Skip to main content
Log in

Construction of an enhanced 2-DOF finite element model for precise control of flexible beam vibration

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study deals with constructing an enhanced two-degree-of-freedom finite element-based model for a cantilever flexible beam (FB) with a dynamic solution near the actual beam under various loadings. This model is obtained by adding a complementary term to the simple discrete model, initially developed with one element for the FB, to upgrade its content toward the actual beam. The complementary term that compensates for the model mismatching is online calculated by minimizing the estimation error defined as the difference between the end-point position of the actual beam measured by the sensor and the position obtained for the enhanced model. The experimental responses of the constructed model in both time and frequency domains are in a good agreement with the actual beam within the structure of an open-loop system. Accordingly, an optimization-based controller using the proposed model is designed to reduce the beam vibration. The accuracy of the closed-loop control system is evaluated through Adams–MATLAB co-simulations. The results reveal that the proposed model-updating algorithm remarkably enhances the accuracy of the nominal model in the presence of un-modeled dynamics and parametric uncertainties. Also, comparative results indicate that the proposed control system has a superior performance in suppressing the beam vibrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Korayem MH, Dehkordi SF, Mojarradi M, Monfared P (2019) Analytical and experimental investigation of the dynamic behavior of a revolute-prismatic manipulator with N flexible links and hubs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:2235–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alandoli EA, Sulaiman M, Rashid MZ, Shah HN, Ismail Z (2016) A review study on flexible link manipulators. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng (JTEC) 8:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang JB, Jiang LJ, Chen DC (2004) Dynamic modelling and control of a rotating Euler-Bernoulli beam. J Sound Vib 274:863–875

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. He W, Liu C (2015) Vibration control of a Timoshenko beam system with input backlash. IET Control Theory Appl 9:1802–1809

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Barczyk M, Lynch AF (2008) Flatness-based estimated state feedback control for a rotating flexible beam: experimental results. IET Control Theory Appl 2:288–302

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Xing X, Liu J (2020) PDE modelling and vibration control of overhead crane bridge with unknown control directions and parametric uncertainties. IET Control Theory Appl 14:116–126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lei Y, Murmu T, Adhikari S, Friswell MI (2013) Dynamic characteristics of damped viscoelastic nonlocal Euler–Bernoulli beams. Eur J Mech-A/Solids 42:125–136

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Chen G (1991) Asymptotic locations of eigenfrequencies of Euler–Bernoulli beam with nonhomogeneous structural and viscous damping coefficients. SIAM J Control Optim 29:347–367

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu K, Liu Z (1998) Exponential decay of energy of the Euler–Bernoulli beam with locally distributed Kelvin-Voigt damping. SIAM J Control Optim 36:1086–1098

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Giorgio I, Del Vescovo D (2018) Non-linear lumped-parameter modeling of planar multi-link manipulators with highly flexible arms. Robotics 7:60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lochan K, Roy BK, Subudhi B (2017) Robust tip trajectory synchronisation between assumed modes modelled two-link flexible manipulators using second-order PID terminal SMC. Robot Auton Syst 97:108–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vidoni R, Scalera L, Gasparetto A (2018) 3-D ERLS based dynamic formulation for flexible-link robots: theoretical and numerical comparison between the finite element method and the component mode synthesis approaches. Int J Mech Control 19:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grazioso S, Sonneville V, Di Gironimo G, Bauchau O, Siciliano B (2016) A nonlinear finite element formalism for modelling flexible and soft manipulators. In: IEEE international conference on simulation, modeling, and programming for autonomous robots (SIMPAR), pp 185–190

  14. Tokhi MO, Mohamed Z, Shaheed MH (2016) Dynamic characterisation of a flexible manipulator system. Robotica 19:571–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JD, Wang BL (1988) Optimal control of a flexible robot arm. Comput Struct 29:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodzic D (2021) Bending analysis of cantilever beam in finite element method. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara 19:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fan J, Zhang D, Shen H (2020) Dynamic modeling and simulation of a rotating flexible hub-beam based on different discretization methods of deformation fields. Arch Appl Mech 90:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohamed Z, Tokhi MO (2004) Command shaping techniques for vibration control of a flexible robot manipulator. Mechatronics 14:69–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alandoli EA, Lee TS, Lin YJ, Vijayakumar V (2021) Dynamic model and intelligent optimal controller of flexible link manipulator system with payload uncertainty. Arab J Sci Eng 46:7423–7433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Green A, Sasiadek J (2003) Robot manipulator control for rigid and assumed mode flexible dynamics models. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, p 5435

  21. Roshin R, Shihabudheen KV (2020) Tip point control of a flexible beam using robust Mu synthesis controller. In: 2020 International conference on futuristic technologies in control systems and renewable energy (ICFCR). IEEE, pp 1–6

  22. Mirzaeinejad H, Mirzaei M (2010) A novel method for non-linear control of wheel slip in anti-lock braking systems. Control Eng Pract 18:918–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moradi Nerbin M, Mojed Gharamaleki R, Mirzaei M (2017) Novel optimal control of semi-active suspension considering a hysteresis model for MR damper. Trans Inst Meas Control 39:698–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghiasi AR, Alizadeh G, Mirzaei M (2010) Simultaneous design of optimal gait pattern and controller for a bipedal robot. Multibody SysDyn 23:401–429

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Aghasizade S, Mirzaei M, Safatnia S (2018) Novel constrained control of active suspension system integrated with anti-lock braking system based on 14-degree of freedom vehicle model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K: J Multi-body Dyn 232:501–520

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ross CT (1996) Finite element techniques in structural mechanics. Elsevier

  27. Logan DL (2016) A first course in the finite element method. Cengage Learning

  28. Martins JM, Mohamed Z, Tokhi MO, Da Costa JS, Botto MA (2003) Approaches for dynamic modelling of flexible manipulator systems. IEEE Proc-Control Theory Appl 150:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rafatnia S, Mirzaei M (2022) Adaptive estimation of vehicle velocity from updated dynamic model for control of anti-lock braking system. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 23:5871–5880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rafatnia S, Mirzaei M (2022) Estimation of reliable vehicle dynamic model using IMU/GNSS data fusion for stability controller design. Mech Syst Signal Process 168:108593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jamshidi S, Mirzaei M, Malekzadeh M (2023) Applied nonlinear control of spacecraft simulator with constraints on torque and momentum of reaction wheels’. ISA Trans 138:705–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jafari M, Mirzaei M, Mirzaeinejad H (2015) Optimal nonlinear control of vehicle braking torques to generate practical stabilizing yaw moments. Int J Autom Mech Eng 11:2639–2653

  33. Khalil H (2001) Nonlinear systems. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  34. Najjari B, Mirzaei M, Tahouni A (2022) Decentralized integration of constrained active steering and torque vectoring systems to energy-efficient stability control of electric vehicles. J Frankl Inst 359:8713–8741

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There is no acknowledgment.

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Yarinia, Mirzaei and Rafatnia. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yarinia; and then Mirzaei and Rafatnia commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Mirzaei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yarinia, N., Mirzaei, M. & Rafatnia, S. Construction of an enhanced 2-DOF finite element model for precise control of flexible beam vibration. Int. J. Dynam. Control (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-024-01441-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-024-01441-4

Keywords

Navigation