What Can Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Tell Us About Brain Oscillations?
- 350 Downloads
Purpose of the Review
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) allows to interfere with oscillatory brain activity. Here, we provide an overview of novel approaches for removing the tACS artefact to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for on-line tACS effects. Furthermore, we review recent findings on tACS after-effects and clinical applications.
tACS-induced entrainment of alpha oscillations was demonstrated in on-line electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. On-line effects have also been revealed by innovative tACS protocols utilizing amplitude modulation, cross-frequency coupling, non-sinusoidal waveforms, and non-electrical physiological measures. tACS after-effects on alpha power exceeding 1-h duration have been reported, and a behavioral relevance of these physiological changes was shown for the first time.
Our understanding of tACS on-line effects greatly benefited from new artefact removal approaches. After-effects of varying duration have been consistently reported but the underlying mechanism is still unclear. tACS as a neurotherapeutic is only emerging, but first evidence for successful tACS interventions in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders is encouraging.
KeywordsElectroencephalogram Brain oscillations Transcranial electric stimulation Transcranial alternating current stimulation tACS artefact
This work was supported by a grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG, SPP1665 HE3353/8-1) awarded to Dr. Herrmann.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Herrmann has received honoraria as editor from Elsevier Publishers and has filed a patent application for transcranial electric stimulation.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).
Papers of Particular Interest, Published Recently, Have Been Highlighted as: • Of Importance •• Of Major Importance
- 2.Veniero D, Strüber D, Thut G, Herrmann CS. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques can modulate cognitive processing. Organ Res Methods. 2016:1–32.Google Scholar
- 10.Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Strüber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(279).Google Scholar
- 12.Antonenko D, Faxel M, Grittner U, Lavidor M, Flöel A. Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on cognitive functions in healthy young and older adults. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:no pagination.Google Scholar
- 17.Neuling T, Wagner S, Wolters CH, Zaehle T, Herrmann CS. Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3(83).Google Scholar
- 18.Antal A, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current and random noise stimulation: Possible mechanisms. Neural Plasticity. 2016.Google Scholar
- 19.•• Opitz A, Falchier A, Yan C, Yeagle E, Linn G. Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in human and nonhuman primates. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31236. This study recorded human electrophysiology intra-cranially during tACS. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.•• Huang Y, Liu AA, Lafon B, Friedman D, Dayan M, Wang X, et al. Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation. Elife. 2017;10.7554/eL. This study recorded human electrophysiology intra-cranially during tACS.
- 22.Notbohm A, Kurths J, Herrmann CS. Modification of brain oscillations via rhythmic light stimulation provides evidence for entrainment but not for superposition of event-related responses. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10(10).Google Scholar
- 23.• Helfrich RF, Schneider TR, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld S. A., Engel AK, Herrmann CS. Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2014;24(3):333–9. This study demonstrated tACS-induced entrainment of brain oscillations in human EEG after removal of the tACS-artefact. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.• Alekseichuk I, Turi Z, Amador de Lara G, Antal A, Paulus W. Spatial working memory in humans depends on theta and high gamma snchronization in the prefrontal cortex. Curr Biol. 2016;26(12):1513–21. This study used a cross-frequency stimulation signal for tACS compsed of gamma oscillations occurring during different phases of a theta oscillation. Google Scholar
- 34.Negahbani E, Kasten FH, Herrmann CS, Fröhlich F. Targeting alpha oscillations with amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS). In: Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience, 2016. Online.; 2016. p. Poster No. 506.10.Google Scholar
- 35.Alagapan S, Schmidt SL, Lefebvre J, Hadar E, Shin HW, Fröhlich F. Modulation of cortical oscillations by low-frequency direct cortical stimulation is state-dependent. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(3):1–21.Google Scholar
- 36.Dowsett J, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation with sawtooth waves: Simultaneous stimulation and EEG recording. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10.Google Scholar
- 44.Veniero D, Vossen A, Gross J, Thut G. Lasting EEG/MEG aftereffects of rhythmic transcranial brain stimulation: Level of control over oscillatory network activity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9(477).Google Scholar
- 45.Strüber D, Rach S, Neuling T, Herrmann CS. On the possible role of stimulation duration for after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9(311).Google Scholar
- 46.Neuling T, Rach S, Herrmann CS. Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(161).Google Scholar
- 47.Kasten FH, Dowsett J, Herrmann CS. Sustained aftereffect of α-tACS lasts up to 70 minutes after stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10(245).Google Scholar
- 48.• Kasten FH, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) enhances mental rotation performance during and after stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11(2):1–16. This study demonstrated the behavioural relevance of the physiological after-effect of tACS. Google Scholar
- 64.Prehn-Kristensen A, Munz M, Göder R, Wilhelm I, Korr K, Vahl W, et al. Transcranial oscillatory direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory consolidation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to a level comparable to healthy controls. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(6):793–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.• Munz MT, Prehn-Kristensen A, Thielking F, Molle M, Goder R, Baving L. Slow oscillating transcranial direct current stimulation during non-rapid eye movement sleep improves behavioral inhibition in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:307. This study demonstrates behavioural effects of tACS in boys with ADHD. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 69.Hess CW. Modulation of cortical-subcortical networks in Parkinson’s disease by applied field effects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(565).Google Scholar
- 70.Krause V, Wach C, Südmeyer M, Ferrea S, Schnitzler A, Pollok B. Cortico-muscular coupling and motor performance are modulated by 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in Parkinson’s disease. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;7(928).Google Scholar
- 73.•• Brittain JS, Probert-Smith P, Aziz TZ, Brown P. Tremor suppression by rhythmic transcranial current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2013;23(5):436–40. This study applied a closed-loop design in patients, stimulating tACS depending on the phase of PD patients’ tremor. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar