The liberalization process of European gas markets has shown how pivotal is the role of both balancing mechanisms and flexibility instruments. Before the liberalization, in fact, these activities were perceived as being very technical. A growing body of literature, instead, has demonstrated how decentralized and market-oriented forms of managing both issues is crucial for achieving well-functioning and liquid wholesale markets. The aim of our paper is precisely to show how the evolution of theoretical models, coupled with findings from empirical investigations, has provided scientific justifications for the introduction of market-oriented rules by regulators and policy makers. At present, to achieve a fully integrated European market, the Energy Union policy framework has to attain one last final target: the harmonization and integration of balancing and flexibility mechanisms among markets, particularly with the expected increase in intermittent generation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
From Keyaerts et al.  “system integrity” is defined as “each situation of a transport system where the pressure [and the quality of the natural gas] remain within the lower and upper limits set by the system operator such that the transport of natural Gas is guaranteed”.
For example, the number of the so-called flow against price differential events in North Western Europe has been rather volatile in recent years but significantly decreased in the third quarter of 2015.
ACER. Framework guidelines on gas balancing in transmission systems. 2011. Published on 18 October 2011.
Arvesen Ø, Medbø V, Fleten S-E, Tomasgard A, Westgaard S. Linepack storage valuation under price uncertainty. Energy. 2015;52:155–64.
CEER. CEER final vision on regulatory arrangements for the gas storage market. 2014. Published on 25 May 2015.
Cretì A, Villeneuve B. Gas storage and security of supply. In: Cretì A, editor. The economics of natural gas storage. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
DG Energy (2016) European Gas Market Quarterly Report, Volume 9 (issue 1; fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016)
Glachant JM, Hallack M, Vazquez M. Building competitive gas markets in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013.
Hunt P. Entry–exit transmission pricing with notional hubs: can it deliver a Pan-European wholesale market in gas? 2008. OIES NG 23(February).
Keyaerts N, Hallack M, Glachant JM, D’Haeseleer W. Gas market distorting effects of imbalanced gas balancing rules: inefficient regulation of pipeline flexibility. Energy Pol. 2011;39:865–76.
Keyaerts N, Meeus L, D’Haeseleer W. Natural gas balancing: appropriate framework and terminology. 2008. TMEWP series: EN 2008–003 University of Leuven (K.U.Leuven) Energy Institute 2008.
Miriello C, Polo M. The development of gas hubs in Europe. Energy Pol. 2015;84:177–90.
Neumann A, Zachmann G. Expected vs. observed storage usage: limits to intertemporal arbitrage. In: Cretì A, editor. The economics of natural gas storage. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
Van Dinther A, Mulder M. The allocative efficiency of the Dutch gas-balancing market. Compet Regul Netw Ind. 2013;14(1):47–72.
Vazquez M, Hallack M. Design of auctions for short-term allocation in gas markets based on virtual hubs EUI RSCAS; 2012/43. 2013.
Vazquez M, Hallack M, Glachant J-M. In: RSCAS 2012/10 EUI, editor. Building gas markets: US versus EU market model. Florence: Florence School of Regulation; 2012.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Midstream Sector
About this article
Cite this article
Cretì, A., Pontoni, F. Natural Gas Balancing, Storage, and Flexibility in Europe: Assessing the Recent Literature. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 3, 18–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-016-0046-0