Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized possibilistic theories: the multipartite experiments problem

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent paper, the author introduced an operational description of physical theories where probabilities are replaced by counterfactual statements belonging to a three-valued (i.e., possibilistic) semantic domain. The complete axiomatic of these generalized possibilistic theories is generalized and clarified in the present paper. The problem of bipartite experiments is then addressed as the main skill of this paper. An axiomatic for the tensor product of our spaces of states is given and different solutions are explicitly constructed. This description of tensor products of Inf semi-lattices is partly independent from the usual mathematical description of this problem. The nature of the tensor product of ortho-complemented Inf semi-lattices is then also explored. This subject is indeed fundamental for the development of a reconstruction program for quantum theory within our framework. Our analysis constitutes a first step toward this achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The objects of this category are the natural space of states in quantum mechanics, i.e., the Hilbert spaces of dimension greater than two, and the morphisms are the orbits on semi-unitary maps (i.e., unitary or anti-unitary) under the U(1) group action, which are the relevant symmetries of Hilbert spaces from the point of view of quantum mechanics.

  2. In the rest of this paper we refer to this construction, based on a three-valued Chu space, as a ’possibilistic’ approach to distinguish it from the ’probabilistic’ one.

  3. The information corresponding to macroscopic events/operations describing the procedure depend on an observer O. If this dependence has to be made explicit, we will adopt the notation \({ {\mathfrak {P}}}^{{}^{(O)}}\) to denote the set of preparation processes defined by the observer O. This mention of the observer will be also attached to the different quotients associated to the space of preparations.

  4. If the dependence with respect to the observer O has to be made explicit, we will adopt the notation \({ {\mathfrak {T}}}^{{}^{(O)}}\) to denote the set of tests defined by the observer O. This mention of the observer will be also attached to the different quotients associated to the space of yes/no tests.

  5. We note that complete meet-irreducibility implies meet-irreducibility. In other words,

    $$\begin{aligned} \sigma \in { {\mathfrak {S}}}_{{}_{\textrm{pure}}}\Rightarrow & {} (\, \forall \sigma _1, \sigma _2\in { {\mathfrak {S}}}, \;\;(\, \sigma = \sigma _1 \sqcap _{{}_{ { {\mathfrak {S}}}}} \sigma _2\,) \;\; \Rightarrow \;\; (\, \sigma = \sigma _1 \;\;\text { or}\;\; \sigma = \sigma _2 \,) \,). \end{aligned}$$
    (50)
  6. Throughout this short axiomatic introduction, we adopt the inadequate notation \(\boxtimes \) for the tensor product in order to allow for different candidates for this tensor product. These different candidates will be denoted \(\otimes \), \(\widetilde{\otimes }\),...

References

  1. Abramsky, S.: Big toy models. Synthese 186(3), 697–718 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramsky, S.: Coalgebras, Chu Spaces, and Representations of Physical Systems. J. Philos. Log. 42(3), 551–574 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: Categorical Quantum Mechanics. In: Engesser, K., Gabbay, D.M., Lehmann, D. (eds.) Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures, pp. 261–323. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Abramsky, S., Heunen, C.: Operational theories and categorical quantum mechanics, page 88-122. Lecture Notes in Logic. Cambridge University Press, (2016)

  5. Aerts, D.: Construction of the tensor product for the lattices of properties of physical entities. J. Math. Phys. 25(5), 1434–1441 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Aerts, D., Valckenborgh, F.: Failure of standard quantum mechanics for the description of compound quantum entities. Int. J. Theo. Phys. 43(1), 251–264 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Balbes, R., Dwinger, P.: Distributive Lattices. University of Missoury Press, Columbia, Missouri (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkhoff, G., Von Neumann, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics. Annal. Math. 37(01), 823–843 (1936)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Buffenoir, E.: Reconstructing quantum theory from its possibilistic operational formalism. Quantum Stud. Math. Found. 10(1), 115–159 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Coecke, B., Moore, D. J., Wilce, A.: Operational Quantum Logic: An Overview, pages 1–36. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht (2000)

  11. Fraser, G.A.: The Semilattice Tensor Product of Distributive Lattices. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 217, 183–194 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser, G.A.: The tensor product of semilattices. Alg. Univ. 8, 1–3 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gierz, G., Hofmann, K.H., Keimel, K., Lawson, J.D., Mislove, M., Scott, D.S.: Continuous Lattices and Domains. Cambridge University Press, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Grätzer, G.: Lattice Theory: First Concepts and Distributive Lattices. (1971)

  15. Holland, S.S.: Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions : a theorem of M. Soler. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 32(2), 205–234 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. MacKey, G. W.: The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: a Lecture. Mathematical physics monograph series. Benjamin, New York, NY, 1963. This book has also been published by Dover in (1963)

  17. Piron, C.: Survey of general quantum physics. Found. Phys. 2(4), 287–314 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Piron, C.: On the Foundations of Quantum Physics, p. pages 105-116. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Plavala, M.: General probabilistic theories: An introduction. 03 (2021)

  20. Pratt, V.R.: Chu spaces, course notes for the school in category theory and applications, Coimbra (1999)

  21. Randall, C., Foulis, D.: Tensor products of quantum logics do not exist. Notices Amer. Math. Soc, 26(6), (1979)

  22. Stubbe, I., van Steirteghem, B.: Propositional systems, Hilbert lattices and generalized hilbert spaces. In: Engesser, K., Gabbay, D.M., Lehmann, D. (eds.) Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures, pp. 477–523. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Buffenoir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author did not receive support from any organization for the present work. The author declares that there is no conflict of interest. There is no associated data to this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buffenoir, E. Generalized possibilistic theories: the multipartite experiments problem. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 10, 443–482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-023-00306-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-023-00306-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation