Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of chrysotile asbestos contaminated soil on foliar nutrient status of plants

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Toxicity of asbestos in human body has been extensively documented but meager information is available regarding its effects on plants. In the present study asbestos contamination was monitored in soils collected at 0, 1, 2, 5 and 10 km (control) around an asbestos-cement factory. More asbestos contamination was found in soil collected close to factory. These soils were analyzed for organic carbon, EC, pH, available macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) and micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn). With increasing asbestos contamination in soil slight increase in magnesium, iron and manganese accompanied by decrease in availability of other nutrients was found. Seeds of wheat, pea and mustard were sown in asbestos contaminated and control soil in pots. Decrease in the leaf nutrient content was found in plants grown in asbestos contaminated soil. The study reports adverse effects of chrysotile asbestos on foliar nutrient status of flora growing near asbestos-cement factory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • APHA, AWWA & WEF (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edition, APHA, Washington, DC.

  • Brooks, R. R. (1987). Serpentine and its vegetation: A multidisciplinary approach. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2001). On developing bioindicators for human and ecological health. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 66, 23–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R., Fillmore, M., Wilson, M. A., Gross, E. R., Langridge, R. W., & Lammers, D. A. (2001). Soil properties of selected pedons on ultramafic rocks in Klamath Mountains. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 2145–2175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, H. D., & Parker, F. (1961). Methods of analysis for soil, plant and water. University of California, Division of Agricultural Science.

  • Daghino, S., Martino, E., Fenoglio, I., Tomatis, M., Perotto, S., & Fubini, B. (2005). Inorganic materials and living organisms: Surface modifications and fungal responses to various asbestos forms. Chemistry-A. European Journal, 11, 5611–5618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (1993). Test methods for the determination of asbestos in bulk building materials. Washington, DC, USA. Environment Protection Agency. EPA 600/R-93/116.

  • Harington, J. S., Allison, A. C., & Badami, D. V. (1975). Mineral fibers: Chemical, physicochemical and biological properties. Advances in Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 12, 291–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann, M., Pohlabeln, H., Lubin, J. H., Jockel, K. H., Ahrens, W., Bruske-Hohlfeld, I. (2002). The exposure-time-response relationship between occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer in two German case–control studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41, 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Standards (IS). (1986). Method for determination of airborne asbestos fiber concentration in work environment by light microscopy (Membrane filter method). New Delhi: Indian Standard Institution. IS-11450.

  • IPCS. (1998). Environmental health criteria 203, chrysotile asbestos, Geneva, World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, p. 29.

  • Joshi, T. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2004). Asbestos in developing countries: Magnitude of risk and its practical implications. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 17, 179–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, D., Peterson, G. A., & Pratt, P. F. (1982). Lithium, sodium and potassium. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy no. 9 Part 2 (2nd ed., pp. 225–246). Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.

  • Light, W. G., & Wei, E. T. (1977). Surface charge and asbestos toxicity. Nature, 265, 537–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, E., Cerminara, S., Prandi, L., Fubini, B., & Perotto, S. (2004). Physical and biochemical interactions of soil fungi with asbestos fibers. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23(4), 938–944.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel, K., & Kirkby, E. A. (2001). Principles of plant nutrition. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 849.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NIPHEP. (1989): Report no. 758473013, integrated criteria document asbestos. In W. Sloof & P. J. Blokzijl (Eds.), National Institute for Public Health and Environmental Protection. The Netherlands: Bilthoven.

  • Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Circular 939.

  • Prasad, M. N. V. (1997). Trace metals. In M. N. V. Prasad (Ed.), Plant ecophysiology (pp. 207–249). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, M. N. V., & Freitas, H. M. D. V. (1999). Feasible biotechnological and bioremediation strategies for serpentine soils and mine spoils. Electronical Journal of Biotechnology, 2(1), 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, A. L., & Subramanian, V. (2001). Present status of asbestos mining and related health problems in India—a survey. Industrial Health, 39, 309–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, I. (1995). Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Biotechnology, 13, 468–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rengel, Z. (1997). Mechanisms of plant resistance to aluminium and heavy metals. In A. S. Basra & R. K. Basra (Eds.), Mechanisms of environmental stress resistance in plants (pp. 241–276). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, H., & Timmenga, H. (1986). Earthworm response to asbestos rich serpentinitic sediments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1, 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speil, S., & Leinweber, J. P. (1969). Asbestos minerals in modern technology. Environmental Research, 2, 166–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spurny, K. R. (1982). On the problem of measuring and analysis of chemically challenged mineral fibers in the environment and in biological materials. The Science of the Total Environment, 23, 239–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah, B. V., & Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science, 25, 259–260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, A. K., Ahmad, I., Musthapa, M. S., & Ansari, F. A. (2007). Environmental contamination of chrysotile asbestos and its toxic effects on antioxidative system of Lemna duckweed (Lemna gibba). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 52, 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, A. K., Ahmad, I., Musthapa, M. S., Ansari, F. A., & Rahman, Q. (2004). Environmental contamination of chrysotile asbestos and its toxic effects on growth and physiological and biochemical parameters of Lemna gibba. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 47, 281–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley, A., & Black, C. A. (1934). An examination of Degtjareff methods for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Director, CSIR, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow for his keen interest in the study. Financial assistance from Ministry of Environment and Forests (Govt. of India), New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Author notes

  1. A. K. Trivedi

    Present address: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (ICAR), Regional Station Bhowali, Niglat, Nainital, 263132, Uttarakhand, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fiber Toxicology Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, P.B. No. 80, Lucknow, 226 001, India

    A. K. Trivedi & I. Ahmad

Authors
  1. A. K. Trivedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Trivedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trivedi, A.K., Ahmad, I. Impact of chrysotile asbestos contaminated soil on foliar nutrient status of plants. Ind J Plant Physiol. 18, 301–307 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-013-0036-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-013-0036-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation