Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of identity in South Korea’s policies towards Japan

  • Published:
Korean Social Science Journal

Abstract

This paper asks why South Korea’s relations with Japan is so vulnerable to disputes over history in the post-Cold War period. It argues that South Korea’s identities vis-à-vis Japan and North Korea respectively conflict with each other and leads to inconsistent policy towards Japan that hovers between cooperation and discord. By analyzing South Korea’s relations with Japan as well as its policies and behavior in the post-Cold War period, this paper aims to show how identity factor affects a state’s foreign policy and behavior towards other states. In doing so, it questions the rationality assumption of state behavior in IR and offers alternative explanations on how to better understand “emotional” foreign policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, D. J. (2014). Memory and trauma as elements of identity in foreign policymaking. In E. Resende & D. Budryte (Eds.), Memory and trauma in international relations: Theories, cases and debates (pp. 57–73). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bong, Y. (2004). Thinking outside the box: Asking the Tokdo question using theories and comparisons. Korea Observer, 35(1), 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2013). Chinese diplomacy with emotional characteristics. The Diplomat. August 20, 2013. Retrieved November 1, 2016 from http://thediplomat.com/2013/08/chinese-diplomacy-with-emotional-characteristics/

  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. (2011). Changing South Korea issues of identity and reunification in formulating the Australia-Korea security policy. Korea Observer, 42(1), 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha, V. (1999). Alignment despite antagonism: The United States-Korea-Japan security triangle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. K. (2010). Sunshine over a barren soil: The domestic politics of engagement identity formation in South Korea. Asian Perspective, 34(4), 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution of the Republic of Korea (1987). Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=61603&urlMode=engLsInfoR&viewCls=engLsInfoR#0000.

  • Dittmer, L. (1981). The strategic triangle: An elementary game-theoretical analysis. World Politics, 33(4), 485–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamm, P. (2015). Outgrowing the predicament? National Identity and Seoul’s Dokdo Policy Pacific Focus, XXX(2), 200–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glosserman, B., & Snyder, S. A. (2015). The Japan-South Korea identity clash: East Asian security and the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hankook Ilbo. (2010a). Public Opinion Poll ‘Hatoyama Administration No Different’ Only 18% Trust Japan, April 16.

  • Hankook Ilbo. (2010b). Public Opinion Poll ‘61% of Koreans Prefer Dialogue, 58% of Japanese Prefer Pressure in North Korean Nuclear Issue, April 16.

  • Hankyoreh. (2008). Full text of Lee’s inaugural speech. Chicago: CNA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herald Economy. (2005). Government and Opposition Parties Unify Criticisms Against Takeshima Day. March 16. Retrieved November 2, 2016 from http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=100&oid=016&aid=0000166210

  • Horowitz, S. (2016). South Korea and Japan since World War II: Between ideological discord and pragmatic cooperation. Pacific Focus, XXXI(1), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, D. (2010). The nature and determinants of South Korea’s foreign policy, In T. Hahm & G. N. Gung (Eds.), South Korean foreign policy: History and problems (pp. 56–81). Seoul: Sahoepyongron.

  • Kazuyo, O. (2004). The relations of Korea and Japan as represented by a legend. Asia Pacific Study Reports, 13, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2011). The role of political leadership in the formation of Korea-Japan relations in the post-Cold War Era. Asian Perspective, 35(1), 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y. (2014). Escaping the vicious cycle: Symbolic politics and history disputes between South Korea and Japan. Asian Perspective, 38(1), 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2015). Cooperation and discord in Korea-Japan foreign trade policy. In D-H, Kim & M. Abe (Eds.), History of Korea-Japan relations 1965–2015: II economy, Seoul: Yoksagonggan.

  • Kimura, K. (2011). How can we cope with historical disputes? The Japanese and South Korean experience. In M. Soderberg (Ed.), Changing power relations in Northeast Asia: Implications for relations between Japan and South Korea. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, M. (2015). Rational emotions: The role of identity and emotions in Dokdo/Takeshima dispute between South Korea and Japan. EPIK Journals Online, 6(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (1985). Japan and Korea: The political dimension. California: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (2006). The structure of Korea-Japan historical conflict and its possible solutions. In Y. Kim & W. Lee (Eds.), What is Japan to Korea?. Seoul: Hanwool Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (2015). Introduction: Understanding the 50 years of Korea-Japan relations under ‘1965 system’. In W. Lee & T. Kimiya (Eds.), History of Korea-Japan relations, 1965–2015: Volume I politics (pp. 12–27). Seoul: Yoksa Gonggan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenheim, O., & Heimann, G. (2008). Revenge in international politics. Security Studies, 17(4), 685–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (1995). Anarchy and identity. International Organization, 49(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midford, P. (2011). Historical memory versus democratic reassurance: The security relationship between Japan and South Korea. In M. Soderberg (Ed.), Changing power relations in Northeast Asia: Implications for relations between Japan and South Korea. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Korea. (2006). Special message by President Roh Moo-hyun on Korea-Japan relations, Retrieved May 15, 2016 from MOFA website: http://www.mofa.go.kr/webmodule/htsboard/template/read/korboardread.jsp?t ypeID=12&boardid=514&seqno=304487

  • Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsu, H. (2014). Patterns of escalation in historical and territorial disputes in Japan-ROK relations, MA Thesis, Seoul National University.

  • Onishi, Y. (2015). Cooperating the local governments between Korea and Japan: The strategy of sister city partnership. Korea and World Politics, 31(1), 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.-G. (2008). A study on norms diffusion of the Korea-japan conflict over the territorial problem: Focusing on the declaration of “Dakeshima Day” and “Daemado Day”. Gukjaejeongchinonchong, 48(4), 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. H. (2009). The pattern of cooperation and conflict between Korea and Japan: Theoretical expectations and empirical realities. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 10(3), 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollmann, M. (2015). The troubled Japan-South Korea relationship, July 27. Retrieved September 20, 2015 from The Diplomat website: http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/the-troubled-japan-south-korea-relationship/?allpages=yes&print=yes.

  • Presidential Blue House. (2009). Global Korea: The national security strategy of the Republic of Korea. Seoul: Cheong wa dae.

  • Robertson, J. (2016). Diplomatic style and foreign policy: A case study of South Korea. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozman, G. (2013). National identities and bilateral relations: Widening gaps in East Asia and Chinese demonization of the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, Y. (2011). Identity and security: Identity distance theory and regional affairs in Northeast and Southeast Asia. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Schilling, C. L. (2015). Emotional state theory: Friendship and fear in Israeli foreign policy. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, G.-W. (2006). Ethnic nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, politics, and legacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, G.-W. (2012). Identity politics and policy disputes in U.S.-Korea relations. Political Science Quarterly, 127(2), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. (2013). Engagement? containment? The role of identity in the formation of South Korea’s policy toward Pyongyang. North Korean Review, 9(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. (2015). Beyond identity and domestic politics: Stability in South Korea-Japan relations. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 27(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1991). National identity. Nevada: University of Nevada Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, B. (2008). Ontological security in international relations. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (2012). Current emotion research in sociology: Advances in the discipline. Emotion Review, 4(3), 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2005). New directions in identity control theory. Advances in Group Process, 22, 326–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamaki, T. (2010). Deconstructing Japan’s image of South Korea: Identity in foreign policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. (2008). South Korea and Japan’s frictions over history: A linguistic constructivist reading. Asian Perspective, 32(3), 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K., & Cho, S.-K. (2013). The structure of disputes over Dokdo/Takeshima: The interaction of power balances and policy preference. Ilbon Yongu Nonjib, 37, 205–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonhap News. (2000). President Kim ‘Cooperation with Japan necessary for North-South Korea Development’, September 23.

  • Yonhap News. (2006). Blue house, ‘Japan Shows Expansionist Tendency, July 11.

  • Yonhap News. (2015). Kim Young-sam Era: 7. Hardline policy towards Japan. November 22. Retrieved November 2, 2016 from http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2015/11/22/0200000000AKR20151122032500014.HTML

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Minseon Ku

Authors
  1. Minseon Ku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minseon Ku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ku, M. The role of identity in South Korea’s policies towards Japan. Korean Soc Sci J 43, 75–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40483-016-0033-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40483-016-0033-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation