Abstract
Observables are believed that they must be Hermitian in quantum theory. Based on the obviously physical fact that only eigenstates of observable and its corresponding probabilities, i.e., spectrum distribution of observable are actually observed, we argue that observables need not necessarily be Hermitian. More generally, observables should be reformulated as normal operators including Hermitian operators as a subclass. This reformulation is consistent with the quantum theory currently used and does not change any physical results. The Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality is taken as an example to show that our opinion does not conflict with conventional quantum theory and gives the same physical results. Reformulation of observables as normal operators not only coincides with the physical facts, but also will deepen our understanding of measurement in quantum theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon, Oxford (1958)
Bender, C.M., Boettcher, S.: Real spectra in non-hermitian hamiltonians having PT symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)
Bender, C.M., Brody, D.C., Jones, H.F.: Complex extension of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 270401 (2002)
Bender, C.M., Brody, D.C., Jones, H.F.: Erratum: Complex extension of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 119902 (2004)
Bender, C.M.: Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947–1018 (2007)
Pati, A.K., Singh, U., Sinha, U.: Measuring non-Hermitian operators via weak values. Phys. Rev. A 92, 052120 (2015)
Mitchison, G., Jozsa, R., Popescu, S.: Sequential weak measurement. Phys. Rev. A 76, 062105 (2007)
Brodutch, A., Cohen, E.: Nonlocal measurements via quantum erasure. arXiv:1409.1575v2 [quant-ph] (2015)
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D.Z., Vaidman, L.: How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)
Aharonov, Y., Vaidman, L.: Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements. Phys. Rev. A 41, 11 (1990)
Aharonov, Y., Botero, A.: Quantum average of weak values. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052111 (2005)
Zurek, W.H.: Relative state and the environment: einstein, envariance, quantum darwinism, and the existential interpretation. arXiv:0707.2832v1 [quant-ph] (2007)
Sakurai, J.J., Tuan, S.F.: Modern Quantum Mechanics, Revised edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1994)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Stands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. 3. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1964)
Busch, P., Grabowski, M., Lahti, P.J.: Operational Quantum Physics. Springer, Berlin (1995)
Busch, P., Lahti, P., Werner, R.F.: Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1261 (2014)
Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R.: Matrix Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)
Lynch, R.: The quantum phase problem: a critical review. Phys. Rep. 256, 367–436 (1995)
Torgerson, J.R., Mandel, L.: Is there a unique operator for the phase difference of two quantum fields? Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3939 (1996)
Yu, S.X.: Quantized phase difference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 780 (1997)
Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics (Long Island City, NY) 1, 195 (1964)
Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)
Cirel’son, B.S.: Quantum generalization of Bell’s inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980)
Cabello, A.: Violating Bell’s inequality Beyond Cirel’son’s bound. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 060403 (2002)
Werner, R.F., Wolf, M.M.: All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site. Phys. Rev. A 64, 032112 (2001)
Żukowski, M., Brukner, Č.: Bell’s theorem for general N-qubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 210401 (2002)
Arnault, F.: A complete set of multidimensional Bell inequalities. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 45, 255304 (2012)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61275122, No. 11674306, No. 61590932), National Fundamental Research Program of China and Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of CAS (No. XDB01030200).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, MJ., Hu, XM. & Zhang, YS. Are observables necessarily Hermitian?. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 4, 243–249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-016-0098-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-016-0098-2