Skip to main content
Log in

Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

Pneumothorax (PNX) detection is of the utmost clinical relevance because it may quickly progress to cause hemodynamic instability as a consequence of invasive ventilation. Radiography is characterized by a low sensitivity to detect this disease; in recent years, chest ultrasound (US) has gained increased visibility in the diagnosis of acute respiratory emergencies including PNX. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (E-FAST) during the past 6 years of experience with this technique in our Level I trauma center.

Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2018, we performed a retrospective case-series study including 3320 consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department of our hospital because of major trauma. Extended-US was always performed and reported immediately after FAST during primary survey and before multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans. The presence of PNX was determined using the well-known accepted US criteria. US findings were compared with computed tomography (CT) findings, the reference standard for PNX detection.

Results

Of the 6640 lungs observed with E-FAST, there were 1244 PNX cases, while 1328 PNX cases were detected either on the basis of MDCT or on the basis of the presence of air flush during the thoracic decompression in the emergency room. Among the 84 false negatives, 12 patients had subcutaneous emphysema, 38 had a body mass index higher than 27, 6 had a thoracic wall hematoma, and 4 had chest penetrating trauma. There were 10 false positives in the diagnosis of PNX at US examination, with mild extension and not clinically significant. The overall sensitivity of E-FAST for PNX detection was 93.6% (1244/1328), the specificity of E-FAST was 99.8% (5312/5322), the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.4% (5312/5396), and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 99.2% (1328/1338).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that bedside thoracic US is characterized by a very good accuracy in the diagnostic work-up of major trauma patients, even in difficult conditions, allowing rapid diagnosis of PNX.

Advances in knowledge

The novelty of this research lies in the possibility of diagnosing potential life-threatening conditions in a very short time by means of US, thus proposing a revision of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines in order to incorporate it in the work-up of high-energy injured patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

(modified from Volpicelli et al., Intensive Care 2010)

Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB et al (2004) Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma 57:288–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S et al (2008) Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest 133:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkerson RG, Stone MB (2009) Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of Pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med 17(1):11–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00628.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, Chiu WC et al (1999) Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference. J Trauma 46:466–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding W, Shen Y, Yang J, He X, Zhang M (2011) Diagnosis of pneumothorax by radiography and ultrasonography: a meta-analysis. Chest 140:859–866. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-2946Epub 2011 May 5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saucier S, Motyka C, Killu K (2010) Ultrasonography versus chest radiography after chest tube removal for the detection of pneumothorax. AACN Adv Crit Care 21(1):34–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/nci.0b013e3181c8013a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S (2005) A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med 12(9):844–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holmes JF, Brant WE, Bogren HG, London KL, Kuppermann N (2001) Prevalence and importance of pneumothoraces visualized on abdominal computed tomographic scan in children with blunt trauma. J Trauma 50(3):516–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xirouchaki N, Magkanas E, Vaporidi K et al (2011) Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography. Intensive Care Med 37(9):1488–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2317-yEpub 2011 Aug 2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soccorsa S (2013) Bedside US imaging in multiple trauma patients. Part 1: US findings and techniques. J Ultrasound. 16(4):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soar J, Nolan JP, Bottiger BW et al (2015) European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 95:100–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Korner M, Krotz MM, Degenhart C, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Linsenmaier U (2008) Current role of emergency US in patients with major trauma. Radiographics 28:225–242. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.281075047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassan M, Rizk R, Essam M, Abouelnour A (2017) Validation of equations for pleural effusion volume estimation by ultrasonography. J Ultrasound 20(4):267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lichtenstein DA, Menu Y et al (1995) A bedside ultrasound sign ruling-out pneumothorax in the critically ill. Lung sliding. Chest 108:1345–1348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowan KR, Kirkpatrick AW, Liu D, Forkheim K, Mayo JR, Nicolaou S (2002) Traumatic pneumothorax detection with thoracic US: correlation with chest radiography and CT—initial experience. Radiology 225(1):210–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang M, Liu ZH, Yang JX, Gan JX, Xu SW, You XD, Jiang GY (2006) Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma. Crit Care 10:R112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ianniello S, Piccolo CL, Buquicchio GL, Trinci M, Miele V (2016) First-line diagnosis of paediatric pneumonia in emergency: lung ultrasound (LUS) in addition to chest-X-ray (CXR) and its role in follow-up. Br J Radiol. 89(1061):20150998. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150998(Epub 2016 Jan 22)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Volpicelli G (2011) Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 37(2):224–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2079-y(Epub 2010 Nov 20)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garofalo G, Busso M, Perotto F, De Pascale A, Fava C (2006) Ultrasound diagnosis of pneumothorax. Radiol Med 111:516–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lichtenstein DA, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A, Barrè O (1997) The comet tail artifact. An ultrasound sign of alveolar-interstizial syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 156:1640–1646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lichtenstein DA, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A (2000) The lung point: an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med 26:1434–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichtenstein DA (2007) Ultrasound in the management of thoracic disease. Crit Care Med 35:S250–S261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M et al (2012) International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 38:577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miele V, Andreoli C, Grassi R (2006) The management of emergency radiology: key facts. Eur J Radiol 59:311–314 (Epub 2006 Jun 27)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson SW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA (2006) Sixtyfour multi-detector row computed tomography in multitrauma patient imaging: early experience. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 35:188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lomoschitz FM, Eisenhuber E, Linnau KF, Peloschek P, Schoder M, Bankier AA (2003) Imaging of chest trauma: radiological patterns of injury and diagnostic algorithms. Eur J Radiol 48:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hammer S, Kroft LJ, Hidalgo AL, Leta R, de Roos A (2015) Chest CT examination in patients presenting with acute chest pain: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 6:719–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0429-6(Epub 2015 Sep 15)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Reissig A, Copetti R, Kroegel C (2011) Current role of emergency ultrasound of the chest. Crit Care Med 39(4):839–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ojaghi Haghighi SH, Adimi I, Shams Vahdati S, Sarkhoshi Khiavi R (2014) Ultrasonographic diagnosis of suspected hemopneumothorax in trauma patients. Trauma Mon 19(4):e17498. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.17498(Epub 2014 Sep 10)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar S, Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK (2015) Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of pneumothorax following transbronchial lung biopsy. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol 22(1):14–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ku BS, Fields JM, Carr B, Everett WW, Gracias VH, Dean AJ (2013) Clinician-performed beside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. West J Emerg Med. 14(2):103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ianniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B, Miele V (2014) First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Radiol Med 119(9):674–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0384-1Epub 2014 Jan 28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hyacinthe AC, Broux C, Francony G, Genty C, Bouzat P, Jacquot C et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the acute assessment of common thoracic lesions after trauma. Chest 141:1177–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rocco M, Carbone I, Morelli A et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: feasibility of detecting pulmonary effusion and lung contusion in patients on respiratory support after severe blunt thoracic trauma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 52(6):776–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ashton-Cleary DT (2013) Is thoracic ultrasound a viable alternative to conventional imaging in the critical care setting? Br J Anaesth 111(2):152–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chan SS (2003) Emergency bedside ultrasound to detect pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med 10(1):91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Volpicelli G (2011) The double lung point. Am J Emerg Med 29(7):832–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chung MJ, Goo JM, Im JG, Cho JM, Cho SB, Kim SJ (2005) Value of high-resolution ultrasound in detecting a pneumothorax. Eur Radiol 15:930–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Langdorf MI, Medak AJ, Hendey GW et al (2015) Prevalence and clinical import of thoracic injury identified by chest computed tomography but not chest radiography in blunt trauma: multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Emerg Med 66(6):589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.003(Epub 2015 Jul 11)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolfman NT, Gilpin JW, Bechtold RE, Meredith JW, Ditesheim JA (1993) Occult pneumothorax in patients with abdominal trauma: CT studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 17(1):56–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Feliciano DV (2009) The occult pneumothorax: what have we learned? Can J Surg 52(5):E173–E179

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ball CG, Dente CJ, Kirkpatrick AW et al (2010) Occult pneumothoraces in patients with penetrating trauma: does mechanism matter? Can J Surg 53(4):251–255

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Laupland KB et al (2005) Factors related to the failure of radiographic recognition of occult posttraumatic pneumothoraces. Am J Surg 189(5):541–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Laupland KB et al (2005) Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for occult pneumothoraces in victims of major trauma. J Trauma 59(4):917–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yadav K, Jalili M, Zehtabchi S (2010) Management of traumatic occult pneumothorax. Resuscitation. 81(9):1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Alrajab S, Alrajab A, Assaad U (2012) Bedside ultrasonography for evaluation of pneumothorax. Chest. 141:827–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Richards JR, McGahan JP (2017) Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) in 2017: what radiologists can learn. Radiology 283(1):30–48. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017160107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Alrajhi K, Woo MY, Vaillancourt C (2012) Test characteristics of ultrasonography for the detection of pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 141(3):703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nandipati KC, Allameni S, Kakarla R, Wong A, Richards N, Satterfield J et al (2011) Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) in the diagnosis of pneumothorax: experience at a community based level I trauma center. Injury 42:511–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Michalke JA (2012) An overview of emergency ultrasound in the United States. World J Emerg Med. 3(2):85–90. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2012.02.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Abdulrahman Y, Musthafa S, Hakim SY et al (2015) Utility of extended FAST in blunt chest trauma: is it the time to be used in the ATLS algorithm? World J Surg 39(1):172–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2781-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SI and VM performed the data interpretation and the critical revision. CL Piccolo contributed to the writing of the study, the study design data analysis and data interpretation. MT and CAA-C contributed to literature search and critical revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Ianniello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No patient information is included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ianniello, S., Piccolo, C.L., Trinci, M. et al. Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach?. J Ultrasound 22, 461–469 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00410-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00410-4

Keywords

Navigation