Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 256–270 | Cite as

Digital Technology to Enhance Clinical Care of Early Psychosis

  • Imogen H. BellEmail author
  • Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
Technology and its Impact on Mental Health Care (J Torous and T Becker, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Technology and its Impact on Mental Health Care


Purpose of review

Despite considerable evidence supporting the clinical benefits of early intervention for psychosis, issues remain with access and maintenance of long-term recovery. As digital technology has advanced rapidly over recent decades, so too has recognition for its capacity to address the challenges in providing care for those with mental ill health. The current report provides an overview of research focusing on the use of digital technologies to enhance clinical care of people with early psychosis.

Recent findings

Research suggests that people with early psychosis use technology in a similar fashion to those in the general population, and there is interest in its use for mental health. Studies have primarily focused on smartphone apps and online interventions targeting self-management, psychosocial functioning, and supporting case management. Findings support feasibility and acceptability; however, evidence for the efficacy of digital approaches is yet to be established in early psychosis populations.


Whilst promising, findings in early psychosis are currently limited to a small number of studies at primarily pilot stages. More broadly, a number of challenges have been highlighted in digital mental health literature, including quality standards, the slow pace of research evaluation, difficulties with implementation and ethical considerations.


Digital technology mHealth Online Psychosis Schizophrenia Early intervention 


Compliance with ethics guidelines

Conflict of interest

Imogen H. Bell declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mario Alvarez-Jimenez declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    McGorry PD, Killackey E, Yung AR. Early intervention in psychotic disorders: detection and treatment of the first episode and the critical early stages. Med J Aust. 2007;187(S7):S8–S10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Díaz-Caneja CM, Pina-Camacho L, Rodríguez-Quiroga A, Fraguas D, Parellada M, Arango C. Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review. NPJ Schizophr. 2015;1:14005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Penttilä M, Jääskeläinen E, Hirvonen N, Isohanni M, Miettunen J. Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(2):88–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charlson FJ, Ferrari AJ, Santomauro DF, Diminic S, Stockings E, Scott JG, et al. Global epidemiology and burden of schizophrenia: findings from the global burden of disease study 2016. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44(6):1195–203.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saarni SI, Viertiö S, Perälä J, Koskinen S, Lönnqvist J, Suvisaari J. Quality of life of people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychotic disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197(5):386–94.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Świtaj P, Anczewska M, Chrostek A, Sabariego C, Cieza A, Bickenbach J, et al. Disability and schizophrenia: a systematic review of experienced psychosocial difficulties. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):193.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Csillag C, Nordentoft M, Mizuno M, Jones PB, Killackey E, Taylor M, et al. Early intervention services in psychosis: from evidence to wide implementation. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016;10(6):540–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGorry PD. Risk syndromes, clinical staging and DSM V: new diagnostic infrastructure for early intervention in psychiatry. Schizophr Res. 2010;120(1–3):49–53.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    IEPA. 2019. Retrieved from
  10. 10.
    Correll CU, Galling B, Pawar A, Krivko A, Bonetto C, Ruggeri M, et al. Comparison of early intervention services vs treatment as usual for early-phase psychosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):555–65.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birchwood M, Connor C, Lester H, Patterson P, Freemantle N, Marshall M, et al. Reducing duration of untreated psychosis: care pathways to early intervention in psychosis services. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(1):58–64.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fusar-Poli P, McGorry PD, Kane JM. Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):251–65.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S, Priebe S, Smith S, Torous J, et al. The WPA-lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(10):775–818.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Health Service. Five year forward view. 2017.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Proudfoot J. The future is in our hands: the role of mobile phones in the prevention and management of mental disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013;47(2):111–3. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Price M, Yuen EK, Goetter EM, Herbert JD, Forman EM, Acierno R, et al. mHealth: a mechanism to deliver more accessible, more effective mental health care. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014;21(5):427–36.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andersson G. Internet interventions: past, present and future. Internet Interv. 2018;12:181–8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(3):288–95.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles M, Gonzalez-Blanch C, Bendall S, McGorry P, Gleeson J. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res. 2014;156(1):96–106 A systematic review summarising evidence for the use of digital interventinos for psychosis treatment.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Batra S, Baker RA, Wang T, Forma F, DiBiasi F, Peters-Strickland T. Digital health technology for use in patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review of the literature. Med Devices. 2017;10:237–51. Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berry N, Lobban F, Emsley R, Bucci S. Acceptability of interventions delivered online and through mobile phones for people who experience severe mental health problems: a systematic review. JMIR. 2016;18(5).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Erbe D, Eichert H-C, Riper H, Ebert DD. Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. JMIR. 2017;19(9).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Firth J, Torous J. Smartphone apps for schizophrenia: a systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015;3(4):e102.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Naslund JA, Marsch LA, McHugo GJ, Bartels SJ. Emerging mHealth and eHealth interventions for serious mental illness: a review of the literature. J of Ment Health. 2015;24(5):321–32.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pew Research Centre. Mobile Fact Sheet. 2018.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lal S, Dell'Elce J, Tucci N, Fuhrer R, Tamblyn R, Malla A. Preferences of young adults with first-episode psychosis for receiving specialized mental health services using technology: a survey study. JMIR Ment Health. 2015;2(2):e18.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdel-Baki A, Lal S, D.-Charron O, Stip E, Kara N. Understanding access and use of technology among youth with first-episode psychosis to inform the development of technology-enabled therapeutic interventions. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017;11(1):72–6.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    • Firth J, Cotter J, Torous J, Bucci S, Firth JA, Yung AR. Mobile phone ownership and endorsement of “mHealth” among people with psychosis: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Schizophr Bull. 2015;42(2):448–55 Thorough meta-analysis examining ownership, use and interest in mobile technologies amongst psychosis populations.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Res Center. 2016;22:1–44.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malhotra S, Chakrabarti S, Shah R. A model for digital mental healthcare: its usefulness and potential for service delivery in low-and middle-income countries. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019;61(1):27.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Torous J, Friedman R, Keshavan M. Smartphone ownership and interest in mobile applications to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2(1):e2.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Highton-Williamson E, Priebe S, Giacco D. Online social networking in people with psychosis: a systematic review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015;61(1):92–101.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Birnbaum ML, Rizvi AF, Correll CU, Kane JM, Confino J. Role of social media and the I nternet in pathways to care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic mood disorders. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017;11(4):290–5.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bucci S, Morris R, Berry K, Berry N, Haddock G, Barrowclough C, et al. Early psychosis service user views on digital technology: qualitative analysis. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(4):e10091.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berry N, Bucci S, Lobban F. Use of the internet and mobile phones for self-management of severe mental health problems: qualitative study of staff views. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(4).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lal S, Daniel W, Rivard L. Perspectives of family members on using technology in youth mental health care: a qualitative study. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(2):e21.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ennis L, Rose D, Denis M, Pandit N, Wykes T. Can’t surf, won’t surf: the digital divide in mental health. J Ment Health. 2012;21(4):395–403.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Greer B, Robotham D, Simblett S, Curtis H, Griffiths H, Wykes T. Digital exclusion among mental health service users: qualitative investigation. JMIR. 2019;21(1):e11696.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bendall S, Lederman R, Wadley G, Chinnery G, Vargas S, et al. On the HORYZON: moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2013;143(1):143–9.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson J, Bendall S, Penn D, Yung A, Ryan R, et al. Enhancing social functioning in young people at ultra high risk (UHR) for psychosis: a pilot study of a novel strengths and mindfulness-based online social therapy. Schizophr Res. 2018;202:369–77.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bucci S, Barrowclough C, Ainsworth J, Machin M, Morris R, Berry K et al. Actissist: proof-of-concept trial of a theory-driven digital intervention for psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2018.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schlosser DA, Campellone TR, Truong B, Etter K, Vergani S, Komaiko K, et al. Efficacy of PRIME, a mobile app intervention designed to improve motivation in young people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2018.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim SW, Lee GY, Yu HY, Jung EI, Lee JY, Kim SY, et al. Development and feasibility of smartphone application for cognitive-behavioural case management of individuals with early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12(6):1087–93.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lim MH, Gleeson JF, Rodebaugh TL, Eres R, Long KM, Casey K, et al. A pilot digital intervention targeting loneliness in young people with psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019:1–13.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vaessen T, Steinhart H, Batink T, Klippel A, Van Nierop M, Reininghaus U, et al. ACT in daily life in early psychosis: an ecological momentary intervention approach. Psychosis. 2019:1–12.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Niendam TA, Tully LM, Iosif A-M, Kumar D, Nye KE, Denton JC, et al. Enhancing early psychosis treatment using smartphone technology: a longitudinal feasibility and validity study. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;96:239–46.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kumar D, Tully LM, Iosif A-M, Zakskorn LN, Nye KE, Zia A et al. A mobile health platform for clinical monitoring in early psychosis: implementation in community-based outpatient early psychosis care. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(1).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thomas N, Farhall J, Foley F, Leitan ND, Villagonzalo K-A, Ladd E, et al. Promoting personal recovery in people with persisting psychotic disorders: development and pilot study of a novel digital intervention. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Williams A, Fossey E, Farhall J, Foley F, Thomas N. Recovery after psychosis: qualitative study of service user experiences of lived experience videos on a recovery-oriented website. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(2):e37. Scholar
  50. 50.
    Speyer R, Denman D, Wilkes-Gillan S, Chen Y-W, Bogaardt H, Kim J-H, et al. Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(3):225–35.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ebner-Priemer UW, Trull TJ. Ambulatory assessment: an innovative and promising approach for clinical psychology. Eur Psychol. 2009;14(2):109–19.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Palmier-Claus JE, Ainsworth J, Machin M, Barrowclough C, Dunn G, Barkus E, et al. The feasibility and validity of ambulatory self-report of psychotic symptoms using a smartphone software application. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):172.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ben-Zeev D, Brian R, Wang R, Wang W, Campbell AT, Aung MS, et al. CrossCheck: integrating self-report, behavioral sensing, and smartphone use to identify digital indicators of psychotic relapse. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017;40(3):266.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Piasecki TM, Hufford MR, Solhan M, Trull TJ. Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers. Psychol Assess. 2007;19(1):25.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bell IH, Fielding-Smith SF, Hayward M, Rossell SL, Lim MH, Farhall J, et al. Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention in a blended coping-focused therapy for distressing voices: development and case illustration. Internet Interv. 2018;14:18–25. Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kroeze R, Van Veen D, Servaas MN, Bastiaansen JA, Oude Voshaar R, Borsboom D, et al. Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: a proof-of-principle study. J Person-Oriented Res. 2017;3(1):1–10.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heron K, Smyth J. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(1):1–39.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bell IH, Lim MH, Rossell SL, Thomas N. Ecological momentary assessment and intervention in the treatment of psychotic disorders: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv.
  59. 59.
    Ben-Zeev D, Brenner C, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr D, Mueser K. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;sbu033.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Granholm E, Ben-Zeev D, Link P, Bradshaw K, Holden J. Mobile assessment and treatment for schizophrenia (MATS): a pilot trial of an interactive text-messaging intervention for medication adherence, socialization, and auditory hallucinations. Schizophr Bull. 2011:sbr155.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hardy A, Wojdecka A, West J, Matthews E, Garety P. The development of SlowMo: how inclusive, user-centred design research can improve psychological therapies for psychosis. JMIR. 2018;5(4):e11222.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Alvarez-Jimenez M, Priede A, Hetrick S, Bendall S, Killackey E, Parker A, et al. Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Schizophr Res. 2012;139(1–3):116–28.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Barnett I, Torous J, Staples P, Sandoval L, Keshavan M, Onnela J-P. Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;1.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Eisner E, Bucci S, Berry N, Emsley R, Barrowclough C, Drake RJ. Feasibility of using a smartphone app to assess early signs, basic symptoms and psychotic symptoms over six months: a preliminary report. Schizophr Res. 2019.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Torous J, Wisniewski H, Liu G, Keshavan M. Mental health mobile phone app usage, concerns, and benefits among psychiatric outpatients: comparative survey study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(4):e11715.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rus-Calafell M, Garety P, Sason E, Craig T, Valmaggia L. Virtual reality in the assessment and treatment of psychosis: a systematic review of its utility, acceptability and effectiveness. Psychol Med. 2018;48(3):362–91.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Freeman D, Bradley J, Antley A, Bourke E, DeWeever N, Evans N et al. Virtual reality in the treatment of persecutory delusions: randomised controlled experimental study testing how to reduce delusional conviction. Br J Psychiatry. 2016:bjp. bp. 115.176438.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chan CL, Ngai EK, Leung PK, Wong S. Effect of the adapted virtual reality cognitive training program among Chinese older adults with chronic schizophrenia: a pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(6):643–9.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pot-Kolder RM, Geraets CN, Veling W, van Beilen M, Staring AB, Gijsman HJ, et al. Virtual-reality-based cognitive behavioural therapy versus waiting list control for paranoid ideation and social avoidance in patients with psychotic disorders: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(3):217–26.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Park K-M, Ku J, Choi S-H, Jang H-J, Park J-Y, Kim SI, et al. A virtual reality application in role-plays of social skills training for schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2011;189(2):166–72.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sorkin A, Weinshall D, Modai I, Peled A. Improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of schizophrenia by means of virtual reality. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(3):512–20.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Craig TK, Rus-Calafell M, Ward T, Leff JP, Huckvale M, Howarth E, et al. AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(1):31–40.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Realpe A, Elahi F, Bucci S, Birchwood M, Vlaev I, Taylor D et al. Co-designing a virtual world with young people to deliver social cognition therapy in early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson J, Henry L, Harrigan S, Harris M, Killackey E, et al. Road to full recovery: longitudinal relationship between symptomatic remission and psychosocial recovery in first-episode psychosis over 7.5 years. Psychol Med. 2012;42(3):595–606.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gleeson JF, Cotton SM, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Wade D, Gee D, Crisp K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients: outcome at 30-month follow-up. Schizophr Bull. 2011;39(2):436–48.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gronholm P, Thornicroft G, Laurens K, Evans-Lacko S. Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2017;47(11):1867–79.