Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experience of an isolated use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on fracture healing in established non-unions: a prospective case series

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture non-unions are responsible for approximately 5% of cases, with low expectation of spontaneous healing thereafter. The fractures that heal without complications can take months to heal completely. An ultrasound, typically at low intensities (0.5–50 mW/cm2), serves a diagnostic purpose, whereas at higher intensities (0.2–100 W/cm2), its role becomes more therapeutic by generating heat energy. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is frequently used to stimulate or to accelerate fracture healing. We present a prospective review of fracture non-unions treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). We enrolled 66 patients during August 2016 and December 2018, 38 males and 28 females; age range 19–85 years (average 49.2 years). All these patients were followed up to minimum 6 months. The average time of referral post-treatment for fractures was 8.2 months (range 6–18 months). Four patients were excluded due to various reasons. 39 out of 62 fractures showed successful healing with symptom improvement and callus formation with 67% success rate. In this case series, we noted LIPUS therapy failure in the post-ORIF scaphoid fracture and post-ankle joint fusion non-union. We did not observe any influence of a medical condition such as diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis or personal habits like smoking. The LIPUS therapy appears to have influence on bone healing, depending on the onset of therapy, fracture type and the approach to fracture care. In this case series, the compliant group showed 67% successful outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bashardoust Tajali S, Houghton P, MacDermid JC, Grewal R (2012) Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on frature healing: a systematic review and metanalysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91(4):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbuto L, Marco DS, Nicoletta DV, Gaetano R, Francesco E, Norberto V, Federica F, Maria GC, Elena AV, Valeria R, Gianfrano V (2019) Paediatric musculoskeletal ultrasound: a pictorial essay. J Ultrasound 22:491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang KV, Wu WT, Huang KC, Jan WH, Han DS (2018) Limb muscle quality and quantity in elderly adults with dynapenia but not sarcopenia: An ultrasound imaging study. Exp Gerontol. 108:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gebauer D, Mayr E, Orthner E, Ryaby JP (2005) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: effects on nonunions. Ultrasound Med Biol 31(10):1391–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hannermann PF, Mommers EH, Schots JP, Brink PR, Poeze M (2014) The effect of low- intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic fileds bone growth stimulation in acute farctures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(8):1093–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jingushi S, Mizuno K, Matshushita T, Itoman M (2007) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for postoperative delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures. J Orthop Sci 12(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leighton R, Watson JT, Giannoudis P, Papakostidis C, Harrison A, Steen RG (2017) Healing of fracture nonunions treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 48(7):1339–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malerba P, Kaminstein D, Brunetti E, Manciulli T (2020) Is there a role for bedside ultrasound in malaria? A survey of the literature. J Ultrasound. 23(1):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N (2009) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for the treatment of bone delayed union or nonuinon: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(4):529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rutten S, Bekerom MP, Sierevelt IN, Nolte PA (2016) Enhancement of bone-healing by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 4(3):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uchiyama Y, Nakamura Y, Mochida J, Tamaki T (2007) Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for delayed and non-union stress fractures of the anterior mid- tibia in five athletes. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 32(4):121–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang JC, Chang KV, Wu WT, Han DS, Ozcakar L (2019) Ultrasound-guided standard vs dual-target subacromial corticosteroid injections for shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 100(11):2119–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe Y, Arai Y, Takenaka N, Kobayashi M, Matsushita T (2013) Three key factors affecting treatment results of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for delayed unions and nonunions: instability, gap size and atrophic non-union. J Orthop Sci. 18(5):803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou S, Bachem MG, Seufferlein T, Li Y, Gross HJ, Schmelz A (2008) Low intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates macrophage phagocytosis by a pathway that requires actin polymerization, Rho, and Src/MAPKs activity. Cell Signal 20(4):695–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Bawale.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

This is to state that no authors have any disclosures or conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bawale, R., Segmeister, M., Sinha, S. et al. Experience of an isolated use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on fracture healing in established non-unions: a prospective case series. J Ultrasound 24, 249–252 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00464-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00464-9

Keywords

Navigation