Purpose of Review
This paper reviews the historical and applied literature on energy transitions from an integrated system-level framework. We synthesize the literature using a simple energy-service system framework to highlight the main problems and possible pathways for a transition to a decarbonized energy system.
Recent literature suggests that the combination of demand-pull and technology-push policy instruments will be necessary to tip markets in favor of low-carbon energy alternatives. These studies illustrate that complex feedback mechanisms between the different components of an energy system, such as lock-in and push-back, complicate prescriptive policy design.
The transition to a decarbonized energy system is one of the most pressing problems facing modern society. Energy systems are complex systems with many layers of feedback between social, technical, and institutional systems. Given these complexities, policy design and analysis must evolve to incorporate these feedbacks more explicitly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance ••Of major importance
IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Edenhofer 0R, Pichs-Madruga Y, Sokona E, Farahani S, Kadner K, et al, editors. Climate Change 2014, Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York; 2014. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf.
Holdren JP. The energy innovation imperative: addressing oil dependence, climate change, and other 21st century energy challenges. innovations. 2006;1:3–23.
Grubb M, Jamasb T, Pollitt MG. Delivering a low carbon electricity system: technologies. Economics and Policy: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Foxon T, Köhler J, Oughton C. (2008) Innovation for a low carbon economy: economic, institutional and management approaches [Internet]. Edward Elgar Publishing; [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=njsFDQi5ZVcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Innovation+for+a+Low+Carbon+Economy:+Economic,+Institutional+and+Management&ots=KCok9HdTkS&sig=9K28l7VKUPB5qe46TrwvLg50r7M
Xu M, Crittenden JC, Chen Y, Thomas VM, Noonan DS, Desroches R, et al. Gigaton problems need gigaton solutions 1. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:4037–41.
Jaccard M. Hybrid energy-economy models and endogenous technological change. In: Loulou R, Waaub J-P, Zaccour G, editors. Energy Environ. [Internet]. US: Springer; 2005. p. 81–109. [cited 2017 May 1]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-25352-1_4 .
Mundaca L, Neij L, Worrell E, McNeil M. Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2010;35:305–44.
Grübler A, Nakićenović N, Victor DG. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy. 1999;27:247–80.
Grubler A. Energy transitions research: insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy. 2012;50:8–16.
Grubler A, Wilson C, Nemet G. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2016;22:18–25. Good review arguing the need for consistency in definitions and measurements of energy transitions to avoid apples-and-oranges comparisons
Smil V. Examining energy transitions: a dozen insights based on performance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016;22:194–7. Good analysis of a shift from a fossil fuel based energy supply system to one based on biofuels and intermittent electricity generation from renewable sources arguing the transition will the process will span decades or generations
Geels FW. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 2002;31:1257–74.
Kallis G, Norgaard RB. Coevolutionary ecological economics. Ecol Econ. 2010;69:690–9.
Foxon TJ. A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecol Econ. 2011;70:2258–67.
Van den Bergh JC. Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. J Evol Econ. 2007;17:521–49.
Geels FW. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2005;17:445–76.
Verbong G, Geels F. The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy. 2007;35:1025–37.
Shackley S, Green K. A conceptual framework for exploring transitions to decarbonised energy systems in the United Kingdom. Energy. 2007;32:221–36.
Bennett SJ, Pearson PJ. From petrochemical complexes to biorefineries? The past and prospective co-evolution of liquid fuels and chemicals production in the UK. Chem Eng Res Des. 2009;87:1120–39.
Schot J. The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. Hist. Technol. Int. J 1998;14:173–200.
Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 1998;10:175–98.
Smith A, Voß J-P, Grin J. Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Res Policy. 2010;39:435–48.
Unruh GC. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy. 2000;28:817–30.
Unruh GC. Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy. 2002;30:317–25.
Unruh GC, Carrillo-Hermosilla J. Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy. 2006;34:1185–97.
Turnheim B, Geels FW. Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy. 2012;50:35–49.
Geels FW, Schot J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy. 2007;36:399–417.
Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy. 2005;34:1491–510.
Geels FW. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy. 2010;39:495–510.
Geels FW. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2011;1:24–40.
Popp D. Innovation and climate policy. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2010;2:275–98.
Beinhocker ED. (2006) The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics [Internet]. Harvard Business Press; [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eUoolrxSFy0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=The+Origin+of+Wealth:+Evolution,+Complexity+and+the+Radical+Remaking+of+Economics&ots=Sl5gFp3a-g&sig=RGmgbRUzm0nHr_zsVSWewZM7n-Q
Fouquet R. The slow search for solutions: lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service. Energy Policy. 2010;38:6586–96.
Smil V. Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects [Internet]. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers; 2010. [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vLuT4BS_25MC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Smil+energy+transitions&ots=_CKzVBDS87&sig=KpEmaZ8I7ffWuMyJkhcn3bTGp9Y
Moreno-Cruz J, Taylor MS. (2013) A spatial approach to energy economics [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research; Mar. Report No.: 18908. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18908
Rutter P, Keirstead J. A brief history and the possible future of urban energy systems. Energy Policy. 2012;50:72–80.
Allen RC. Backward into the future: the shift to coal and implications for the next energy transition. Energy Policy. 2012;50:17–23.
Knittel CR, Metaxoglou K, Trindade A. (2015) Natural gas prices and coal displacement: evidence from electricity markets [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Report No.: 21627. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w21627
Moreno-Cruz J, Taylor MS. (2012) Back to the future of green powered economies [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Jul. Report No.: 18236. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18236
Alperson-Afil N. Continual fire-making by hominins at Gesher Benot Ya ‘aqov. Israel Quat Sci Rev. 2008;27:1733–9.
Alperson-Afil N, Sharon G, Kislev M, Melamed Y, Zohar I, Ashkenazi S, et al. Spatial organization of hominin activities at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov. Israel Science. 2009;326:1677–80.
Liu W, Spaargaren G, Heerink N, Mol AP, Wang C. Energy consumption practices of rural households in north China: basic characteristics and potential for low carbon development. Energy Policy. 2013;55:128–38.
Severnini ER. (2014). The power of hydroelectric dams: agglomeration spillovers [Internet]. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Report No.: 8082. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp8082.html
Turnbull G. Canals, coal and regional growth during the industrial revolution. Econ Hist Rev. 1987;40:537–60.
Gagnon L. Civilisation and energy payback. Energy Policy. 2008;36:3317–22.
Madureira NL. The iron industry energy transition. Energy Policy. 2012;50:24–34.
Nef JU. (1977) Early energy crisis and its consequences. Sci AmUnited States 237 [Internet] [cited 2017 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/5454783
Allen RC. The British industrial revolution in global perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. [cited 2016 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/printpdf/review/943
Galloway JA, Keene D, Murphy M. Fuelling the city: production and distribution of firewood and fuel in London’s region, 1290–14001. Econ Hist Rev. 1996;49:447–72.
Rudge J. Coal fires, fresh air and the hardy British: a historical view of domestic energy efficiency and thermal comfort in Britain. Energy Policy. 2012;49:6–11.
Fouquet R. Divergences in long-run trends in the prices of energy and energy services. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2011;5:196–218.
Fouquet R. The demand for environmental quality in driving transitions to low-polluting energy sources. Energy Policy. 2012;50:138–49.
Sovacool BK. Conceptualizing urban household energy use: climbing the “energy services ladder”. Energy Policy. 2011;39:1659–68.
Arthur WB. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J. 1989;99:116–31.
Sovacool BK. Rejecting renewables: the socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States. Energy Policy. 2009;37:4500–13.
Snow D. (2004) Extraordinary efficiency growth in response to new technology entries: the carburetor’s “last gasp”. Acad. Manag. Proc. [Internet]. Academy of Management, [cited 2017 Jan 6]. p. K1–K6. Available from: http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2004/1/K1.1.short
Adner R, Snow D. Old technology responses to new technology threats: demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Ind Corp Change. 2010;19:1655–75.
Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D. The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev. 2012;102:131–66.
Grubb M, Köhler J, Anderson D. Induced technical change in energy and environmental modeling: analytic approaches and policy implications. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 2002;27:271–308.
•• Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Hanley D, Kerr W. Transition to clean technology. J Polit Econ. 2016;124:52–104. Great analysis of optimal policy for a low carbon transition in the presence of directed technical change using a microeconomic model of endogenous growth. Finds that optimal policy requires both heavy research subsidies in addition to carbon taxes
•• Meng KC. (2016) Estimating path dependence in energy transitions [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22536 Great empirical analysis of path dependency in the US electricity sector, finding strong path dependency and the need for a stronger shock than currently observed by natural gas in order to overcome coal-fired electricity. Additionally argues the potential detriment of a transition to natural gas if a future transition to cleaner fuel sources is needed due to similar path dependency under natural gas.
Lanjouw JO, Mody A. Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res Policy. 1996;25:549–71.
Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag. 2003;45:278–93.
Popp D. International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO 2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. J Environ Econ Manag. 2006;51:46–71.
Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resour Econ. 2010;45:133–55.
Popp D. They don’t invent them like they used to: an examination of energy patent citations over time. Econ Innov New Technol. 2006;15:753–76.
Energy Information Administration. International energy outlook 2016 [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration; 2016. p. 1–276. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/0484 (2016).pdf
Rubio MM, Folchi M. Will small energy consumers be faster in transition? Evidence from the early shift from coal to oil in Latin America. Energy Policy. 2012;50:50–61.
