Skip to main content
Log in

Smoothing strategy for corner of small curvature radius by abrasive waterjet machining

  • Published:
Advances in Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abrasive waterjet (AWJ) is widely applied in 2D machining as it offers high machining efficiency and low machining cost. However, machining a 3D surface, especially for a small curvature radius freeform surface (SCRFS), results in over-erosion of the corner, and has been one of the greatest issues of AWJ. To solve this problem, a local smoothing algorithm for SCRFS is developed by the junction of two linear segments at the corner by inserting cubic second-order B-spline to smooth the nozzle path and posture under the setting tolerance error, which is aimed to avoid over-erosion due to the change in dwell time. Analytical solutions of the smooth corner position and orientation of the nozzle path are obtained by evaluating a synchronization algorithm. According to the set tolerance error of the nozzle position and orientation, the interpolation of the smooth path of the corner meets the constraint conditions of the linear feed drive. Path simulation and experimental results show that the proposed method is validated by the experimental results and has been applied to the integral blisk machining of an aero-engine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazoglu I, Manav C, Murtezaoglu Y (2009) Tool path optimization for free form surface machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang JY, Yao CF, Cui MC et al (2021) Three-dimensional modeling and reconstructive change of residual stress during machining process of milling, polishing, heat treatment, vibratory finishing, and shot peening of fan blade. Adv Manuf 9:430–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Toubhans B, Fromentin G, Viprey F et al (2020) Machinability of inconel 718 during turning: cutting force model considering tool wear, influence on surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol 285:116809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lotfi M, Amini S, Al-Awady IY (2018) 3D numerical analysis of drilling process: heat, wear, and built-up edge. Adv Manuf 6:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavalda DO, Garcia LG, Liao Z et al (2019) The new challenges of machining ceramic matrix composites (CMCs): review of surface integrity. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 139:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu XF, Wang WH, Jiang RS et al (2020) Tool wear mechanisms in axial ultrasonic vibration assisted milling in-situ TiB2/7050Al metal matrix composites. Adv Manuf 8:252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar R, Sahoo AK, Mishra PC et al (2018) Comparative investigation towards machinability improvement in hard turning using coated and uncoated carbide inserts: part I experimental investigation. Adv Manuf 6:52–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalantari O, Jafarian F, Fallah MM (2021) Comparative investigation of surface integrity in laser assisted and conventional machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process 62:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hlaváč LM, Bańkowski D, Krajcarz D et al (2021) Abrasive waterjet (AWJ) forces—indicator of cutting system malfunction. Materials (Basel) 14:1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spadło S, Bańkowski D, Młynarczyk P et al (2021) Influence of local temperature changes on the material microstructure in abrasive water jet machining (AWJM). Materials (Basel) 14:5399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Torrubia PL, Billingham J, Axinte DA (2016) Stochastic simplified modelling of abrasive waterjet footprints. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 472:20150836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0836

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Folkes J (2009) Waterjet-an innovative tool for manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 209:6181–6189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J (2007) Predictive depth of jet penetration models for abrasive waterjet cutting of alumina ceramics. Int J Mech Sci 49:306–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong MC, Axinte DA (2012) Capability of advanced abrasive waterjet machining and its applications. Appl Mech Mater 110/116:1674–1682

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li M, Huang M, Chen Y et al (2019) Effects of processing parameters on kerf characteristics and surface integrity following abrasive waterjet slotting of Ti6Al4V/CFRP stacks. J Manuf Process 42:82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu YS, Wu J, Lu WZ et al (2022) Surface formation mechanics and its microstructural characteristics of AAJP of aluminum alloy by using amino thermosetting plastic abrasive. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 9:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karmiris-Obratański P, Karkalos NE, Kudelski R et al (2021) On the effect of multiple passes on kerf characteristics and efficiency of abrasive waterjet cutting. Metals (Basel) 11:74. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pahuja R, Ramulu M (2019) Study of surface topography in abrasive water jet machining of carbon foam and morphological characterization using discrete wavelet transform. J Mater Process Technol 273:116249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo C, Yang J, Wen J (2020) Wear behaviour and sustainability of coated abrasives in grinding of aluminium alloy using minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 7:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thongkaew K, Wang J, Li W (2019) An investigation of the hole machining processes on woven carbon-fiber reinforced polymers (CFRPs) using abrasive waterjets. Mach Sci Technol 23:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kovacevic R, Fang M (1994) Modeling of the influence of the abrasive waterjet cutting parameters on the depth of cut based on fuzzy rules. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Axinte D, Billingham J, Guillerna AB (2017) New models for energy beam machining enable accurate generation of free forms. Sci Adv 3:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bilbao-Guillerna A, Axinte DA, Billingham J et al (2017) Waterjet and laser etching: the nonlinear inverse problem. R Soc Open Sci 4:161031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161031

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Ranjan P, Chaubey P, Suresh P et al (2022) Current research aspects and trends in abrasive water jet machining: a review. Adv Mech Eng Technol 2022:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Natarajan Y, Murugesan PK, Mohan M et al (2020) Abrasive water jet machining process: a state of art of review. J Manuf Process 49:271–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hlaváč LM (2021) Revised model of abrasive water jet cutting for industrial use. Materials (Basel) 14:4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14144032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karmiris-Obratański P, Karkalos NE, Kudelski R et al (2020) Experimental study on the correlation of cutting head vibrations and kerf characteristics during abrasive waterjet cutting of titanium alloy. Procedia CIRP 101:226–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Axinte DA, Srinivasu DS, Billingham J et al (2010) Geometrical modelling of abrasive waterjet footprints: a study for 90° jet impact angle. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuvaraj N, Kumar MP (2017) Investigation of process parameters influence in abrasive water jet cutting of D2 steel. Mater Manuf Process 32:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Billingham J, Miron CB, Axinte DA et al (2013) Mathematical modelling of abrasive waterjet footprints for arbitrarily moving jets: part II—overlapped single and multiple straight paths. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 68:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vikram G, Ramesh BN (2002) Modelling and analysis of abrasive water jet cut surface topography. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1345–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hlaváč LM, Hlaváčová IM, Arleo F et al (2018) Shape distortion reduction method for abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting. Precis Eng 53:194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Zhao M, Ye P et al (2019) A G4 continuous B-spline transition algorithm for CNC machining with jerk-smooth feedrate scheduling along linear segments. CAD Comput Aided Des 115:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang L, Wang H, Liu Z et al (2021) A real-time quadrotor trajectory planning framework based on B-spline and nonuniform kinodynamic search. J F Robot 38:452–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by NSFC-Liaoning Joint Fund (Grant Nos. U1708256, U1908232), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. DUT18GF104), Joint Fund of MOE and GAD (Grant No. 6141A02022133).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang Gao.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g., a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, JF., Yuan, YM., Gao, H. et al. Smoothing strategy for corner of small curvature radius by abrasive waterjet machining. Adv. Manuf. 11, 390–406 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-023-00443-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-023-00443-3

Keywords

Navigation