Abstract
Purpose of Review
Angelman syndrome is often associated with severe communication impairment indicating the need for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention. The present review sought to identify and summarize intervention studies on the use of augmentative and alternative communication for people with Angelman syndrome.
Recent Findings
Recently, a specific communicative profile has been suggested for people with Angelman syndrome. To identify the usefulness of AAC to augment this profile, we conducted a systematic search of the literature. Nine studies were identified and summarized with respect to (a) participants, (b) communication mode, (c) design, (d) intervention procedures, (e) outcome measures, and main findings.
Summary
Overall, results from these studies suggest that AAC intervention is a viable approach for enhancing the communication skills of people with Angelman syndrome. However, additional research with larger samples is required to extend the evidence base supporting the use of AAC with people with Angelman syndrome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Bailus BJ, Segal DJ. The prospect of molecular therapy for Angelman syndrome and other monogenic neurologic disorders. BMC Neurosci. 2014;15:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-76.
Mertz LGB, Christensen R, Vogel I, Hertz JM, Nielsen KB, Grønskov K, et al. Angelman syndrome in Denmark. Birth incidence, genetic findings, and age at diagnosis. Am J Med Genet. 2013;161:2197–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36058.
• Clayton-Smith J, Laan L. Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects. J Med Genet. 2003;40:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.40.2.87Overview of the features of Angelman syndrome including a thorough description of the genetic mechanisms and the clinical manifestation.
•• Knoll JH, Nicholls RD, Lalande M. On the parental origin of the deletion in Angelman syndrome. Hum Genet. 1989;83:205–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286723Seminal work on the genetic cause of Angelman syndrome and the identification of the genetic mechanisms involved in Angelman syndrome.
Williams CA, Driscoll DJ, Dagli AI. Clinical and genetic aspects of Angelman syndrome. Genet Med. 2010;12:385–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181def138.
Lossie AC, Whitney MM, Amidon D, Dong HJ, Chen P, Theriaque D, et al. Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet. 2001;38:834–45. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.38.12.834.
Mabb AM, Judson MC, Zylka MJ, Philpot BD. Angelman syndrome: insights into genomic imprinting and neurodevelopmental phentotypes. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.04.001.
• Didden R, Sigafoos J, Korzilius H, Baas A, Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, et al. Form and function of communicative behaviours in individuals with Angelman syndrome. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2009;22:526–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00520.xCritical work identifying and describing the pre-linguistic communication behaviours seen in people with Angelman syndrome.
Horsler K, Oliver C. The behavioural phenotype of Angelman syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00730.x.
• Calculator SN. Parents’ reports of patterns of use and exposure to practices associated with AAC acceptance by individuals with Angelman syndrome. Augmentative Altern Commun. 2013;29:146–58. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.784804Critical work directly assessing parents perceptions of AAC use in individuals with Angelman syndrome.
•• Pearson E, Wilde L, Heald M, Royston R, Oliver C. Communication in Angelman syndrome: a scoping review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019:1266–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14257Recent scoping review of studies focused on the communication profile of people with Angelman syndrome.
•• Quinn ED, Rowland C. Exploring expressive communication skills in a cross-sectional sample of children and young adults with Angelman syndrome. Ame J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26:369–82. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0075 Critical recent research focused on the expressive communication profile of young people with Angelman syndrome.
•• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs: Paul H. Brookes Pub.; 2013. Comprehensive resource for designing and implementing AAC interventions for people with complex communication needs.
•• Jolleff N, Emmerson F, Ryan M, McConachie H. Communication skills in Angelman syndrome: matching phenotype to genotype. Adv Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;8:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040500459684Pivotal work linking the characteristics of Angelman syndrome to the genetic profile.
• Radstaake M, Didden R, Oliver C, Allen D, & Curfs LM. Functional analysi and functional communication training in individuals with Angelman syndrome. Dev Neurorehabil, 2012:15:91–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2011.651537.
• Radstaake M, Didden R, Lang R, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Lancioni GE, et al. Functional analysis and functional communication training in the classroom for three children with Angelman syndrome. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013;25:49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9302-4.
• Martin JH, Reichle J, Dimian A, Chen M. Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2013;44:327–36. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161.1461(2013/12-0108).
• van der Meer L, Didden R, Sutherland D, O’Reilly MF, Lancioni GE, Sigafoos J. Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2012;24:451–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9283-3.
• Calculator SN. Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman syndrome and their parents. Ame J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;11:340–55. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/039).
• Calculator SN. Description and evaluation of a home-based, parent-administered program for teaching enhanced natural gestures to individuals with Angelman syndrome. Ame J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0017.
• Calculator S, Diaz-Caneja Sela P. Overview of the enhanced natural gestures instructional approach and illustration of its use with three students with Angelman syndrome. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015;28:145–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12110.
• Summers J, Szatmari P. Using discrete trial instruction to teach children with Angelman syndrome. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil. 2009;24:216–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357609334057.
• Summers J. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with Angelman syndrome after 1 year of behavioral intervention. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15:239–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.676101.
Bondy A, Frost L. The picture exchange communication system. Focus Autistic Behav. 1994:91–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576940090301.
Reichle J, York J, Sigafoos J. Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 1991.
Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968;4:443–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530764.
Mullen E. Mullen scales of early learning. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1995.
Bzoch K, League R. Receptive-expressive emergent language scale. 2nd ed. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1991.
Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roche, L., Sigafoos, J. & Trembath, D. Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention for People With Angelman Syndrome: a Systematic Review. Curr Dev Disord Rep 7, 28–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-020-00187-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-020-00187-w