Skip to main content
Log in

A generalization of Peleg’s representation theorem on constant-sum weighted majority games

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a variant of the nucleolus associated with distorted satisfaction of each coalition in TU games. This solution is referred to as the \(\alpha \)-nucleolus in which \(\alpha \) is a profile of distortion rates of satisfaction of all the coalitions. We apply the \(\alpha \)-nucleolus to constant-sum weighted majority games. We show that under assumptions of distortions of satisfaction of winning coalitions the \(\alpha \)-nucleolus is the unique normalized homogeneous representation of constant-sum weighted majority games which assigns a zero to each null player. As corollary of this result, we derive the well-known Peleg’s representation theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For all \(z\in \mathbb {R} ^{2^{N}}\), \(\theta (z)\in \mathbb {R} ^{2^{N}}\) is defined by rearranging the coordinates of z in non-decreasing order. For all \(z,z^{\prime }\in \mathbb {R} ^{2^{N}}\), z is lexicographically larger than \( z^{\prime }\) if \(\theta _{1}(z)>\theta _{1}(z^{\prime })\) or [\(\theta _{1}(z)=\theta _{1}(z^{\prime })\) and \(\theta _{2}(z)>\theta _{2}(z^{\prime })\)] or [\(\theta _{1}(z)=\theta _{1}(z^{\prime })\) and \(\theta _{2}(z)=\theta _{2}(z^{\prime })\) and \(\theta _{3}(z)>\theta _{3}(z^{\prime })\)], and so on. Then, we write \(z\ge _{lex}z^{\prime }\).

  2. Theorem 5.1.14 is itself a consequence of Theorems 5.1.6 and Corollary 5.1.10 in Peleg and Sudhölter (2003).

  3. An \(2^{N}\)-dimensional vector \(\mathbf {0}=(0,0,\dots ,0)\).

  4. An \(2^{N}\)-dimensional vector \(\mathbf {1}=(1,1,\dots ,1)\).

  5. “ENSC” means “Egalitarian Non-Separable Contribution”.

  6. Since the nucleolus is a normalized representation (Peleg 1968, Theorem 3.4), the set of normalized representations of \(G^{*}\), denoted X, is nonempty. Let \(r\equiv q(x)\) for all \(x\in X\ne \emptyset \). We consider two cases. Case 1: A unique veto player exists in \(G^{*}\). By Claim 1, let \(i^{*}\) be a unique veto player. Let us consider the following problem: \(\max r\) subject to \(x_{i^{*}}\ge r\), \(x_{i}\ge 0\) for all \( i\in N\backslash \{i^{*}\}\), and \(x(N)=1\). The optimal solution is \(r=1\) , which is attainable by \(x\in \mathbb {R} ^{N}\) such that \(x_{i^{*}}=1\) and \(x_{i}=0\) for all \(i\in N\backslash \{i^{*}\}\). Since x is an imputation and \(r>1/2\), there exists \(\max q(x)\) in this case. Case 2: No veto player exists in \(G^{*}\). By Claim 2, a normalized representation is an imputation. Let us consider the following problem: \(\max r\) subject to \(x(S)\ge r>1/2\) for all \(S\in \mathcal {W}^{m}\), \(x_{i}\ge 0\) for all \(i\in N\), and \(x(N)=1\). Since the nucleolus is feasible for the problem and the objective function is bounded above, there exists \(\max q(x)\) in this case. By the argument of the two cases mentioned above, \(\max q(x)\in (1/2,1]\).

References

  • Davis, M., Maschler, M.: The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Res. Logist. Q. 12, 223–259 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, D., Sun, P., Xu, G., Driessen, T.: Compromise for the complaint: an optimization approach to the ENSC value and the CIS value. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 69, 571–579 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschler, M.: The bargaining set, kernel, and nucleolus. In: Aumann, R., Hart, S. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, pp. 591–667. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milnor, J.: Reasonable Outcomes for n-Person Games. Research Memorandum, vol. 916. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B.: On weights of constant-sum majority games. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 16, 527–532 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B., Sudhölter, P.: Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D.: The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17, 1163–1170 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the editor and an anonymous referee for remarkably insightful and detailed suggestions. I would also like to thank Tamás Solymosi for helpful discussions and kind hospitality for my visit at Corvinus University of Budapest. For useful comments, I am grateful to Shin Sakaue. I am financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), Project #17K13751. I am responsible for any remaining errors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Oishi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oishi, T. A generalization of Peleg’s representation theorem on constant-sum weighted majority games. Econ Theory Bull 8, 113–123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-019-00171-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-019-00171-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation