Abstract
Purpose
Despite progressive implementation of image-guided point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) in guidelines as an alternative to transient elastography for the staging of fibrotic liver disease, pSWE is not widely adopted in clinical workflow. More information on reliability and validity of pSWE systems is needed. Therefore, we performed a phantom study to evaluate the validity and reliability of pSWE with ultrasound systems.
Methods
Validity and reliability of pSWE measurements from three ultrasound systems were evaluated. Measurements were performed on an elasticity phantom with reference elasticities of 7 ± 1 (low) (median ± interquartile range (IQR)), 14 ± 2 (medium) and 26 ± 3 (high) kPa. Measurements were repeated in tenfold for each reference at 2, 3 and 4 cm depth. Results were considered valid when median elasticity ± IQR was between the uncertainty limits (IQR) for each reference elasticity value and reliable when IQR/median < 0.30.
Results
pSWE with the systems provided valid results for all reference elasticities and focal depths, except for overestimation of high reference elasticity at 2 and 4 cm depth for one system (41.5 ± 4.3 and 39.0 ± 1.2 kPa, respectively). Measurements were reliable with a maximum IQR/median of 0.13, well below the guideline of IQR/median < 0.30.
Discussion
The results support the use of pSWE as an alternative to invasive or non-image guided noninvasive techniques for liver fibrotic staging.
Conclusions
pSWE with ultrasound systems from different vendors is valid and reliable and can therefore be implemented to optimize clinical workflow by performing imaging and elastography simultaneously.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ARFI:
-
Acoustic radiation force impulse
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- pSWE:
-
Point-shear wave elastography
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- TE:
-
Transient elastography
- USE:
-
Ultrasound elastography
References
Bedossa P, Poynard T (1996) An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 24:289–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240201. (10.1002/hep.510240201)
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, El Kaffas A, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics. 7:1303 (Ivyspring International Publisher)
Kose S, Ersan G, Tatar B, Adar P, Sengel BE (2015) Evaluation of percutaneous liver biopsy complications in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Eurasian J Med. 47:161 (Ataturk University School of Medicine)
Dietrich C, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L et al (2017) EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography, update 2017 (long version) EFSUMB-leitlinien und empfehlungen zur klinischen anwendung der leberelastographie, update 2017 (langversion). EFSUMB Guidel Ultraschall Med. 38:16–47. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103952
Ferraioli G, Filice C, Castera L, Choi BI, Sporea I, Wilson SR et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 3: liver. Ultrasound Med Biol. Elsevier 41:1161–79
Ophir J, Ccspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 13:111–34
Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Hall TJ, Bamber JC, Barr RG et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. Elsevier 41:1126–47
Kamaya A, Machtaler S, Safari Sanjani S, Nikoozadeh A, Graham Sommer F, Khuri-Yakub BT et al (2013) New Technologies in Clinical Ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol. 48:214–23
Barr RG, Wilson SR, Rubens D, Garcia-Tsao G, Ferraioli G (2020) Update to the society of radiologists in ultrasound liver elastography consensus statement. Radiology 296:263–74. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192437
Dam-Vervloet AJ, Dommelen RC van, Dalen J van, Wouden E van der, Boomsma MF, Poot L. Comparison of staging liver fibrosis between two elastography systems. ECR2018. 2018.
Warringa N, Dam-Vervloet AJ, Boomsma MF (2021) Assessment of liver fibrosis with elastography point quantification versus transient elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 19:618–9
Conti F, Mochel F, Calmus Y (2019) Domino liver transplantation: the risk of disease recurrence. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 43:510–2
Ferraioli G, De Silvestri A, Reiberger T, Taylor-Robinson SD, de Knegt RJ, Maiocchi L et al (2018) Adherence to quality criteria improves concordance between transient elastography and ElastPQ for liver stiffness assessment—a multicenter retrospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 50:1056–61
Bâldea V, Sporea I, Tudor A, Popescu A, Bende F, Șirli R (2020) Virtual touch quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging technology versus transient elastography for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B or C using liver biopsy as the gold standard. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 29:181–90
Summers JA, Radhakrishnan M, Morris E, Chalkidou A, Rua T, Patel A et al (2017) Virtual TouchTM quantification to diagnose and monitor liver fibrosis in hepatitis B and hepatitis C: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 15:139–54
Ferraioli G (2019) Review of liver elastography guidelines. J Ultrasound Med. 38:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14856
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the department of Radiology of St Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands for kindly providing the Siemens Acuson Sequoia ultrasound systems.
Funding
The authors declare that no funding, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SB: investigation, writing—final draft; MG: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, data curation, writing—first draft, visualization; AD & ML: methodology, writing—review & editing, supervision; IN: formal analysis, writing—review & editing; EW, MB & LP: writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bergsma, S., van Gent, M., Dam-Vervloet, A.J. et al. Image-guided point-shear-wave elastography: a valid and reliable technique for liver fibrotic staging. J Ultrasound (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-023-00854-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-023-00854-9