Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Update on Universal Adhesives: Indications and Limitations

  • Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan and P Cesar, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Oral Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the review

This article presents an overview of the so-called “Universal Adhesives”, which theoretically have the potential to simplify and expedite adhesive protocols, by providing flexibility about the etching approach and type of substrate, thus representing the state-of-the-art in adhesive dentistry. However, despite the claimed advantages of having a single adhesive for all uses, there is still controversial information about the most convenient techniques and indications for this type of adhesives. This review aimed to summarize the historic background and clinical indications of Universal Adhesives. Also, commercially available products and their compositions will be presented, and the most relevant results from laboratorial research and clinical trials using Universal Adhesives will be discussed.

Recent Findings

The 10-MDP monomer has become the standard reference for acid phosphate functional monomers, providing a high reactivity with metallic, ceramic, and mineral substrates. Nonetheless, manufacturers have developed several other functional monomers to provide “universal” bonding capabilities to their adhesives. In general, recent studies suggest that Universal Adhesives present acceptable survival rates on restorations of non-carious cervical lesions, for up to 5 years. However, there is a high incidence of marginal discoloration, which is even higher when the Universal Adhesives are applied with a self-etch technique. Thus, to reduce the problems associated with marginal discoloration, etching of enamel with phosphoric acid is recommended. Despite the advance in the study of Universal Adhesives, most clinical trials present limitations such as the application of low-sensitivity evaluation criteria and the use of non-carious cervical lesions as the main substrate for evaluation of the longevity of the restorations. However, analysis of the available in vitro and clinical evidence suggests that the acidic monomers on Universal Adhesives can produce adequate demineralization of the superficial dentin and may be applied safely to dentin with a self-etch technique, resulting in a predictable long-term performance.

Summary

The performance of Universal Adhesives to dental hard tissues and indirect restorative materials is material dependent because some of adhesives are not indicated for bonding to all types of restorative materials. Regarding adhesion to dental substrates, selective enamel etching with phosphoric acid prior to the application of Universal Adhesives can improve the bond strength and marginal sealing; however, laboratorial and clinical evidence suggest that using a self-etch technique in dentin is preferable because it is a simpler application technique and reduces the risk of sensitivity for the patient, without a significant prejudice to the long-term success rates of the restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. De Munck J, Shirai K, Yoshida Y, et al. Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to class I cavity dentin. Oper Dent. 2006;31:456–65. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, et al. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage. Open Dent J. 2016;10:268–77. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso GC, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, et al. Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Braz Dent J. 2019;30:467–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamura T, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, et al. Influence of a primer resembling universal adhesive on the bonding effectiveness of an experimental two-step self-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:635–46. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a45519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suh BI. Universal adhesives: the evolution of adhesive solutions continues. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2014;35:278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 43:765–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, et al. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol. 2017;8:1–17. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res - B Appl Biomater. 2019;107:2121–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305. (An overview on the applications and expected performance of universal adhesives for bonding to dental substrates and restorative materials)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardan L, Bourgi R, Kharouf N, et al. Bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers. 2021;13:814–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41:404–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine-old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gary A. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36:15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, et al. Six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with a new universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2016;41:465–80. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-309-C.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, et al. Defying ageing: an expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent. 2016;45:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scotti N, Cavalli G, Gagliani M, et al. New adhesives and bonding techniques. Why and when? Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12:524–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashi M. Adhesive dentistry: understanding the science and achieving clinical success. Dent Clin North Am. 2020;64:633–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2020.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, et al. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015;43:1229–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32:e9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Forgerini TV, Ribeiro JF, Rocha RO, et al. Role of etching mode on bonding longevity of a universal adhesive to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:69–75. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shafiei F, Mohammadparast P, Jowkar Z. Adhesion performance of a universal adhesive in the root canal: effect of etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch mode. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stape THS, Wik P, Mutluay MM, et al. Selective dentin etching: a potential method to improve bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;86:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.01.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaczor K, Gerula-Szymańska A, Smektała T, et al. Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;41:287–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan S. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruschel VC, Stolf SC, Shibata S, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 2019;32:223–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. •• de Paris MT, Perdigão J, de Paula E, et al. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: a randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater. 2020;36:1474–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007. (Provides an insight on the long term performance of a Universal Adhesive applied with different etching protocols)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016;32:1218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gutiérrez MF, Sutil E, Malaquias P, et al. Effect of self-curing activators and curing protocols on adhesive properties of universal adhesives bonded to dual-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2017;33:775–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maier E, Bordihn V, Belli R, et al. New Approaches in bonding to glass-ceramic: self-etch glass-ceramic primer and universal adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21:209–17. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malaquias P, Gutiérrez MF, Sutil E, et al. Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: adhesive properties. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20200121. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson-Hodges T, Kosaraju A, Arnason SC, et al. Bond strength of dual-cured resin cement used with dual-cured adhesives. Gen Dent. 2020;68:72–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayazıt EÖ. Repair of aged polymer-based CAD/CAM ceramics treated with different bonding protocols. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34:357–64. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsujimoto A, Shimatani Y, Nojiri K, et al. Influence of surface wetness on bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode. Eur J Oral Sci. 2019;127:162–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Latta MA, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, et al. Enamel and dentin bond durability of self-adhesive restorative materials. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a43996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. •• Fehrenbach J, Isolan CP, Münchow EA. Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2021;37:1463–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.014. (Recent systematic review highlighting the role of 10-MDP on the performance of different self-etch adhesives)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40:475–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vermelho PM, Reis AF, Ambrosano GMB, et al. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1707–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1966-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cruz J, Sousa B, Coito C, et al. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse modes of universal adhesives. Am J Dent. 2019;32:174–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014;42:603–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hidari T, Takamizawa T, Imai A, et al. Role of the functional monomer 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate in dentin bond durability of universal adhesives in etch-&-rinse mode. Dent Mater J. 2020;39:616–23. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42:800–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. •• Soto-Montero J, Nima G, Dias CTS, et al. Influence of beam homogenization on bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2020;37:e47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.003. (Explores the influence of light curing with multiple peak curing unit emitting beams with different levels of homogeneity on the long term bond strength to dentin of adhesives)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fabião AM, Fronza BM, André CB, et al. Microtensile dentin bond strength and interface morphology of different self-etching adhesives and universal adhesives applied in self-etching mode. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021;35:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA, et al. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Oral Sci. 2019;61:549–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, et al. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage. Open Dent J. 2016;10:268–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen H, Feng S, Jin Y, et al. Comparison of bond strength of universal adhesives using different etching modes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater J. 2022; 41:1–10 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-111. Online ahead of print.

  46. Makishi P, André CB, Ayres A, et al. Effect of storage time on bond strength and nanoleakage expression of universal adhesives bonded to dentin and etched enamel. Oper Dent. 2016;41:305–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, et al. Do matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the bond durability of universal dental adhesives? Scanning. 2016;38:535–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Takamizawa T, Imai A, Hirokane E, et al. SEM observation of novel characteristic of the dentin bond interfaces of universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2019;35:1791–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Passia N, Lehmann F, Freitag-Wolf S, et al. Tensile bond strength of different universal adhesive systems to lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146:729–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Makishi P, André CB, Silva JL, et al. Effect of storage time on bond strength performance of multimode adhesives to indirect resin composite and lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2016;41:541–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Romanini-Junior JC, Kumagai RY, Ortega LF, et al. Adhesive/silane application effects on bond strength durability to a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30:346–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. •• Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent. 2004;32:173–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.009. (Classic article that discusses the structural, mineral, and biological alterations present in sclerotic dentin, and the clinical challenges to obtain adhesion to this altered substrate)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012;28:72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ruschel VC, Shibata S, Stolf SC, Chung Y, Baratieri LN, Heymann HO, et al. Eighteen-month clinical study of universal adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2018;43:241–9. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-320-C.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. •• Josic U, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Radovic I, Jacimovic J, del Bianco F, et al. Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2021;37:e503–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.017. (Discusses the most relevant findings of randomized clinical trials using Universal adhesives, and addresses relevant aspects such as recommended etching approach, and methodological limitations)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was supported by grant #304692/2018–2 from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES — Finance Code 001), Brazil. The authors do not have a financial interest in products, equipment, and companies cited in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

    Marcelo Giannini, Paulo Moreira Vermelho & Vitaliano Gomes de Araújo Neto

  2. Operative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Costa Rica, Rodrigo Facio Campus, Montes de Oca, San Jose, Costa Rica

    Jorge Rodrigo Soto-Montero

Authors
  1. Marcelo Giannini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paulo Moreira Vermelho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vitaliano Gomes de Araújo Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jorge Rodrigo Soto-Montero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Rodrigo Soto-Montero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Dental Restorative Materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannini, M., Vermelho, P.M., de Araújo Neto, V.G. et al. An Update on Universal Adhesives: Indications and Limitations. Curr Oral Health Rep 9, 57–65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-022-00309-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-022-00309-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation