Abstract
Many numerical studies confirmed the efficiency of adding secondary reinforcement into geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) walls, and shallow foundations are generally seated on reinforced and unreinforced embankments and ground. This investigation presents a numerical study of the behavior of GRS with and without secondary reinforcement under static surcharge conditions. This study was conducted using a two-dimensional finite element program to simulate a GRS designated for use as a supporting structure. The numerical model was first compared and verified with the numerical and measured results from a full-scale field test. A parametric study was then conducted to investigate the effect of secondary reinforcement length, stiffness, and layout on the performance of GRS and the behavior of shallow foundations on the top of GRS. The numerical results show that the secondary reinforcement length, stiffness, connection, and their layout contribute to alleviating the slab settlement and the facing deflection, also that the existence of a relation between the primary reinforcement vertical spacing and secondary reinforcement contribution on the slab settlement reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The manuscript has no associated data.
Abbreviations
- B :
-
Slab width
- D :
-
Slab seating distance
- L1:
-
Primary reinforcement length
- L2:
-
Secondary reinforcement length
- γ :
-
Unit weight
- E :
-
Young’s modulus
- J :
-
Reinforcement stiffness
- c :
-
Cohesion
- φ :
-
Friction angle
- Ψ :
-
Dilatation angle
- υ :
-
Poisson’s ratio
- L T :
-
Total length of the secondary reinforcement
- S V :
-
Vertical spacing
- Q :
-
Surcharge loading
References
Adams, M., Nicks, J., Stabile, T., Wu, J.T.H., Schlatter, W. and Hartmann, J.: Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system, synthesis report. Federal Highway Administration, United States (2011)
ARAB, Mohamed G., OMAR, Maher, et TAHMAZ, Ali. Numerical analysis of shallow foundations on geogrid reinforced soil. In : MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, p. 06011 (2017)
Arab, R., Villard, P., Gourc, J.P.: Use of reinforced soil walls bearing structures. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Ground Improv. 5(4), 163–175 (2001)
Chen, Q., Abu-Farsakh, M.: Numerical analysis to study the scale effect of shallow foundation on reinforced soils. In: Han, J., Alzamora, D.E. (eds.) GeoFrontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 595–604. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2011)
Gotteland, Ph., Gourc, J.P., Villard, P.: Geosynthetic reinforced structures as bridge abutments: full scale experimentation and comparison with modelisations. In: Wu, J.T.H. (ed.) Proc., Int. Symp. on Mechanically Stabilized Backfill, pp. 25–34. Denver (1997)
Gourc, J.P., Gotteland, Ph., Haza, E., Perrier, H., Baraize, E.: Geotextile reinforced structures as bridge abutments: fullscale experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on geosynthetics, pp. 79–92. Nashville, USA (1995)
Hatami, K., Bathurst, R.J.: Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions. Can. Geotech. J. 42(4), 1066–1085 (2005)
Hatami, K., Bathurst, R.J.: Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(6), 673–684 (2006)
Helwany, S.M.B., Wu, J.T.H., Froessl, B.: GRS bridge abutments—an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement. Geotext. Geomembr. 21(3), 177–196 (2003)
Helwany, S.M.B., Wu, J.T.H., Kitsabunnarat, A.: Simulating the behavior of GRS bridge abutments. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133(10), 1229–1240 (2007)
Huang, B., Bathurst, R.J., Hatami, K.: Numerical study of reinforced soil segmental walls using three different constitutive soil models. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135(10), 1486–1498 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000092
Javdanian, Hamed.: On the behaviour of shallow foundations constructed on reinforced soil slope–a numerical analysis. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 14(2), 188–195 (2020)
Jiang, Y., Han, J., Parsons, R.L.: Numerical evaluation of secondary reinforcement effect on geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls. Geotext. Geomembr. 48(1), pp. 98–109 (2019). Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114419300998.
Ketchart, K., Wu, J.T.H.: Performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge pier and abutment, Denver, Colorado, USA. In: Balkema, A.A. (ed.) Mechanically stabilized backfill, pp. 101–116. Rotterdam, Netherlands (1997)
Laboudi, K., Rahmouni, O., Labed, M., et al.: Numerical and Analytical Analysis of the Surcharge Application Distance influence on the Behavior of Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall. Indian Geotech J 53, 409–421 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00680-6
Lee, K.Z., Wu, J.T.: A synthesis of case histories on GRS bridge-supporting structures with flexible facing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22(4), 181–204 (2004)
Leshchinsky, D.: Alleviating connection load, pp. 34–39. Geotechnical Fabrics Report (2000)
Ling, H.I., Liu, H., Mohri, Y.: Parametric studies on the behavior of reinforced soil retaining walls under earthquake loading. J. Eng. Mech. 131(10), 1056–1065 (2005)
Naeini, S.A., Khadem Rabe, B., Mahmoodi, E.: Bearing capacity and settlement of strip footing on geosynthetic reinforced clayey slopes. J. Cent. S. Univ. 19, 1116–1124 (2012)
Raftari, Mehdi, Kassim, Khairul Anuar, Rashid, Ahmad Safuan A., et al.: Settlement of shallow foundations near reinforced slopes. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18, 797–808 (2013)
Rahmouni, O., Mabrouki, A., Benmeddour, D., Mellas, M.: A numerical investigation into the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental retaining walls. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 10(5), 435–444 (2016)
Satvati, Sajjad, Alimohammadi, Hossein, Rowshanzamir, Mohammadali, et al.: Bearing capacity of shallow footings reinforced with braid and geogrid adjacent to soil slope. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 6, 1–12 (2020)
Seed, R.B., Collin, J.G., Mitchell, J.K.: FEM analyses of compacted reinforced soil walls. Int. Symp. Numer. Model. Geomech. 2, 553–562 (1986)
Wu, J.T.H., Ketchart, K., Adams, M.: GRS bridge piers and abutments. Rep. No. FHWA-RD-00–038, US Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2001
Wu, J.T.H., Lee, K.Z.Z., Pham, T.: Allowable bearing pressures of bridge sills on GRS abutments with flexible facing. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(7), 830–841 (2006)
Zheng, Y., Fox, P.J.: Numerical investigation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments under static loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142(5), 4016004 (2016)
Zheng, Y., Fox, P.J.: Numerical investigation of the geosynthetic reinforced soil–integrated bridge system under static loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143(6), 4017008 (2017)
Zheng, Y., Fox, P.J., McCartney, J.S.: Numerical study on maximum reinforcement tensile forces in geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutments. Geotext. Geomembr. 46(5), 634–645 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The basic theme and the methodology of the research were discussed and decided by the author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The authors consent.
Consent for Publication
The author has read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Laboudi, K. FEM Investigation on the Secondary Reinforcement Effect on Shallow Foundation Seated on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-023-00367-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-023-00367-2