Abstract
The urgency effect refers to people’s tendency to choose a relatively unimportant task (with unambiguously low payoff) over a relatively important task (with unambiguously high payoff), when the former is spuriously framed as urgent. In this paper I study a simple model in which two payoff-maximising task suppliers compete for a population of heterogeneous decision-makers. Task suppliers offer tasks of various importance, and can exert costly effort to manipulate the perceived urgency of the offered tasks. Decision-makers are of two kinds: they either choose more important over less important tasks by disregarding the urgency frames (fully rational) or behave like fully rational decision-makers, except that they are subject to the urgency effect (boundedly rational). I study the unique symmetric equilibrium of the resulting game and derive the conditions under which the urgency effect has detrimental effects on the decision-makers’ welfare. Furthermore, I examine the implications of several policies aimed at correcting the failure, which include educating boundedly rational decision-makers and auditing task suppliers that use urgency framing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aggarwal, P., Jun, S.Y., Huh, J.H.: Scarcity messages. J. Advert. 40(3), 19–30 (2011)
Bachi, B., Spiegler, R.: Buridanic competition. Games Econ. Behav. 107, 298–315 (2018)
Bernheim, B.D.: Behavioral welfare economics. J. Eur. Econo. Assoc. 7(2–3), 267–319 (2009)
Bernheim, D., Rangel, A.: Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Am. Econ. Rev. Paper Proc. 97(2), 464–470 (2007)
Chalmers, A.W.: Trading information for access: informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European union. J. Eur. Pub. Policy 20(1), 39–58 (2013)
Competition and Markets Authority: online hotel booking (2017). https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/online-hotel-booking
Corchón, L.C., Serena, M.: Contest theory. In: Corchón, L.C., Marini, M.A. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, vol. II. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2018)
d’Adda, G., Galliera, A., Tavoni, M.: Urgency and engagement: empirical evidence from a large-scale intervention on energy use awareness. J. Econ. Psychol. 81, 1–12 (2020)
DeDonno, M.A., Demaree, H.A.: Perceived time pressure and the iowa gambling task. Judg. Decis Making 3(8), 636–640 (2008)
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T.: Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econo. Literat. XL, 351–401 (2002)
Gerasimou, G.: Indecisiveness, undesirability, and overload revealed through rational choice deferral. Econ. J. 128, 2450–2479 (2018)
Heidhues, P., Kőszegi, B.: Behavioral industrial organization. In: Bernheim, D.B., DellaVigna, S., Laibson, D. (eds.) Handbook of Behavioral Economics, vol. 1, chap. 6, pp. 517–612. North-Holland (2018)
Manzini, P., Mariotti, M.: Dual random utility maximisation. J. Econ. Theory 177, 162–182 (2018)
Papi, M.: Noncompensatory consideration and compensatory choice: an application to stackelberg competition. Econ. Theory Bull. 2, 53–63 (2014)
Piccione, M., Spiegler, R.: Price competition under limited comparability. Quat. J. Econ. 127, 97–135 (2012)
Rubinstein, A., Salant, Y.: Eliciting welfare preferences from behavioural data sets. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79(1), 375–387 (2011)
Salant, Y., Rubinstein, A.: \((a, f)\): choices with frames. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75(Issue 4), 1287–1296 (2008)
Spiegler, R.: Bounded Rationality and Industrial Organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)
Vermeir, I., Van Kenhove, P.: The influence of need for closure and perceived time pressure on search effort for price and promotional information in a grocery shopping context. Psychol. Market. 22(1), 71–95 (2005)
Zhu, M., Yang, Y., Hsee, C.K.: The mere urgency effect. J. Consum. Res. 45(3), 673–690 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The quote included in the title of the paper is due to Dwight D. Eisenhower, 34th president of the USA. I am grateful to an anonymous referee, Ramses Abul Naga, Álvaro Delgado Vega, Frans de Vries, and Raghul Venkatesh for their detailed comments. I would also like to thank the seminar audience at the University of Málaga and the participants to the 2021 OLIGO workshop (Maastricht). Financial support from the University of Aberdeen Business School is gratefully acknowledged. Any error is my own responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Papi, M. ‘What is important is seldom urgent and what is urgent is seldom important’: a study of the strategic implications of the urgency effect in a competitive setting. Econ Theory Bull 10, 313–332 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00236-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00236-0