Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genomic Epidemiology and Recent Update on Nucleic Acid–Based Diagnostics for COVID-19

Current Tropical Medicine Reports volume 7, pages 113–119 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

The SARS-CoV-2 genome has been sequenced and the data is made available in the public domain. Molecular epidemiological investigators have utilized this information to elucidate the origin, mode of transmission, and contact tracing of SARS-CoV-2. The present review aims to highlight the recent advancements in the molecular epidemiological studies along with updating recent advancements in the molecular (nucleic acid based) diagnostics for COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Recent Findings

Epidemiological studies with the integration of molecular genetics principles and tools are now mainly focused on the elucidation of molecular pathology of COVID-19. Molecular epidemiological studies have discovered the mutability of SARS-CoV-2 which is of utmost importance for the development of therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19. The whole world is now participating in the race for development of better and rapid diagnostics and therapeutics for COVID-19. Several molecular diagnostic techniques have been developed for accurate and precise diagnosis of COVID-19.

Summary

Novel genomic techniques have helped in the understanding of the disease pathology, origin, and spread of COVID-19. The whole genome sequence established in the initial days of the outbreak has enabled to identify the virus taxonomy. Several rapid, accurate, and sensitive diagnostic methods have been developed; those are based on the principle of detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids in clinical samples. Most of these molecular diagnostics are based on RT-PCR principle.

Introduction

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic became a global concern within a few months of the first report of the disease in December, 2019 in Wuhan, China. Soon, COVID-19, the zoonotic disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, became the major focus in almost all the fields of biological sciences. Scientists and researches all over the globe started investigating the molecular pathogenesis of the disease. The major disciplines of biological sciences such as molecular genomics, virology, and especially the molecular epidemiological discipline have been affected widely [1,2,3]. Several diagnostic methods have been developed as a result of the investigation and elucidation of the genomic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 and the knowledge about its evolutionary history. The present review summarizes the molecular epidemiological studies related to COVID-19 and the recent advancements in the development of molecular diagnostics for COVID-19.

Molecular Epidemiology of COVID-19

The International Association of Epidemiology defines molecular epidemiology as “the application of epidemiologic principles to study the molecular, biochemical, cellular and genetic mechanisms that underlie the pathophysiology, etiology and prevention of human diseases and related outcomes, as well as their early detection, treatment, or prognosis”.

The application of systems biology, genomics, molecular, and cell biology techniques in epidemiology discipline has revolutionized the field of epidemiology and this has given a new discipline altogether called molecular epidemiology. This integrated multidisciplinary approach has resulted in the discovery of several novel biomarkers (genomic) to trace various infectious diseases. Also, molecular epidemiological studies have explored the etiology of several diseases providing detailed knowledge about the molecular pathology and disease progression. Ultimately, these contributions of the molecular epidemiological studies help design preventive strategies and management protocols [4]. Rapid advancements in sequencing technologies have further advanced the field of molecular epidemiology. The traditional molecular techniques have been made high throughput with these advancements. Therefore, these high throughput molecular sequencing-based technologies have started replacing the traditional molecular diagnostics and this has made the epidemiological investigations of the infectious diseases more rapid, specific, and sensitive. Sequencing and analysis of the whole genomic sequence of the pathogens in comparison with the already available database of sequences can increase the speed and accuracy of the epidemiological studies, thereby helping in the investigations of the disease pathogenesis and ways to tackle the infectious diseases [5].

Novel genomic techniques have helped in the understanding of the disease pathology, origin, and spread of COVID-19. The whole genome sequence established in the initial days of the outbreak has enabled to identify the virus taxonomy. These molecular tools have established that SARS-CoV-2 belongs to betacoronavirus family and shows clear divergence from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [6,7,8]. Application of a combination of genomic tools and phylogenetic analysis methods revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 along with the Bat-SARS-like coronavirus cluster together into a discrete lineage and the subgenus, Sarbecovirus [9, 10••].

The virology field has integrated the next-generation sequencing tools and has now moved from targeted sequencing of single genomes to genomic epidemiology [11]. These advancements have enabled the parallel sequencing of thousands of genomic sequences of pathogens of different species for the detection of pathogens. This approach has resulted in the availability of more than 2220 full genomes in the SARS-CoV-2 public database of the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) [12]. Initially, GISAID was dedicated to sharing of genomic data on influenza. However, GISAID has now extended its scope and has included the constantly updating SARS-CoV-2 database [13].

The SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences available till date mainly fall into three clades. The S clade has 541 genomes, G clade has 931 genomes, and V clade has 208 genomes. Other 548 SARS-CoV-2 genomes fall in other additional clades. Till March 28, 2020, the GISAID repository on receptor binding surveillance has identified four different rare variants in the close proximity of the binding interface. The genomic variant V483A was identified in 16 samples from USA/WA, L455I and F456V in one sample from Brazilian sample, and the genomic variant G476S in 10 samples from USA/WA samples [12]. The GISAID has also provided potential drug targets by analyzing the degree of sequence similarity of highly conserved genomic sequences between hCoV-19 and SARS virus. The main SARS protease shares 96% sequence identity and the polymerase shows 97% sequence identity with the protease and polymerase of hCoV-19, respectively. The inhibitors developed against SARS-CoV protease and polymerase also bind to the protease and polymerase of hCoV-19 in a similar way [12].

The evolution in the field of genomics has a prominent impact on the approaches employed in the epidemiology and public health [14,15,16]. Genomic epidemiology has helped reconstruct the evolutionary lineage of the viruses including the appearance of the viruses and their global spread. This integrated approach has assisted in the exploration of the evolutionary history and the structure and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Since the SARS-CoV-2 genome is mutating constantly, it is important to establish these emerging genomic variants that would help in understanding the source of transmission and would also help in accessing the community transmission. Genomic comparisons of the viral genomes help in tracing the most probable ancestor and from it has originally originated (the geographic location).

With the emerging numbers of new genomic sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from different sources of different geographical locations, a better understanding of the genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 would be established soon. Genomic epidemiology has the potential to recognize the cluster of transmission, the biological rate of transmission, and to predict the extent of spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Different countries all over the world have started projects to identify new genomic sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to have a tight watch on the progress of the pandemic in terms of understanding the genetic diversity of the novel virus, the epidemiological patterns, developing suitable diagnostic protocols and methods, and ultimately designing of vaccines and the development of therapeutics for COVID-19. Many countries from the developed nations such as Europe and North America have reported genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from their regions. However, several countries in Asia, Middle East, Africa, and Latin America lack such infrastructure and projects. In this case, a number of publically available open-access platforms such as GISAID and associated sources (https://nextstrain.org/ncov) have proven to be useful and easily accessible tools to understand the COVID-19 pandemic by using the available genomic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus [12].

Advancements in the Molecular Diagnostics for COVID-19

Since the day of the availability of the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the GISAID, several companies and research organizations developed several diagnostic molecular diagnostic methods to detect the SARS-CoV-2 in the clinical samples. The access to the genome sequence data of SARS-CoV-2 virus has enabled to design primers and probes to target the viral genome and to develop SARS-CoV-2 specific tests [17].

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

RT-PCR is considered to be the gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the clinical samples. It relies on the amplification of the viral RNA which is first concerted to CDNA and then specific primers directed against the viral genome identify the presence of the virus in the clinical samples. Samples collected from the upper respiratory tract are currently used for RT-PCR-based testing. Reports are available that highlight the use of serum, stool, and ocular secretions as the source of viral RNA [18,19,20]. Most recently self-collected saliva samples have been used for RT-PCR tests. This method reduces the pain, risk of infection of the health care providers, and a fast process [21, 22].

In RT-PCR, the primers target specific sequences on the viral CDNA and amplify the viral genome. Then, the RT-PCR is monitored in real time by the use of fluorescent dye or a sequence-specific DNA probe labeled with a fluorescent molecule [23].

Different RT-PCR kits target different genomic sequences of the virus such as ORF1b or ORF8 regions, nucleocapsid (N), spike (S) protein, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), or envelope (E) genes [24•, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].

RT-PCR-based methods are rapidly evolving. GenMark Diagnostics has recently developed a RT-PCR-based kit to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples. The ePlex SARS-CoV-2 test employs test cartridges that contain reagents for magnetic field-based extraction of viral RNA. The cartridge also has reagents for cDNA amplification and detection of viral genome in the sample by the use of ferrocene-labeled signal probes. The target is detected using voltammetry [33].

Although RT-PCR is considered as the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection, it is associated with a few disadvantages. Concerns such as requirement of expensive instruments, highly trained persons, and the time taken to generate the results have instigated the companies and the researchers to further improve RT-PCR-based tests as well as to develop new technologies to detect SARS-CoV-2.

Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification

Unlike RT-PCR which requires ramping/changes in temperatures to carry out different steps and requires multiple temperature changes for each cycle, isothermal nucleic acid amplification method amplifies viral genomic targets at a constant temperature. Several methods have been developed based on this technique.

Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) employs four different primers specific for the target sequence of the genome and works in combination with reverse transcription step. Detection is based on photometry principles that measure the turbidity that results due to the precipitation of magnesium pyrophosphate as a by-product of amplification. This method allows for real-time monitoring of the results by either quantifying the turbidity or by fluorescence using fluorescent dyes. Since RT-LAMP technique needs only heating and visual monitoring, it is a very simple method and highly sensitive that makes it a potential method for SARS-CoV-2 detection [34,35,36,37].

Transcription-Mediated Amplification

Transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) is based on the principle of retroviral replication that is used to amplify viral RNA or DNA targets. Unlike RT-PCR, TMA needs only a single temperature and is more efficient than RT-PCR [38]. TMA employs a retroviral reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA polymerase for the detection of several pathogens. Hologic’s Panther Fusion platform has been developed using the principles of both RT-PCR and TMA [39]. This is highly sensitive and has very less detection time. It does up to 1000 tests in 24 h and has the capacity to detect other pathogens whose symptoms overlap with COVID-19 in the same patient sample.

Recombinase Polymerase Amplification

Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) relies on a highly sensitive recombinase enzyme that recognizes specific DNA sequences and then displaces the strands and performs amplification of virus-specific genes. RPA performs at a single temperature and does not need expensive equipments [40]. This method has high potential of testing SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples.

CRISPR-Based Assays

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) are a family of nucleic acid sequences present in prokaryotic organisms like bacteria. Special CRISPR enzymes such as Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13 can recognize and cut these sequences. The Cas12 and Cas13 family of CRISPR enzymes can be engineered to detect and cleave the viral RNA sequences [41].

There are two companies (Mammoth Biosciences and Sherlock Biosciences) that are investigating the possibility of using this technique in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 virus in clinical samples. The SHERLOCK method utilizes Cas13 that cuts the reporter RNA sequence upon activated by SARS-CoV-2-specific guide RNA [42]. The DETECTR assay of the Mammoth Biosciences utilizes Cas12a that cleaves the reporter RNA and detects RNA sequences of the E and N genes of SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is followed by the isothermal amplification of the target sequences that are monitored visually by the use of a fluorophore [43]. These methods are sensitive and specific as well as do not need expensive instruments and can be developed on a paper strip. These tests take very less time to generate results as compared with the RT-PCR-based tests (less than 1 h) [43].

Microarray: Hybridization-Based Assays

Microarray assays are hybridization-based high throughput methods and have been recently used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids in clinical samples. The first step is to generate cDNA from viral RNA. This is followed by the labeling of the cDNA with specific probes designed to detect virus-specific cDNAs in the sample. Then, these labeled cDNAs are hybridized to complementary oligonucleotide sequences on a chip. Then, the signals of the hybridized cDNAs are quantified by a detector after washing the unhybridized cDNAs, and hence, the presence of viral nucleic acid is detected [44]. Recently, the microarray-based methods have been useful in detecting mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 genome. It has detected 24 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) gene with maximum accuracy [45].

The microarray-based techniques are useful in detecting different strains of SARS-CoV-2 rapidly on a single platform. However, the biggest drawback of this technique is the associated cost. Recently, a low cost and with equal sensitivity to RT-PCR have been developed to detect SARS-CoV-2 [45].

Amplicon-Based Metagenomic Sequencing

This technique is especially important in genomic epidemiological studies as it simultaneously identifies the SARS-CoV-2 and the background microbiome that result in secondary infections. This technique is very useful in contact tracing and epidemiological studies related to the evolution of the virus. This is of utmost importance in identifying the mutations acquired by SARS-CoV-2 and in the study of the recombination events that is carried out by the virus with the background microbiome. This amplicon and metagenomics-based technique has been used to rapidly sequence the SARS-Co-V-2 genome in mere 8 h using nasopharyngeal samples from COVID-19 [46]. The Illumina company has developed advanced form of this technique where along with detecting various strains of CoVs, it identifies various other pathogens in the clinical sample [47].

Conclusion

Epidemiological studies have now integrated molecular genetics techniques to widen its scope. With the advancements in the molecular genetics and genomics discipline, sequencing at single cell level to multiple genomes has become possible. It has become possible to compare thousands of genomes at one go with the use of advanced bioinformatics tools. Integrating these molecule aspects with the epidemiological studies has given rise to the molecular or genomic epidemiological branch of science. The molecular epidemiological studies have proven effective in understanding the molecular basis of COVID-19 along with several other communicable diseases. Rapid sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome has open avenues for the development of anti-virals and vaccines for COVID-19. The knowledge of the whole genomic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to the development of several molecular diagnostics that target the genomic sequence of the virus for its detection such as RT-PCR, isothermal amplification assays, hybridization microarray assays, amplicon-based metagenomics sequencing, and the cutting-edge CRISPR-related technologies60. Most of the molecular diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are based on RT-PCR. However, several ramifications to this gold standard technique are under process and a few have been developed and being used for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Till date, there are almost 112 molecular diagnostic tests available to detect SARS-COV-2, and of them, 90% of the tests are based on RT-PCR principles, followed by 6% tests that use isothermal amplification principles, 2% tests are based on hybridization technologies, and the rest 2% tests rely on CRISPR-based principles.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampo E, Villamizar-Peña R, Holguin-Rivera Y, Escalera-Antezanaet JP, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;34:101623.

  2. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Balbin-Ramon GJ, Rabaan AA, Ranjit Sah R, Paniz-Mondolfi A, et al. History is repeating itself, a probable zoonotic spillover as a cause of an epidemic: the case of 2019 novel coronavirus. Infez Med. 2020;28(1):3–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bracken MB. Genomic epidemiology of complex disease: the need for an electronic evidence-based approach to research synthesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(4):297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Porta M. Molecular epidemiology. In: Porta M, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang P, Croxen MA, Hasan MR, Hsiao WW, Hoang LM. Infection control in the new age of genomic epidemiology. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(2):170–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Omari A, Rabaan AA, Salih S, Al-Tawfiq JA, Memish ZA. MERS coronavirus outbreak: implications for emerging viral infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;93(3):265–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabaan AA. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: five years later. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2017;11(11):901–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rizzardini G, Saporito T, Visconti A. What is new in infectious diseases: Nipah virus, MERS-CoV and the Blueprint List of the World Health Organization. Infez Med. 2018;26(3):195–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Paraskevis D, Kostaki EG, Magiorkinis G, Panayiotakopoulos G, Sourvinos G, Tsiodras S. Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019- nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;79:104–212 Paraskevis et al. described the genomic organisation of SARS-CoV-2 and its relation with other coronaviruses such as bat coronavirus. This study suggests that the new corona virus is not a mosaic and it is most closely related with the BatCoV RaTG13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaiarsa S, De Marco L, Comandatore F, Marone P, Bandi C, Sassera D. Bacterial genomic epidemiology, from local outbreak characterization to species-history reconstruction. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109(7):319–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. GISAID. Genomic epidemiology of novel coronavirus. 2020 Available at https://nextstrain.org/ncov Last accessed 30th May 2020.

  13. Shu Y, McCauley J. GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data - from vision to reality. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(13):30494.

  14. Traynor BJ. The era of genomic epidemiology. Neuroepidemiol. 2009;33(3):276–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bastola A, Sah R, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Lal BK, Jha R, Ojha HC, et al. The first 2019 novel coronavirus case in Nepal. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):279–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sah R, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Jha R, Chu DKW, Gu H, Peiris M, et al. Complete genome sequence of a 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) strain isolated in Nepal. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020;9(11):e00169–20.

  17. Tan R. COVID-19 diagnostics explained. Asian Scientist; 2020. www.asianscientist.com/2020/04/features/covid-19-diagnostics-explained/. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  18. Xia J, Tong J, Liu M, Shen Y, Guo D. Evaluation of coronavirus in tears and conjunctival secretions of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Med Virol. 2020;92:589–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang J, Wang S, Xue Y. Fecal specimen diagnosis 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. J Med Virol. 2020;92:680–2.

  20. Kujawski SA, Wong KK, Collins JP, Epstein L, Killerby ME, Midgley CM, et al. Clinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States. Nat Med. 2020;26:861–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0877-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rutgers University; New Rutgers Saliva Test for Coronavirus Gets FDA Approval: Emergency Use Authorization Granted for New Biomaterial Collection Approach. Rutgers Today, April 2020. www.rutgers.edu/news/new-rutgers-saliva-test-coronavirus-gets-fdaapproval. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  22. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Accelerated emergency use authorization (EUA) summary SARS-CoV-2 ASSAY: Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory; 2020. p. 1–8.

  23. VanGuilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. BioTechniques. 2008;44(5):619–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Coronavirus Test Tracker: Commercially Available COVID-19 Diagnostic Tests. 360Dx, April 21, 2020. https://www.360dx.com/coronavirus-test-tracker-launched-covid-19-tests. This website provides recent updated information on the developments in the field of COVID-19 diagnostics.

  25. COVID-19 test kits included on the ARTG for legal supply in Australia. Australian Government, Department of Health, Therapeutic Goods Administration, Newsroom, April 21, 2020. www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-test-kits-included-artg-legal-supply-australia. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  26. Emergency Use Authorization: Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) information, and list of all current EUAs. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-useauthorization#LDTs. Accessed 29 May 2020.

  27. Find Evaluation Update: SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Diagnostics, COVID-10 Diagnostics Resource Centre; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND). www.finddx.org/covid-19/sarscov2-evalmolecular/. Accessed 29 May 2020.

  28. LabCorp launches test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Laboratory Corporation of America, News release. March 5, 2020. ir.labcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/labcorplaunches-test-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19. Accessed 6 June 2020.

  29. Hinton DM [US Food and Drug Administration]. Emergency use authorization of the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR diagnostic panel [Letter]. https://www.fda.gov/media/134919/download. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  30. TaqPath COVID-19 Multiplex Diagnostic Solution. Thermo- Fisher Scientific. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/clinical/clinical-genomics/pathogen-detection-solutions/coronavirus-2019-ncov/genetic-analysis/taqpath-rt-pcr-covid-19-kit.html. Accessed 30 May 2020.

  31. AllplexTM 2019-nCoV Assay. Seegene. https://www.seegene.com/assays/allplex_2019_ncov_assay. Accessed 30 May 2020.

  32. cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test (for the COVID-19 Coronavirus). Roche Diagnostics. http://diagnostics.diagnostics.roche.com/us/en/products/params/cobas-sars-cov-2-test.html. Accessed 30 May 2020.

  33. GenMark Responds to the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak. GenMark Diagnostics Inc. www.genmarkdx.com/solutions/panels/eplexpanels/eplex-sars-cov-2-test/. Accessed 30 May 2020.

  34. Thai HTC, Le MQ, Vuong CD, Parida M, Minekawa H, Notomi T, et al. Development and evaluation of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(5):1956–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. An Update on Abbott’s Work on COVID-19 Testing. Abbott Laboratories. April 15, 2020. www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/product-and-innovation/an-update-on-abbotts-work-on-COVID-19-testing.html. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  36. ID NOW COVID-19, Abbott Laboratories. www.alere.com/en/home/product-details/id-now-covid-19.html. Accessed 10 June 2020.

  37. Zhang Y, Odiwuor N, Xiong J, Sun L, Nayaruaba RO, Wei H, et al. Rapid molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus RNA using colorimetric LAMP. medRxiv 2020, 2020.02.26.20028373. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.26.20028373.

  38. Kacian DL, Fultz TJ. Kits for nucleic acid sequence amplification methods. U.S. Patent 4888779, 1999. patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5888779.PN.&OS=PN/5888779&RS=PN/5888779.

  39. Hologic’s molecular test for the novel coronavirus, SARSCoV-2, receives FDA emergency use authorization. Coronavirus Update, 2020. Hologic, Inc. hologic.com/coronavirus-test. (https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/resources/COVID-19/molecular-based-tests/).

  40. Abd El Wahed A, Patel P, Heidenreich D, Hufert FT, Weidmann M. Reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the detection of middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. PLoS Curr. 2013;5. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.62df1c7c75ffc96cd59034531e2e8364.

  41. What is CRISPR? Ask the Brain, January 1, 2019. The McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. mcgovern.mit.eduhttp://mcgovern.mit.edu/2019/01/01/crispr-in-a-nutshell/.

  42. Zhang F, Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS. A protocol for detection of COVID-19 using CRISPR diagnostics (v.20200321). https://www.broadinstitute.org/files/publications/special/COVID-19%20detection%20(updated).pdf. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  43. Pryor J. 3 Questions: How COVID-19 tests work and why they’re in short supply. MIT News: On Campus and around the World, April 10, 2020. https://news.mit.edu/2020/how-covid-19-tests-work-why-they-are-in-short-supply-0410. Accessed 25 June 2020.

  44. Guo X, Geng P, Wang Q, Cao B, Liu B. Development of a single nucleotide polymorphism DNA microarray for the detection and genotyping of the SARS coronavirus. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;24(10):1445–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. de Souza Luna LK, Heiser V, Regamey N, Panning M, Drexler JF, Mulangu S, et al. Generic detection of coronaviruses and differentiation at the prototype strain level by reverse-transcription-PCR and nonfluorescent low-density microarray. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(3):1049–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Moore SC, Penrice-Randal R, Alruwaili M, Dong X, Pullan ST, Carter DP, et al. Amplicon based MinION sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 and metagenomics characterisation of nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with COVID-19. medRxiv 2020, 2020.03.05.20032011. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.20032011.

  47. Comprehensive Workflow for Detecting Coronavirus Using Illumina Benchtop Systems − A Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing Workflow for Effective Detection and Characterization of Coronavirus Strains. Infectious Disease Surveillance, 2020. http://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    Ali A. Rabaan

  2. Specialty Paediatric Medicine, Qatif Central Hospital, Qatif, Saudi Arabia

    Shamsah H. Al-Ahmed

  3. Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Ranjit Sah

  4. Specialty Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq

  5. Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq

  6. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq

  7. Research and Scientific Studies Unit, College of Nursing & Allied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

    Shafiul Haque

  8. Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

    Harapan Harapan

  9. Tropical Disease Centre, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia

    Harapan Harapan

  10. Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia

    Harapan Harapan

  11. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán, Huánuco, Peru

    Kovy Arteaga-Livias

  12. Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru

    Kovy Arteaga-Livias & Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales

  13. Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia

    D. Katterine Bonilla Aldana & Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales

  14. Semillero de Investigación en Zoonosis (SIZOO), Grupo de Investigación BIOECOS, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia

    D. Katterine Bonilla Aldana & Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales

  15. College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India

    Pawan Kumar

  16. Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India

    Kuldeep Dhama

  17. Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Sede Pereira, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia

    Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales

Authors
  1. Ali A. Rabaan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shamsah H. Al-Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ranjit Sah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shafiul Haque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Harapan Harapan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kovy Arteaga-Livias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. D. Katterine Bonilla Aldana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pawan Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kuldeep Dhama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ali A. Rabaan or Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on COVID-19 in the Tropics: Impact and Solutions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabaan, A.A., Al-Ahmed, S.H., Sah, R. et al. Genomic Epidemiology and Recent Update on Nucleic Acid–Based Diagnostics for COVID-19. Curr Trop Med Rep 7, 113–119 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-020-00212-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-020-00212-3

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Molecular epidemiology
  • Diagnostics
  • RT-PCR