Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality control in multistage machining processes based on a machining error propagation event-knowledge graph

  • Published:
Advances in Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In multistage machining processes (MMPs), a clear understanding of the error accumulation, propagation, and evolution mechanisms between different processes is crucial for improving the quality of machining products and achieving effective product quality control. This paper proposes the construction of a machining error propagation event-knowledge graph (MEPEKG) for quality control in MMPs, inspired by the application of knowledge graphs to data, information, and knowledge organization and utilization. Initially, a cyber-physical system (CPS)-based production process data acquisition sensor network is constructed, and process flow-oriented process monitoring is achieved through the radio frequency identification (RFID) production event model. Secondly, the process-related quality feature and working condition data are preprocessed; features are extracted from the distributed CPS nodes; and the production event model is used to achieve the dynamic mapping and updating of feature data under the guidance of the MEPEKG schema layer. Moreover, the mathematical model of machining error propagation based on the second-order Taylor expansion is used to quantitatively analyze the quality control in MMPs based on the support of MEPEKG data. Finally, the efficacy and reliability of the MEPEKG for error propagation analysis and quality control of MMPs were verified using a case study of a specially shaped rotary component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shang C, You F (2019) Data analytics and machine learning for smart process manufacturing: recent advances and perspectives in the big data era. Engineering 5:1010–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ji S, Pan S, Cambria E et al (2022) A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 33:494–514

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. He L, Jiang P (2019) Manufacturing knowledge graph: a connectivism to answer production problems query with knowledge reuse. IEEE Access 7:101231–101244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsai JM, Sun IC, Chen KS (2021) Realization and performance evaluation of a machine tool vibration monitoring module by multiple MEMS accelerometer integrations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh AK, Ullah AS, Teti R et al (2021) Developing sensor signal-based digital twins for intelligent machine tools. J Ind Inf Integr 24:100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JII.2021.100242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee WJ, Mendis GP, Triebe MJ et al (2020) Monitoring of a machining process using kernel principal component analysis and kernel density estimation. J Intell Manuf 31:1175–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Serin G, Sener B, Ozbayoglu AM et al (2020) Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:953–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J, Zhou H, Liu X et al (2019) Dynamic evaluation method of machining process planning based on digital twin. IEEE Access 7:19312–19323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teti R, Mourtzis D, D’Addona DM et al (2022) Process monitoring of machining. CIRP Ann 71:529–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bi Z, Liu Y, Krider J et al (2018) Real-time force monitoring of smart grippers for internet of things (IoT) applications. J Ind Inf Integr 11:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dafflon B, Moalla N, Ouzrout Y (2021) The challenges, approaches, and used techniques of CPS for manufacturing in Industry 4.0: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:2395–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding K, Jiang P (2018) RFID-based production data analysis in an IoT-enabled smart job-shop. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin 5:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou G, Zhang C, Li Z et al (2019) Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing. Intl J Prod Res 58:1034–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leng J, Zhang H, Yan D et al (2019) Digital twin-driven manufacturing cyber-physical system for parallel controlling of smart workshop. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:1155–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang H, Kumara S, Bukkapatnam STS et al (2019) The Internet of Things for smart manufacturing: a review. IISE Trans 51:1190–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou L, Jiang Z, Geng N et al (2021) Production and operations management for intelligent manufacturing: a systematic literature review. Intl J Prod Res 60:808–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang C, Jiang P, Lu T (2018) Production events graphical deduction model enabled real-time production control system for smart job shop. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 232:2803–2820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang C, Jiang P (2018) Manifold learning based rescheduling decision mechanism for recessive disturbances in RFID-driven job shops. J Intell Manuf 29:1485–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shojaeinasab A, Charter T, Jalayer M et al (2022) Intelligent manufacturing execution systems: a systematic review. J Manuf Syst 62:503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rezaei-Malek M, Mohammadi M, Dantan JY et al (2018) A review on optimisation of part quality inspection planning in a multi-stage manufacturing system. Intl J Prod Res 57:4880–4897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi J, Zhou S (2009) Quality control and improvement for multistage systems: a survey. IIE Trans 41:744–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu SJ (1997) Stream-of-variation theory for automotive body assembly. CIRP Ann 46:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. da Mata AS (2020) Complex networks: a mini-review. Braz J Phys 50:658–672

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y, Jiang P, Leng J (2016) An extended machining error propagation network model for small-batch machining process control of aircraft landing gear parts. J Aero Eng 231:1347–1365

    Google Scholar 

  25. Du S, Xu R, Li L (2018) Modeling and analysis of multiproduct multistage manufacturing system for quality improvement. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 48:801–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang K, Yin Y, Du S et al (2021) Variation management of key control characteristics in multistage machining processes considering quality-cost equilibrium. J Manuf Syst 59:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang K, Li G, Du S et al (2021) State space modelling of variation propagation in multistage machining processes for variable stiffness structure workpieces. Int J Prod Res 59:4033–4052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li P, Jiang P, Guo W (2021) Modeling of machining errors’ accumulation driven by RFID graphical deduction computing in multistage machining processes. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 17:3971–3981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peres RS, Barata J, Leitao P et al (2019) Multistage quality control using machine learning in the automotive industry. IEEE Access 7:79908–79916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Proteau A, Tahan A, Zemouri R et al (2023) Predicting the quality of a machined workpiece with a variational autoencoder approach. J Intell Manuf 34:719–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dai HN, Wang H, Xu G et al (2019) Big data analytics for manufacturing internet of things: opportunities, challenges and enabling technologies. Ent Info Syst 14:1279–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bader SR, Grangel-Gonzalez I, Nanjappa P et al (2020) A knowledge graph for Industry 4.0. In: Harth A, Kirrane S, Ngomo ACN et al (eds) Proceedings of the 17th international conference, ESWC 2020, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 31–June 4, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_27

  33. Abu-Salih B (2021) Domain-specific knowledge graphs: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 185:103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNCA.2021.103076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hedberg TD, Bajaj M, Camelio JA (2020) Using graphs to link data across the product lifecycle for enabling smart manufacturing digital threads. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 20(1):011011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Armand H, Frédéric S, Romain P et al (2021) Context-aware cognitive design assistant: implementation and study of design rules recommendations. Adv Eng Inform 50:101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2021.101419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou B, Bao J, Li J et al (2021) A novel knowledge graph-based optimization approach for resource allocation in discrete manufacturing workshops. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 71:102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RCIM.2021.102160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou B, Hua B, Gu X et al (2021) An end-to-end tabular information-oriented causality event evolutionary knowledge graph for manufacturing documents. Adv Eng Inform 50:101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2021.101441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu H, Ma R, Li D et al (2021) Machinery fault diagnosis based on deep learning for time series analysis and knowledge graphs. J Signal Process Syst 93:1433–1455

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu M, Li X, Li J et al (2022) A knowledge graph-based data representation approach for IIoT-enabled cognitive manufacturing. Adv Eng Inform 51:101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2021.101515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lyu M, Li X, Chen CH (2022) Achieving knowledge-as-a-service in IIoT-driven smart manufacturing: a crowdsourcing-based continuous enrichment method for industrial knowledge graph. Adv Eng Inform 51:101494. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2021.101494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guan S, Cheng X, Bai L et al (2022) What is event knowledge graph: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 35(7):7569–7589. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2022.3180362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Glavaš G, Šnajder J (2014) Event graphs for information retrieval and multi-document summarization. Expert Syst Appl 41:6904–6916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rospocher M, Van Erp M, Vossen P et al (2016) Building event-centric knowledge graphs from news. J Web Semant 37(38):132–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li Z, Zhao S, Ding X et al (2017) EEG: knowledge base for event evolutionary principles and patterns. Commun Comput Inform Sci 774:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gottschalk S, Demidova E (2018) EventKG: a multilingual event-centric temporal knowledge graph. Lect Notes Comput Sci 10843:272–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ding X, Li Z, Liu T et al (2019) ELG: an event logic graph. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.08015

  47. Mao Q, Li X, Peng H et al (2021) Event prediction based on evolutionary event ontology knowledge. Futur Gener Comput Syst 115:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gottschalk S, Demidova E (2019) EventKG—the hub of event knowledge on the web—and biographical timeline generation. Semant Web 10:1039–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Souza Costa T, Gottschalk S, Demidova E (2020) Event-QA: a dataset for event-centric question answering over knowledge graphs. In: Proceedings of international conference on information and knowledge management, pp 3157–3164. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412760

  50. Wu J, Zhu X, Zhang C et al (2020) Event-centric tourism knowledge graph—a case study of Hainan. Lect Notes Comput Sci 12274:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cheng D, Yang F, Wang X et al. (2020) Knowledge graph-based event embedding framework for financial quantitative investments. In: Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Xi’an, pp 2221–2230. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401427

  52. Kuntoğlu M, Salur E, Gupta MK et al (2021) A state-of-the-art review on sensors and signal processing systems in mechanical machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116:2711–2735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ren H, Guo W, Jiang P et al (2021) An integrated approach of Active Incremental fine-tuning, SegNet, and CRF for cutting tool wearing areas segmentation with small samples. Knowl Based Syst 218:106838. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2021.106838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975464).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, People’s Republic of China

    Hao-Liang Shi & Ping-Yu Jiang

Authors
  1. Hao-Liang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ping-Yu Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-Yu Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, HL., Jiang, PY. Quality control in multistage machining processes based on a machining error propagation event-knowledge graph. Adv. Manuf. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-024-00481-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-024-00481-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation