Bistability and oscillations in co-repressive synthetic microbial consortia
Synthetic microbial consortia are conglomerations of genetically engineered microbes programmed to cooperatively bring about population-level phenotypes. By coordinating their activity, the constituent strains can display emergent behaviors that are difficult to engineer into isogenic populations. To do so, strains are engineered to communicate with one another through intercellular signaling pathways that depend on cell density.
Here, we used computational modeling to examine how the behavior of synthetic microbial consortia results from the interplay between population dynamics governed by cell growth and internal transcriptional dynamics governed by cell-cell signaling. Specifically, we examined a synthetic microbial consortium in which two strains each produce signals that down-regulate transcription in the other. Within a single strain this regulatory topology is called a “co-repressive toggle switch” and can lead to bistability.
We found that in co-repressive synthetic microbial consortia the existence and stability of different states depend on population-level dynamics. As the two strains passively compete for space within the colony, their relative fractions fluctuate and thus alter the strengths of intercellular signals. These fluctuations drive the consortium to alternative equilibria. Additionally, if the growth rates of the strains depend on their transcriptional states, an additional feedback loop is created that can generate oscillations.
Our findings demonstrate that the dynamics of microbial consortia cannot be predicted from their regulatory topologies alone, but are also determined by interactions between the strains. Therefore, when designing synthetic microbial consortia that use intercellular signaling, one must account for growth variations caused by the production of protein.
Keywordssynthetic biology microbial consortia quorum sensing relaxation oscillations
- 3.Masiello, C. A., Chen, Y., Gao, X., Liu, S., Cheng, H.-Y., Bennett, M. R., Rudgers, J. A., Wagner, D. S., Zygourakis, K. Z. and Silberg, J. J. (2013) Biochar and microbial signaling: production conditions determine effects on microbial communication. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11496–11503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Miller, M. B. and Bassler, B. L. (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 333, 1315–1319Google Scholar
- 25.Nowak, M. A. (2006) Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life. Brighton: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar