng KC. (2016) Estimating path dependence in energy transitions [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22536 Great empirical analysis of path dependency in the US electricity sector, finding strong path dependency and the need for a stronger shock than currently observed by natural gas in order to overcome coal-fired electricity. Additionally argues the potential detriment of a transition to natural gas if a future transition to cleaner fuel sources is needed due to similar path dependency under natural gas.
- 69.• van Benthem AA. Energy leapfrogging. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ [Internet]. 2015;2:93–132. [cited 2017 Jan 6]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/680317 Good empirical analysis of leapfrogging in less-developed countries, finding that energy savings from improved energy efficiency at an equivalent level of economic growth have led to less-developed countries being about as energy-intensive as historical industrialized countries Google Scholar
- 70.• Lee K, Miguel E, Wolfram C. Appliance ownership and aspirations among electric grid and home solar households in rural Kenya. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106:89–94. Good paper arguing that since power supplied by home solar systems do not scale with demand, home solar may not be a viable substitute for the electric grid in developing countries, but this may not be a large environmental detriment as grid power is not primarily fueled by fossil-fuels. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Aghion P, Howitt P, Mayer-Foulkes D. (2004) The effect of financial development on convergence: theory and evidence [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10358
- 74.Lovely M, Popp D. Trade, technology and the environment: why do poorer countries regulate sooner. NBER Work Pap. 2008;14286:1529–38.Google Scholar
- 76.Acemoglu D, Robinson J. (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty [Internet]. Crown Business. [cited 2017 Jan 9]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yIV_NMDDIvYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA7&dq=Why+Nations+Fail&ots=_-VtYvomPC&sig=hD6r9efTd7dhlQ9B2F7Xlw8o2IQ
- 79.Manne AS. ETA: a model for energy technology assessment. Bell J Econ. 1976:379–406.Google Scholar
- 80.Rivers N, Jaccard M. Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to energy-economy modeling using discrete choice methods. Energy J. 2005:83–106.Google Scholar
- 82.Greening L, Bataille C. Bottom-up models of energy: across the spectrum. Int. Handb. Econ. Energy [internet]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285953159_Bottom-up_models_of_energy_Across_the_spectrum Google Scholar
- 84.Schäfer A, Jacoby HD. Experiments with a hybrid CGE-MARKAL model. Energy J. 2006:171–7.Google Scholar
- 87.Böhringer C, Rutherford TF, Wiegard W. (2004) Computable general equilibrium analysis: opening a black box. [cited 2017 May 1]; Available from: https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/363/
- 90.Coulomb L, Neuhoff K. (2006) Learning curves and changing product attributes: the case of wind turbines [cited 2017 Jan 6]; Available from: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/131662
- 95.• Sovacool BK. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016;13:202–15. A good article that is critical of the current view of energy transitions and their speed in the literature. The authors suggest more transparent definitions may improve understanding of energy transitions and the complexity of their driving forces CrossRefGoogle Scholar