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lim MH, Gleeson JF, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Penn DL. Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018:1–18.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Michalska da Rocha B, Rhodes S, Vasilopoulou E, Hutton P. Loneliness in psychosis: a meta-analytical review. Schizophr Bull. 2017;44(1):114–25.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jain SH, Powers BW, Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS. The digital phenotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):462.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Torous J, Onnela J, Keshavan M. New dimensions and new tools to realize the potential of RDoC: digital phenotyping via smartphones and connected devices. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(3):e1053.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Torous J, Kiang MV, Lorme J, Onnela J-P. New tools for new research in psychiatry: a scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(2).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Onnela J-P, Rauch SL. Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(7):1691.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Research2Guidance. 325,000 mobile health apps available in 2017 - Android now the leading mHealth platform2017.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Larsen ME, Huckvale K, Nicholas J, Torous J, Birrell L, Li E, et al. Using science to sell apps: evaluation of mental health app store quality claims. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):18.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Neary M, Schueller SM. State of the field of mental health apps. Cogn Behav Pract. 2018;25(4):531–7.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hollis C, Sampson S, Simons L, Davies EB, Churchill R, Betton V, et al. Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(10):845–54.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017;19(6).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Torous J, Andersson G, Bertagnoli A, Christensen H, Cuijpers P, Firth J, et al. Towards a consensus around standards for smartphone apps and digital mental health. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):97–8.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    • Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2016;4(2):e72 A commonly used tool for evaluating the quality of smarpthone apps. Can be used by clinicians, researchers or consumers.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Torous JB, Chan SR, Gipson SY-MT, Kim JW, Nguyen T-Q, Luo J, et al. A hierarchical framework for evaluation and informed decision making regarding smartphone apps for clinical care. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(5):498–500.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Torous J, Firth J. The digital placebo effect: mobile mental health meets clinical psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):100–2.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Gagnon M-P, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;23(1):212–20.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Luxton D, McCann R, Bush N, Mishkind M, Reger G. mHealth for mental health: integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2011;42(6):505.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Mohr DC, Lyon AR, Lattie EG, Reddy M, Schueller SM. Accelerating digital mental health research from early design and creation to successful implementation and sustainment. JMIR. 2017;19(5).Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mohr DC, Weingardt KR, Reddy M, Schueller SM. Three problems with current digital mental health research... and three things we can do about them. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(5):427–9.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Hewitt C, Brierley G, Tharmanathan P, Araya R, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2015;351:h5627.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Torous J, Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Firth J, Christensen H. Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018:ebmental-2018-102891.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Torous J, Staples P, Slaters L, Adams J, Sandoval L, Onnela J, et al. Characterizing smartphone engagement for schizophrenia: results of a naturalist mobile health study. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2017.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hoffman L, Benedetto E, Huang H, Grossman E, Kaluma D, Mann Z, et al. Augmenting mental health in primary care: a one-year study of deploying smartphone apps in a multi-site primary care/behavioral health integration program. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:94.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Mohr DC, Riper H, Schueller SM. A solution-focused research approach to achieve an implementable revolution in digital mental health. JAMA psychiatry. 2018;75(2):113–4.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    • Torous J, Roberts LW. The ethical use of mobile health technology in clinical psychiatry. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017;205(1):4–8 Provides good discussion and guidance regarding the ethical issues surrounding technology in mental health care.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Glenn T, Monteith S. Privacy in the digital world: medical and health data outside of HIPAA protections. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(11):494.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sunyaev A, Dehling T, Taylor PL, Mandl KD. Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;22(e1):e28–33.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kotz D, Gunter CA, Kumar S, Weiner JP. Privacy and security in mobile health: a research agenda. Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2016;49(6):22.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Armontrout J, Torous J, Fisher M, Drogin E, Gutheil T. Mobile mental health: navigating new rules and regulations for digital tools. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18(10):91.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Torous J, Chan S, Luo J, Boland R, Hilty D. Clinical informatics in psychiatric training: preparing today’s trainees for the already present future. Acad Psychiatry. 2017:1–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Mental HealthSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia
  2. 2.Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Youth Mental HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations