Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper focuses on the spatio-temporal CoVid-19 model. The positivity and boundedness are provided based on the standard positivity theorem. The Picard’s iteration is employed to obtain the existence and uniqueness of solution for each state variable. Due to the presence of diffusion terms, the Fourier expansion are employed to provide the locally asymptotical stability for both equilibrium points. Moreover, the appropriate Lyapunov function is a first step before proving the globally asymptotical stability for both equilibrium points. The numerical simulations conclude that the increasing of isolation rate (from \(\epsilon =0.03\) to \(\epsilon =0.9\)) is more effective than the decreasing of social distancing rate (from \(\delta =0.4\) to \(\delta =0.04\)) in reducing the number of infected individuals, where these results are based on the basic reproduction values, i.e., \(\mathcal {R}_0=0.8751<1\) for change of isolation rate and \(\mathcal {R}_0=0.9344<1\) for change of social distancing rate. The fitting results of our temporal CoVid-19 model with the observed data can be obtained through the least-square technique, neural network, and extended Kalman filter. Based on the model parameters, then we employ neural network (NN) consisting of Levenberg–Marquadt as the training function and Tangent Sigmoid and Purelin as two activation functions to fit the temporal model. The fitting results using neural network of SIQR model are significant based on the mean squared error. Due to the significant results of fitting using extended Kalman filter, we also provide this technique by choosing two tuning parameters of \(Q={\text {diag}}([10\;10\;10\;5])\) and \(R={\text {diag}}([100\;10\;10\;1])\) for the covariance of process and observation respectively. Moreover, we have the smallest RMSE and MSE of EKF in the date range of \(\mathcal {D}_1\) with the computation time 13.002942 s and the fastest computation of EKF in the date range of \(\mathcal {D}_5\) with the RMSE 0.014 and the MSE 1.9550e\(-\)04. The smallest RMSE and MSE of NN are shown in the date range of \(\mathcal {D}_1\) with the computation time 11.442112 in unit of seconds and the fastest computation of NN is provided in the date range of \(\mathcal {D}_2\) with the RMSE 0.0253 and MSE 6.4100e\(-\)04.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The observed data of this study is provided at the link: https://siagacorona.semarangkota.go.id/halaman/covid19pertahun/2020.

References

  1. Djalante R et al (2020) Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: period of January to March 2020. Prog Disaster Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahase E (2023) Covid-19: What do we know about XBB.1.5 and should we be worried? BMJ 380:153. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Demongeot J, Griette Q, Magal P (2020) SI epidemic model applied to COVID-19 data in mainland China. R Soc Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alenezi MN, Al-Anzi FS, Alabdulrazzaq H (2021) Building a sensible SIR estimation model for COVID-19 outspread in Kuwait. Alex Eng J 60(3):3161–3175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alshammari FS, Khan MA (2021) Dynamic behaviors of a modified SIR model with nonlinear incidence and recovery rates. Alex Eng J 60(3):2997–3005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ariffin MRK et al (2021) Mathematical epidemiologic and simulation modelling of first wave COVID-19 in Malaysia. Sci Rep 11(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99541-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper I, Mondal A, Antonopoulos CG (2020) A SIR model assumption for the spread of COVID-19 in different communities. Chaos Solitons Fractals 139:110057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudryashov NA, Chmykhov MA, Vigdorowitsch M (2021) Analytical features of the SIR model and their applications to COVID-19. Appl Math Model 90:466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. ud Din R, Algehyne EA (2021) Mathematical analysis of COVID-19 by using SIR model with convex incidence rate. Results Phys 23(2020):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandez PM, Fernandez-Muniz Z, Cernea A, Luis Fernandez-Martınez J, Kloczkowski A (2023) Comparison of three mathematical models for COVID-19 prediction. Biophys J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alqahtani RT (2021) Mathematical model of SIR epidemic system (COVID-19) with fractional derivative: stability and numerical analysis. Adv Differ Equ 1:2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03192-w

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Calafiore GC, Novara C, Possieri C (2020) A time-varying SIRD model for the COVID-19 contagion in Italy. Annu Rev Control 50(October):361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.10.005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Martínez V (2021) A modified SIRD model to study the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Symmetry (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nanda MA et al (2022) The susceptible-infected-recovered-dead model for long-term identification of key epidemiological parameters of COVID-19 in Indonesia. Int J Electr Comput Eng 12(3):2900–2910. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i3.pp2900-2910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cartocci A, Cevenini G, Barbini P (2021) A compartment modeling approach to reconstruct and analyze gender and age-grouped CoViD-19 Italian data for decision-making strategies. J Biomed Inform 118:103793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He S, Peng Y, Sun K (2020) SEIR modeling of the COVID-19 and its dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn 101(3):1667–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05743-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Annas S, Isbar Pratama M, Rifandi M, Sanusi W, Side S (2020) Stability analysis and numerical simulation of SEIR model for pandemic COVID-19 spread in Indonesia. Chaos Solitons Fractals 139:110072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110072

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Marinov TT, Marinova RS (2022) Adaptive SIR model with vaccination: simultaneous identification of rates and functions illustrated with COVID-19. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20276-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sepulveda G, Arenas AJ, González-Parra G (2023) Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 dynamics under two vaccination doses and delay effects. Mathematics 11(2):1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parhusip HA, Trihandaru S, Wicaksono BAA, Indrajaya D, Sardjono Y, Vyas OP (2022) Susceptible vaccine infected removed (SVIR) model for COVID-19 cases in Indonesia. Sci Technol Indones 7(3):400–408. https://doi.org/10.26554/sti.2022.7.3.400-408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuady A, Nuraini N, Sukandar KK (2021) Targeted vaccine allocation could increase the COVID-19 vaccine benefits amidst its lack of availability: a mathematical modeling study in Indonesia. Vaccines (Basel) 9:462. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9050462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Odagaki T (2020) Analysis of the outbreak of COVID-19 in Japan by SIQR model. Infect Dis Model 5(1982):691–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2020.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao Z, Feng W, Wen X, Zu L, Cheng M (2019) Dynamics of a stochastic SIQR epidemic model with standard incidence. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 527:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.121180

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Adnan et al (2022) Investigation of time-fractional SIQR Covid-19 mathematical model with fractal-fractional Mittage–Leffler kernel. Alex Eng J 61(10):7771–7779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmed N, Raza A, Rafiq M, Ahmadian A, Batool N, Salahshour S (2021) Numerical and bifurcation analysis of SIQR model. Chaos Solitons Fractals 150:111133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111133

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Yangla J et al (2023) Fractional dynamics of a Chikungunya transmission model. Sci Afr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Furati KM, Sarumi IO, Khaliq AQM (2021) Fractional model for the spread of COVID-19 subject to government intervention and public perception. Appl Math Model 95:89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Ali Z, Rabiei F, Rashidi MM, Khodadadi T (2022) A fractional-order mathematical model for COVID-19 outbreak with the effect of symptomatic and asymptomatic transmissions. Eur Phys J Plus. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02603-z

  29. Arshad S, Khalid S, Javed S, Amin N, Nawaz F (2022) Modeling the impact of the vaccine on the COVID-19 epidemic transmission via fractional derivative. Eur Phys J Plus. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02988-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Das P, Nadim SS, Das S et al (2021) Dynamics of COVID-19 transmission with comorbidity: a data driven modelling based approach. Nonlinear Dyn 106:1197–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06324-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Das P, Upadhyay RK, Misra AK et al (2021) Mathematical model of COVID-19 with comorbidity and controlling using non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination. Nonlinear Dyn 106:1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06517-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Crokidakis N (2020) CoVid-19 spreading in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Do the policies of social isolation really work? Chaos Solitons Fractals 136:109930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109930

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Crokidakis N (2020) Modeling the early evolution of the CoVid-19 in Brazil; results from susceptible-infectious-quarantined-recovered (SIQR). Int J Mod Phys C 31:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183120501351

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin Z, Pederson M (2004) Stability in a diffusive food-chain model with Michaelis–Menten functional response. Nonlinear Anal 57:421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2004.02.022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Fujimoto T, Ranade R (2004) Two characterizations of inverse positive matrices: the Hawkins–Simon condition and the Le Chatelierbraun principle. Electron J Linear Algebra ELA 11:59–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There are no funders to report for this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mohammad Ghani: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing Ananta Adhi Wardana: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing Indah Fahmiyah: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing— original draft, Writing—review and editing Ratih Ardiati Ningrum: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing— original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ghani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.

Code availability

All code was implemented in MATLAB. The source code was created by the authors themselves in this article.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghani, M., Fahmiyah, I., Ningrum, R.A. et al. Dynamical analysis of spatio-temporal CoVid-19 model. Int. J. Dynam. Control (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-024-01399-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-024-01399-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation