Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Classroom Performance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Systematic Review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper systematically reviews the literature to determine if improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improves classroom performance in students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Methods

Six databases were searched for the terms acoustics, signal-to-noise ratio, classroom and ASD. Five studies were found that met the selection criteria.

Results

All five studies reported improving the SNR benefitted students with ASD in the classroom. Benefits included improved listening behaviours, increased on-task behaviours, improved speech recognition and reduced listening stress.

Conclusion

The evidence is suggestive that improving the SNR improves classroom performance in students with ASD. Limitations included the small number of studies and limited range of technologies considered. Further research should consider other technologies that could mitigate tactile sensitivities present in some students with ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acoustical Society of America (2000). Classroom acoustics. A resource for creating learning environments with desirable listening conditions. New York (NY): Author.

  • Adamson, A., O’Hare, A., & Graham, C. (2006). Impairments in sensory modulation in children with autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantara, J. I., Cope, T. E., Cope, W., & Weisblatt, E. J. (2012). Auditory temporal-envelope processing in high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1233–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Audiology (2011a). Clinical practice guidelines: remote microphone hearing assistance technologies for children and youth from birth to 21 years (includes supplement A). New York (NY): Author.

  • American Academy of Audiology (2011b). Supplement B: classroom audio distribution systems - selection and verification. New York (NY): Author.

  • American National Standards Institute (2002). S12.60.2002 [R2009]. Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools. New York, NY: Author.

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision).

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1995). Guidelines for acoustics in educational environments, 37(Suppl. 14), 15–19.

  • Anderson, K.L., Smaldino, J., & Spangler, C. (2012). Listening Inventory for Education—Revised (L.I.F.E.-R.)—student appraisal of listening difficulty. Retrieved September 18, 2016, from http://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/LIFE-R_Photo_-and_Question_Gallery_RE.pdf.

  • Anderson K.L., & Smaldino, J. (2014). Children’s home inventory of listening difficulties. Retrieved September 18, 2016, from http://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/tests.

  • Ashburner, J., Ziviani, J., & Rodger, S. (2008). Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and educational outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 564–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, J., Ziviani, J., & Rodger, S. (2010). Surviving in the mainstream: capacity of children with autism spectrum disorders to perform academically and regulate their emotions and behavior at school. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4(1), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants. (2010). Guideline for educational facilities acoustics. Sydney, Australia: Author.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009). Autism in Australia, 2009. Retrieved September 17, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4428.02009?OpenDocument

  • Autism Spectrum Australia (Aspect) (2012) We belong. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Autism Spectrum Australia (Aspect).

  • Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., Meldrum, D., & Charman, T. (2006). Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the special needs and autism project (SNAP). Lancet, 368(9531), 210–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2010). Prospective identification of autism spectrum disorders in infancy and toddlerhood using developmental surveillance: The social attention and communication study. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 31, 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Scott, F. J., Allison, C., Williams, J., Bolton, P., Matthews, F. E., & Brayne, C. (2009). Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194(6), 500–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetts, L. K., & Flynn, M. C. (2002). Improving the classroom listening skills of children with Down syndrome by using soundfield amplification. Down's Syndrome, Research and Practice, 8, 19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., Field, B., Foster, C., Platt, F., & Wertz, P. (1991). Effect of FM auditory trainers on attending behaviors of learning-disabled children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnel, A., Mottron, L., Peretz, I., Trudel, M., Gallun, E., & Bonnel, A. M. (2003). Enhanced pitch sensitivity in individuals with autism: a signal detection analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 226–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Community report on Autism. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/states/comm_report_autism_2014.pdf.

  • Christensen, D. L., Baio, J., Braun, K. V., Deborah, B., Charles, J., Constantino, J. N., & Yeargin-Allsopp, M. (2016). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Surveillence Summaries, 65(3), 1–23. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6503a1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC) (2016). Educational needs analysis. Retrieved October 23, 2016, from https://www.autismcrc.com.au/australian-education-needs-analysis.

  • Cox, R. M. (2005). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(7), 419–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crandell, C., & Bess, F. (1987). Sound-field amplification in the classroom setting. ASHA, 29, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePape, A. M. R., Hall, G. B. C., Tillmann, B., & Trainor, L. J. (2012). Auditory processing in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. PloS One, 7(9), e44084. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2006). Acoustical barriers in classrooms: the impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. (2012). The impact of sound-field systems on learning and attention in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4), 1163–1176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L. L. (1979). Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(3), 651–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L. L. (1982). Effects of noise on perception of speech by children and certain handicapped individuals. Sound and Vibration, 71, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etymotic Research (2005). Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise Test (Version 1.03) [Audio CD]. Elk Grove Village, IL: Author.

  • Falkmer, M., Granlund, M., Nilholm, C., & Falkmer, T. (2012). From my perspective—perceived participation in mainstream schools in students with autism spectrum conditions. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(3), 191–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flexer, C., Millin, J. P., & Brown, L. (1990). Children with developmental disabilities: The effect of sounds filed amplification on word identification. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, E. E., & Shield, B. M. (2011). A survey of acoustic conditions in semi-open plan classrooms in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(3), 1399–1410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haesen, B., Boets, B., & Wagemans, J. (2011). A review of behavioural and electrophysiological studies on auditory processing and speech perception in autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 701–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. N., John, A. B., Kreisman, N. V., Hall III, J. W., & Crandell, C. C. (2009). Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD). International Journal of Audiology, 48(6), 371–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kargas, N., Lopez, B., Reddy, V., & Morris, P. (2015). The relationship between auditory processing and restricted, repetitive behaviours in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 658–668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, D., Webster, A., & Ridley, G. (2015). How well are children with autism spectrum disorder doing academically at school? An overview of the literature. Autism, 20(3), 276–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, W. J., & Purdy, S. C. (2014). Assistive and therapeutic effects of amplification for auditory processing disorder. Seminars in Hearing, 35(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnealey, M., Pfeiffer, B., Miller, J., Roan, C., Shoener, R., & Ellner, M. L. (2012). Effect of classroom modification on attention and engagement of students with autism or dyspraxia. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(5), 511–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2006). Frequency of reading, math, and writing disabilities in children with clinical disorders. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massie, R., & Dillon, H. (2006). The impact of sound-field amplification in mainstream cross-cultural classrooms. Part 1. Educational outcomes. Australian Journal of Education, 50(1), 62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, G. M. (2009). Auditory processing disorders: can they be treated? Current Opinion in Neurology, 22, 137–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Dunn, W. (1999). Overview of the short sensory profile (SSP). In W. Dunn (Ed.), The sensory profile: examiner’s manual (pp. 59–73). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). PRISMA group preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nabelek, A., & Robinson, P. (1982). Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1242–1248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nabelek, A. K., Tucker, F. M., & Letowski, T. R. (1991). Toleration of background noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 679–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, I. G. (2002). A guide to systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29, 6–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. (2012). Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 836–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., Chisari, D., Saunders, K., & Rault, J.-L. (2017). Reducing listening-related stress in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3114-4.

  • Rance, G., Saunders, K., Carew, P., Johansson, M., & Tan, J. (2014). The use of listening devices to ameliorate auditory deficit in children with autism. Journal of Pediatrics, 164(2), 352–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S., Miller Kuhaneck, H., & Pfeiffer, B. (2016). Systematic review of the effectiveness of frequency modulation devices in improving academic outcomes in children with auditory processing difficulties. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Swain, D. (1999). Ross information processing assessment–primary (RIPA-P). Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, E. C., Mathews, L., Mehta, S., Hill, M., Munoz, A., Bishop, R., & Moloney, M. (2013). Personal FM systems for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an initial investigation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 30–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, E. C., Traber, J., Layden, P., Amin, A., Sanders, K., Bryant, D., & Baldus, N. (2014). Use of wireless technology for children with auditory processing disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and language disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 35(3), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, E. C., Wright, S., Anderson, C., Jones, J., Pitts, K., Bryant, D., Watson, M., Box, J., Neve, M., Mathews, L., & Reed, M. P. (2016). Technology evaluations: remote-microphone technology for children with autism Spectrum children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 64, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibein, G. W., Gold, M. A., Siebein, G. W., & Ermann, M. G. (2000). Ten ways to provide a high-quality acoustical environment in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals, fourth edition (CELF-4). Toronto: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shield, B. M., & Dockrell, J. E. (2003). The effects of noise on children at school: a review. Building Acoustics, 10(2), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaldino, J. J., & Crandell, C. C. (2000). Classroom amplification technology: theory and practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(4), 356–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoski, W. J., Brunt, M. A., & Tannahill, J. C. (1998). Children’s auditory performance scale (CHAPS). Tampa: Educational Audiology Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y. H., Xi, C. Y., Jiang, S. P., Shi, B. X., Wang, L. B., & Wang, L. (2012). Auditory abnormalities in children with autism. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomchek, S. D., & Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Updike, C. D. (2006). The use of FM systems for children with attention deficit disorder. Journal of Educational Audiology, 13, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, D. A., Backus, B. C., Macdonald, N. K., Rostamzadeh, N. K., Mason, N. K., Pandya, R., & Mahon, M. H. (2013). Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms. Ear and Hearing, 34(4), 491–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., MacDermott, S., Ridley, G., Glasson, E. J., & Wray, J. A. (2008). The prevalence of autism in Australia. Can it be established from existing data? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 44(9), 504–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J., Marinac, J., Pitty, K., & Burrows, C. (2011). The use of sound-field amplification devices in different types of classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(4), 395–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D., McPherson, B., Hickson, L., & Lawson, M. (1997). Preferred FM system listening levels of children with central auditory processing disorders. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 30, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC), established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yolanda van der Kruk.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Kruk, Y., Wilson, W.J., Palghat, K. et al. Improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Classroom Performance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Systematic Review. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 4, 243–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-017-0111-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-017-0111-7

Keywords

Navigation