Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soft Tissue Grafting Around Implants: Why, When, and How?

  • Clinical Periodontics (P Stathopoulou, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Oral Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper discusses the role of soft tissue grafting around dental implants. The aim of this review is to present pertinent literature on peri-implant soft tissue including its role, indications for augmentation, techniques used to enhance the quality and/or quantity of the soft tissue, and corresponding timing of those procedures.

Recent Findings

Most reviewed soft tissue grafting studies in this paper were published in the last 5 years. However, the review also included older articles to mitigate the lack of recent randomized controlled trials or even case series on the reviewed soft tissue graft types. Soft tissue management with custom healing abutments or temporary restorations should be considered whenever possible. Soft tissue grafting to increase the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) seems to result in greater reduction of inflammation signs and a greater maintenance of crestal bone levels. The use of soft tissue grafts to increase soft tissue thickness tends to have a positive effect on maintaining crestal bone levels, especially when used to increase vertical thickness.

Summary

Apically positioned flaps (APFs) in combination with free gingival grafts (FGGs), subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs), or xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM) can significantly increase the KM width. Grafts to enhance facial tissue thickness lack evidence to support their long-term impact on mucosal marginal levels. Nonetheless, soft tissue manipulation is frequently performed at second-stage surgery to improve the facial thickness and esthetics. No clear advantages for the timing of soft tissue grafting with regard to clinical outcomes can be delineated when grafting is performed to increase KM or tissue thickness in simultaneous or staged approaches. The decision and timing to treat soft tissue defects should be based on risk assessment at the site and patient levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;7:CD003815. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Kekovic V, Goker F, Tumedei M, Wang HL. A systematic review of survival rates of osseointegrated implants in fully and partially edentulous patients following immediate loading. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122142.

  3. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):242–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around nonsubmerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(6):795–804. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(5):433–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2018;29(Suppl 15):32–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13114This review highlights the rationale for increasing vertical soft tissue thickness and width of keratinized mucosa equipped with best available evidence.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hämmerle CHF, Tarnow D. The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: a narrative review. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S291–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2014;29 Suppl:308–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2.

  11. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):2–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benic GI, Mokti M, Chen C-J, Weber H-P, Hämmerle CHF, Gallucci GO. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(5):560–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Gruber R, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Immediate implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the esthetic zone: 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):253–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zetu L, Wang H-L. Management of inter-dental/inter-implant papilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(7):831–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00748.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 1997;17(4):326–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Daftary F, Mahallati R, Bahat O, Sullivan RM. Lifelong craniofacial growth and the implications for osseointegrated implants. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2013;28(1):163–9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hilbe M, Hämmerle CH, Hüsler J, Jung RE. Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(10):874–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. • Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA, Sculean A. Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2016;20(7):1369–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2This study reviews most effective grafts and techniques to augment keratinized mucosa and tissue thickness at time of implant uncovery.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. • Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA, Sculean A. Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2017;21(1):53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2007-9This study reviews most effective grafts and techniques to augment keratinized mucosa and tissue thickness around healed and loaded implants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassetti M, Kaufmann R, Salvi GE, Sculean A, Bassetti R. Soft tissue grafting to improve the attached mucosa at dental implants: a review of the literature and proposal of a decision tree. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(6):499–510. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a33688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2(2):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020206.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(5):448–55. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290510.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennström J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1994;21(3):189–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1994.tb00302.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nevins M, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Kim DM. Connective tissue attachment to laser-microgrooved abutments: a human histologic case report. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2012;32(4):385–92.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Geurs NC, Geisinger ML, Vassilopoulos PJ, O'Neal SJ, Haigh SJ, Reddy MS. Optimizing connective tissue integration on laser-ablated implant abutments. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2016;6(3):153–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2016.150068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oh T-J, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang H-L. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002;73(3):322–33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(10):658–63. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.261005.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S313–s8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.17-0739.

  30. Roccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):491–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(2):323–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1170–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Yi YJ, Lee HJ, Kim SG, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(3):e24–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.010.

  34. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006;77(8):1410–20. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roos-Jansåker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33(4):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00908.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wennström JL, Derks J. Is there a need for keratinized mucosa around implants to maintain health and tissue stability? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):136–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02540.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Giannobile WV, Jung RE, Schwarz F. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 15):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S, Greenwell H, John V, Kim DM, et al. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 Suppl):S73–6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140377.

  39. Karring T, Lang NP, Loe H. The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiation. J Periodontal Res. 1975;10(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Han TJ, Takei HH, Carranza FA. The strip gingival autograft technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13(2):180–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, Wehrhan F, Schmitt J, Eitner S, et al. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013;84(7):914–23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120084.

  42. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, Schupbach P, Kim DM. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31(4):367–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(10):868–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01460.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Urban IA, Lozada JL, Nagy K, Sanz M. Treatment of severe mucogingival defects with a combination of strip gingival grafts and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35(3):345–53. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, Hunt J, Monafo W, Heimbach D, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17(2):124–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199603000-00006.

  46. Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol. 2005;76(2):178–86. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Scarano A, Barros RR, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Novaes AB Jr. Acellular dermal matrix graft for gingival augmentation: a preliminary clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation. J Periodontol. 2009;80(2):253–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jhaveri HM, Chavan MS, Tomar GB, Deshmukh VL, Wani MR, Miller PD Jr. Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study. J Periodontol. 2010;81(4):616–25. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Allen EP. AlloDerm: an effective alternative to palatal donor tissue for treatment of gingival recession. Dent Today. 2006;25(1):48, 50-2 quiz 2.

  50. Wei PC, Laurell L, Geivelis M, Lingen MW, Maddalozzo D. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. J Periodontol. 2000;71(8):1297–305. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.8.1297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bhatavadekar NB, Gharpure AS. Sequential ridge augmentation protocol for hard and soft tissue grafting in alveolar ridge deficiencies: a proposed evidence-based algorithm. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(2):153–60. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kadkhodazadeh M, Amid R, Kermani ME, Mirakhori M, Hosseinpour S. Timing of soft tissue management around dental implants: a suggested protocol. Gen Dent. 2017;65(3):50–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stimmelmayr M, Stangl M, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Clinical prospective study of a modified technique to extend the keratinized gingiva around implants in combination with ridge augmentation: one-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(5):1094–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft(®) ) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(11):e125–e33. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tunkel J, de Stavola L, Khoury F. Changes in soft tissue dimensions following three different techniques of stage-two surgery: a case series report. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2013;33(4):411–8. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.0616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jiang X, Lin Y. Gain of keratinized mucosa around implants in the posterior mandible by a modified apically positioned flap and xenogeneic collagen matrix. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(5):721–7. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Basegmez C, Ersanli S, Demirel K, Bölükbasi N, Yalcin S. The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of peri-implant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial. European journal of oral implantology. 2012;5(2):139–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Basegmez C, Karabuda ZC, Demirel K, Yalcin S. The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of peri-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial. European journal of oral implantology. 2013;6(2):145–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lorenzo R, García V, Orsini M, Martin C, Sanz M. Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(3):316–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02260.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Park J-B. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2006;15(3):275–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000227078.70869.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(10):971–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00520.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2006;85(5):473–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68(11):1117–30. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.11.1117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(6):602–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Karoussis IK, Brägger U, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(1):8–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00983.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):653–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL. Effects of platform-switching on peri-implant soft and hard tissue outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):e9–e24. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Santiago JF Jr, Batista VE, Verri FR, Honório HM, de Mello CC, Almeida DA, et al. Platform-switching implants and bone preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(3):332–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2006;26(1):9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu P-R, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short-span partial denture situations. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2009;29(6):599–605.

  71. Enkling N, Jöhren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1185–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02090.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Enkling N, Jöhren P, Katsoulis J, Bayer S, Jervøe-Storm PM, Mericske-Stern R, et al. Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: a three-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12 Suppl):139s–45s. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(9):2272–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1228–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. • Suárez-López Del Amo F, Lin GH, Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of soft tissue thickness on Peri-implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87(6):690–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150571This study reviews best evidence on the influence of vertical tissue thickness on crestal bone remodeling.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lin C-Y, Chen Z, Pan W-L, Wang H-L. Impact of timing on soft tissue augmentation during implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(5):508–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(2):123–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(4):712–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Linkeviciene L, Andrijauskas P, Puisys A. Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(7):716–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Gineviciute E, Linkeviciene L. The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12903.

  81. Wiesner G, Esposito M, Worthington H, Schlee M. Connective tissue grafts for thickening peri-implant tissues at implant placement. One-year results from an explanatory split-mouth randomised controlled clinical trial. European journal of oral implantology. 2010;3(1):27–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Puisys A, Zukauskas S, Kubilius R, Barbeck M, Razukevičius D, Linkevičiene L, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluations of porcine-derived collagen matrix membrane used for vertical soft tissue augmentation: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(3):341–7. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Tal H. Autogenous masticatory mucosal grafts in extraction socket seal procedures: a comparison between sockets grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(4):289–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hämmerle CH. Postextraction tissue management: a soft tissue punch technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24(6):545–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Covani U, Marconcini S, Galassini G, Cornelini R, Santini S, Barone A. Connective tissue graft used as a biologic barrier to cover an immediate implant. J Periodontol. 2007;78(8):1644–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Rotated palatal flap. A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in maxillary implant uncovering: technique and clinical evaluation. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2002;22(6):607–12.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. The palatal advanced flap: a pedicle flap for primary coverage of immediately placed implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(6):644–50. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130611.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Romanos AH, Geurs NC, Abou-Arraj RV. Pedicle connective tissue graft with novel palatal tunneling. Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2013;3(4):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2013.120125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Abou-Arraj RV, Geurs NC, Romanos AH. Autogenous options for soft-tissue management of extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla. Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2013;3(4):259–68. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2013.120126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Yoshino S, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2014;29(2):432–40. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post-extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(5):983–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Hutton CG, Johnson GK, Barwacz CA, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2018;89(7):807–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Lee CT, Tao CY, Stoupel J. The effect of subepithelial connective tissue graft placement on esthetic outcomes after immediate implant placement: systematic review. J Periodontol. 2016;87(2):156–67. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber H-P, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140–51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Man Y, Wang Y, Qu Y, Wang P, Gong P. A palatal roll envelope technique for peri-implant mucosa reconstruction: a prospective case series study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(5):660–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Minimally invasive technique for gingival augmentation around dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(2):187–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z. Interproximal papillae reconstruction in maxillary implants. J Periodontol. 2000;71(2):308–14. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Burkhardt R, Joss A, Lang NP. Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(5):451–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01497.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Roccuzzo M, Dalmasso P, Pittoni D, Roccuzzo A. Treatment of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around single implant: 5-year results from a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(4):1977–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2634-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(8):702–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Zucchelli G, Felice P, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Mounssif I, Monaco C, et al. 5-year outcomes after coverage of soft tissue dehiscence around single implants: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):215–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Anderson LE, Inglehart MR, El-Kholy K, Eber R, Wang H-L. Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2014;23(4):416–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Younes F, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Horizontal stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect of single implants: a 1-year prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(9):876–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Schallhorn RA, McClain PK, Charles A, Clem D, Newman MG. Evaluation of a porcine collagen matrix used to augment keratinized tissue and increase soft tissue thickness around existing dental implants. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2015;35, 99(1):–103. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1888.

  105. González-Martín O, Lee E, Weisgold A, Veltri M, Su H. Contour management of implant restorations for optimal emergence profiles: guidelines for immediate and delayed provisional restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(1):61–70. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Furze D, Byrne A, Alam S, Wittneben JG. Esthetic outcome of implant supported crowns with and without peri-implant conditioning using provisional fixed prosthesis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(6):1153–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(4):447–55. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Belser U, Buser D, Higginbottom F. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):73–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(6):566–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Block MS, Mercante DE, Lirette D, Mohamed W, Ryser M, Castellon P. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(11 Suppl):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Ruales-Carrera E, Pauletto P, Apaza-Bedoya K, Volpato CAM, Özcan M, Benfatti CAM. Peri-implant tissue management after immediate implant placement using a customized healing abutment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):533–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Perez A, Caiazzo A, Valente NA, Toti P, Alfonsi F, Barone A. Standard vs customized healing abutments with simultaneous bone grafting for tissue changes around immediate implants. 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(1):42–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Lops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, Cea N, Romeo E, Bressan E. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(10):1263–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(3):251–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Ioannidis A, Cathomen E, Jung RE, Fehmer V, Husler J, Thoma DS. Discoloration of the mucosa caused by different restorative materials - a spectrophotometric in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1133–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Park J. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2006;15(3):275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Wiesner G, Esposito M, Worthington H, Schlee M. Connective tissue grafts for thickening peri-implant tissues at implant placement. One-year results from an explanatory split-mouth randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(1):27–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Bienz SP, Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hämmerle CHF, Hüsler J, Thoma DS. Volumetric changes and peri-implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone, a retrospective case-control study with a 5-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1459–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramzi V. Abou-Arraj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article is a review of published studies and does not contain any reports with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors for the purpose of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Clinical Periodontics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abou-Arraj, R.V., Pizzini, A., Nasseh, P. et al. Soft Tissue Grafting Around Implants: Why, When, and How?. Curr Oral Health Rep 7, 381–396 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-020-00291-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-020-00291-1

Keywords

Navigation