• van Benthem AA. Energy leapfrogging. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ [Internet]. 2015;2:93–132. [cited 2017 Jan 6]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/680317 Good empirical analysis of leapfrogging in less-developed countries, finding that energy savings from improved energy efficiency at an equivalent level of economic growth have led to less-developed countries being about as energy-intensive as historical industrialized countries
• Lee K, Miguel E, Wolfram C. Appliance ownership and aspirations among electric grid and home solar households in rural Kenya. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106:89–94. Good paper arguing that since power supplied by home solar systems do not scale with demand, home solar may not be a viable substitute for the electric grid in developing countries, but this may not be a large environmental detriment as grid power is not primarily fueled by fossil-fuels.
Hilton FH. Later abatement, faster abatement: evidence and explanations from the global phase out of leaded gasoline. J Environ Dev. 2001;10:246–65.
Aghion P, Howitt P, Mayer-Foulkes D. (2004) The effect of financial development on convergence: theory and evidence [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10358
Karakosta C, Doukas H, Psarras J. Technology transfer through climate change: setting a sustainable energy pattern. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2010;14:1546–57.
Lovely M, Popp D. Trade, technology and the environment: why do poorer countries regulate sooner. NBER Work Pap. 2008;14286:1529–38.
Saikawa E, Urpelainen J. Environmental standards as a strategy of international technology transfer. Environ Sci Pol. 2014;38:192–206.
Acemoglu D, Robinson J. (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty [Internet]. Crown Business. [cited 2017 Jan 9]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yIV_NMDDIvYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA7&dq=Why+Nations+Fail&ots=_-VtYvomPC&sig=hD6r9efTd7dhlQ9B2F7Xlw8o2IQ
Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Zilibotti F. Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2006;4:37–74.
Gerschenkron A. Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays [Internet]. MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge; 1962. Available from: http://www.eh.net/?s=Economic+backwardness
Manne AS. ETA: a model for energy technology assessment. Bell J Econ. 1976:379–406.
Rivers N, Jaccard M. Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to energy-economy modeling using discrete choice methods. Energy J. 2005:83–106.
Böhringer C, Rutherford TF. Combining bottom-up and top-down. Energy Econ. 2008;30:574–96.
Greening L, Bataille C. Bottom-up models of energy: across the spectrum. Int. Handb. Econ. Energy [internet]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285953159_Bottom-up_models_of_energy_Across_the_spectrum
Rivers N, Jaccard M. Choice of environmental policy in the presence of learning by doing. Energy Econ. 2006;28:223–42.
Schäfer A, Jacoby HD. Experiments with a hybrid CGE-MARKAL model. Energy J. 2006:171–7.
Fujimori S, Masui T, Matsuoka Y. Development of a global computable general equilibrium model coupled with detailed energy end-use technology. Appl Energy. 2014;128:296–306.
Cai Y, Newth D, Finnigan J, Gunasekera D. A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation. Appl Energy. 2015;148:381–95.
Böhringer C, Rutherford TF, Wiegard W. (2004) Computable general equilibrium analysis: opening a black box. [cited 2017 May 1]; Available from: https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/363/
Bennett SJ. Using past transitions to inform scenarios for the future of renewable raw materials in the UK. Energy Policy. 2012;50:95–108.
Qiu Y, Anadon LD. The price of wind power in China during its expansion: technology adoption, learning-by-doing, economies of scale, and manufacturing localization. Energy Econ. 2012;34:772–85.
Coulomb L, Neuhoff K. (2006) Learning curves and changing product attributes: the case of wind turbines [cited 2017 Jan 6]; Available from: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/131662
Söderholm P, Klaassen G. Wind power in Europe: a simultaneous innovation–diffusion model. Environ Resour Econ. 2007;36:163–90.
Jacobsson S, Bergek A. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind. Corp. Change. 2004;13:815–49.
Kemp R. The Dutch energy transition approach. Int Econ Econ Policy. 2010;7:291–316.
Pearson PJ, Foxon TJ. A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy. 2012;50:117–27.
• Sovacool BK. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016;13:202–15. A good article that is critical of the current view of energy transitions and their speed in the literature. The authors suggest more transparent definitions may improve understanding of energy transitions and the complexity of their driving forces
Leach G. The energy transition. Energy Policy. 1992;20:116–23.
Jagger N, Foxon T, Gouldson A. Skills constraints and the low carbon transition. Clim Policy. 2013;13:43–57.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Energy Policy
About this article
Cite this article
Blackburn, C., Harding, A. & Moreno-Cruz, J. Toward Deep-Decarbonization: an Energy-Service System Framework. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 4, 181–190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-017-0088-y
- Energy transition
- Path dependency
- Multi-level perspective
- Energy-economy models
- Energy economics