Natural Gas Balancing, Storage, and Flexibility in Europe: Assessing the Recent Literature

  • Anna CretìEmail author
  • Federico Pontoni
Midstream Sector (JD Makholm, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Midstream Sector


The liberalization process of European gas markets has shown how pivotal is the role of both balancing mechanisms and flexibility instruments. Before the liberalization, in fact, these activities were perceived as being very technical. A growing body of literature, instead, has demonstrated how decentralized and market-oriented forms of managing both issues is crucial for achieving well-functioning and liquid wholesale markets. The aim of our paper is precisely to show how the evolution of theoretical models, coupled with findings from empirical investigations, has provided scientific justifications for the introduction of market-oriented rules by regulators and policy makers. At present, to achieve a fully integrated European market, the Energy Union policy framework has to attain one last final target: the harmonization and integration of balancing and flexibility mechanisms among markets, particularly with the expected increase in intermittent generation.


Balancing Storage Flexibility Hub 


  1. 1.
    ACER. Framework guidelines on gas balancing in transmission systems. 2011. Published on 18 October 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arvesen Ø, Medbø V, Fleten S-E, Tomasgard A, Westgaard S. Linepack storage valuation under price uncertainty. Energy. 2015;52:155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CEER. CEER final vision on regulatory arrangements for the gas storage market. 2014. Published on 25 May 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cretì A, Villeneuve B. Gas storage and security of supply. In: Cretì A, editor. The economics of natural gas storage. Berlin: Springer; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DG Energy (2016) European Gas Market Quarterly Report, Volume 9 (issue 1; fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glachant JM, Hallack M, Vazquez M. Building competitive gas markets in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunt P. Entry–exit transmission pricing with notional hubs: can it deliver a Pan-European wholesale market in gas? 2008. OIES NG 23(February).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keyaerts N, Hallack M, Glachant JM, D’Haeseleer W. Gas market distorting effects of imbalanced gas balancing rules: inefficient regulation of pipeline flexibility. Energy Pol. 2011;39:865–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keyaerts N, Meeus L, D’Haeseleer W. Natural gas balancing: appropriate framework and terminology. 2008. TMEWP series: EN 2008–003 University of Leuven (K.U.Leuven) Energy Institute 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miriello C, Polo M. The development of gas hubs in Europe. Energy Pol. 2015;84:177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neumann A, Zachmann G. Expected vs. observed storage usage: limits to intertemporal arbitrage. In: Cretì A, editor. The economics of natural gas storage. Berlin: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Dinther A, Mulder M. The allocative efficiency of the Dutch gas-balancing market. Compet Regul Netw Ind. 2013;14(1):47–72.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vazquez M, Hallack M. Design of auctions for short-term allocation in gas markets based on virtual hubs EUI RSCAS; 2012/43. 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vazquez M, Hallack M, Glachant J-M. In: RSCAS 2012/10 EUI, editor. Building gas markets: US versus EU market model. Florence: Florence School of Regulation; 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris Dauphine, LeDa-PSL, Economics of Natural Gas ChairParisFrance
  2. 2.IEFE – Università BocconiMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations