Water for Energy: Systems Integration and Analysis to Address Resource Challenges
Purpose of Review
Water for the energy sector is an interdisciplinary challenge that requires new integrated systems knowledge, well-documented case studies that test various decision processes, and both quantitative and qualitative modeling and analyses to support sustainable decision-making. This review paper highlights water requirements of the energy sector and summarizes interdisciplinary research opportunities for sustainable and efficient management of water for energy, and new datasets to inform analysis of water policies and programs affecting energy systems.
The energy sector depends closely on water resources for primary fuels production (including extraction or cultivation, processing, and refining) and electric power generation in thermoelectric and hydroelectric power plants. While research in these areas has advanced significantly in recent years, questions remain regarding water quality and quantity impacts of emerging technologies and policies in the water-energy sectors, potential for use of alternative water resources, impact of energy portfolio transitions, and tools to aid decision-making under uncertainty.
Water is essential for energy production and power generation processes. Projected transitions in energy portfolios and water for energy policy hold the potential to both mitigate or exacerbate water stress, therefore motivating a critical need for systems integration and analysis approaches that can guide the development of cost-effective, resource-efficient, and resilient systems and services.
KeywordsEnergy-water nexus Electric power generation Power plant cooling Oil and gas production Hydraulic fracturing
This research was supported by the Texas A&M WEF Nexus initiative.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Ashlynn S. Stillwell, Ahmed M. Mroue, Joshua B. Sperling, Tyler Hussey, David Burnett, and Michael E. Webber declare no conflicts of interest.
Joshua D. Rhodes is an equity partner in IdeaSmiths LLC, which consults on topics in the same areas of interests. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Texas at Austin in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.
Margaret A. Cook reports her recent employment with Apache Corporation as of May 30, 2017.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Associated Press. Drought could shut down nuclear power plants. January 23, 2008. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22804065/ns/weather/t/drought-could-shut-down-nuclear-power-plants/#.WLYt1hjMyqA.
- 2.California Energy Commission. Drought Impacts California’s Energy; Governor Brown’s Response Plan (Executive Order B-29-15). http://www.energy.ca.gov/drought/.
- 3.O’Grady E. Drought adds to 2012 Texas power supply worry. October 18, 2011. http://www.reuters.com/article/utilities-texas-drought-idAFN1E79H1L620111018.
- 4.Walsh B. How climate change and the monsoons affect India’s blackouts. July 31, 2012. http://science.time.com/2012/07/31/how-climate-change-and-the-monsoons-affect-indias-blackouts/.
- 5.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.
- 6.Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2016 Early Release: Annotated Summary of Two Cases. U.S. Department of Energy. http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/er/pdf/0383er(2016).pdf.
- 10.Twomey KM, Beal CM, King CW, Webber ME. Biofuels: an energy and water conundrum. World Energy Monitor 2012:3.Google Scholar
- 11.• Lampert DJ, Cai H, Elgowainy A. Wells to wheels: water consumption for transportation fuels in the United States. Energy Environ Sci 2016:vol:pp. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03254g. This paper reports updated life-cycle water consumption results for a wide range of transportation fuels.
- 12.Maupin MA. Kenny JF, Hutson SS, Lovelace JK, Barber NL, Linsey KS. Estimated use of water in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1405 2014.Google Scholar
- 13.Solley WB, Pierce RP, Perlman HA. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1200 1998.Google Scholar
- 15.Department of Energy, 2014. Secretary science and energy on the water-energy nexus: challenges and opportunities. Department of Energy Available at http://energy.gov/under-secretary-science-and-energy/downloads/water-energy-nexus-challenges-and-opportunities.
- 20.• van Vliet MTH, Wiberg D, Leduc S, Riahi K. Power-generation system vulnerability and adaptation to changes in climate and water resources. Nat Clim Chang. 2016; doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2903. This paper examines the climate change impacts on hydroelectric and thermoelectric power plants globally.
- 25.Hanlon, P., Madel, R., Olson-Sawyer, K., Rabin, K., & Rose, J. (2013). Food, water and energy: know the nexus, 32. Retrieved from http://gracelinks.org/1828/food-water-and-energy-know-the-nexus.
- 28.Environmental Protection Agency. Scoping materials for initial design of EPA research study on potential relationships between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water resources. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency; 2010. Available at https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/0/3B745430D624ED3B852576D400514B76/$File/Hydraulic+Frac+Scoping+Doc+for+SAB-3-22-10+Final.pdf Google Scholar
- 32.Nicot JP, Reedy RC, Costley RA, Huang Y. Oil & gas water use in Texas: update to the 2011 mining water use report. Jackson School of Geosciences and The University of Texas at Austin: Bureau of Economic Geology; 2012.Google Scholar
- 33.Gallegos, T. J., Bern, C. R., Birdwell, J. E., Haines, S. S., & Engle, M. (2015). The role of water in unconventional in situ energy resource extraction technologies. Food, energy, and water: the chemistry connection, edited by Ahuja S., editor, 183–215.Google Scholar
- 34.•• Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Nicot JP. Comparison of water use for hydraulic fracturing for unconventional oil and gas versus conventional oil. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:12386–93. doi: 10.1021/es502506v. This paper provides a detailed comparison of water use for production of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.National Energy Technology Laboratory. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants Volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. 2013 DOE/NETL-2010/1397.Google Scholar
- 44.C. Kutscher, Gladden, C. (2006). Wet-dry cooling for power plants, Parabolic Trough Technology Workshop, Incline Village, Nevada, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2006.Google Scholar
- 45.Thermosyphon Cooler Hybrid System for Water Savings in Power Plants, Technology Insights: A Report from EPRI’s Innovation Scouts, 2012.Google Scholar
- 46.Western Resource Advocates. (2011). Every Drop Counts - Valuing the Water Used to Generate Electricity. Western Resource Advocates.Google Scholar
- 51.EPRI. Water & Sustainability (Volume 3): U.S. Water Consumption for Power Production—The Next Half Century. Electric Power Research Institute 2002. Report 1006786.Google Scholar
- 53.Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Department of the Interior, History of the Clean Water Act 2012. https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/history-clean-water-act.
- 60.Williams, E. D. and J. E. Simmons. (2013). Water in the energy industry: an introduction. BP International Ltd. http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/sustainability/group-reports/BP-ESC-water-handbook.pdf.
- 61.Water Constraints on Energy Production: Altering our Current Collision Course, Synapses Energy Economics Civil Society Institute, 2013.Google Scholar
- 62.EPA: “Data gaps” block verdict on fracking, drinking water. (2016, December 13). Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://fuelfix.com/blog/2016/12/13/epa-data-gaps-block-verdict-on-fracking-drinking-water/.
- 64.Gray D. 25-year agreement allows Denver to reduce Shoshone water right. Post Independent January 9, 2007. http://www.postindependent.com/news/25-year-agreement-allows-denver-to-reduce-shoshone-water-right/.
- 66.Ferrell SL, Adams DC, Kizer MA, Engle DM, Ott C. The Oklahoma Water Law Handbook. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service E-10106.Google Scholar
- 80.Proposed Resolution by the California State Lands Commission Regarding Once-through Cooling in California Power Plants, Technical Report, California State Lands Commission, 2006.Google Scholar
- 82.Engström RE, Howells M, Destouni G, Bhatt V, Bazilian M, Rogner HH. Connecting the resource nexus to basic urban service provision—with focus on water-energy interactions in New York City. Sustain Cities Soc. 2017; doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.007.
- 86.King, C.; Stillwell, A.; Twomey, K.; Webber, M. (2013). Coherence between water and energy policies. Natural Resources Journal 53(1), 117-[iv].Google Scholar
- 87.Hussey K, Pittock J. The energy-water nexus: managing the links between energy and water for a sustainable future. Ecol Soc. 2012;17(1) doi: 10.5751/ES-04641-170131.