Skip to main content
Log in

6D trajectory, guidance and control development for air-breathing phase of reusable launch vehicle

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the development of 6D trajectory, integrated guidance and control algorithm for winged cone hypersonic air-breathing vehicle. Trajectory models aerodynamics, scramjet-based propulsion, guidance and control subsystems for the ascent phase of flight regime addressing the various coupling issues between them. Reference trajectory is generated with optimal guidance law to command angle of attack, velocity and flight path angle. Integrated controller developed here considers the longitudinal, lateral states together with translational states to track angle of attack, velocity and flight path angle of the reference trajectory and to regulate side slip and roll angle. The hybrid controller consists of a decoupling controller based on a state feedback, to decouple input/output ensuring independent control of the output variables with separate command inputs. Further, a PID controller with compensator is designed to achieve the required stability margins in each channels which improves the robustness to parameter perturbations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mirmirani M, Wu C, (2005) Air-breathing hypersonic flight vehicle modeling and control, review, challenges and a cfd based example. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 152–167

  2. Jennifer H, Pototzky AS (1997) Active control of aerothermoelastic effects for a conceptual hypersonic aircraft. J Aircr 30:453–458

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt DK (1997) Optimum mission performance and multivariable flight guidance for air-breathing launch vehicles. J Guid Control Dyn 20:1157–1164

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Murillo Jr OJ, Lu, P (2010) Fast ascent trajectory optimization for hypersonic air-breathing vehicles. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2-5 August 2010, Toronto, Ontario Canada

  5. Suzuki H, (1999) Optimal ascent trajectory and guidance law for aerospace plane. In: 37th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit and exhibit

  6. Lu P et al (2003) Closed loop endo-atmospheric ascent guidance. J Guid Control Dyn 26:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang P, etal: (2016) Hybrid optimization approach for rapid endo-atmospheric ascent trajectory planning. Int J Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol, 473–479

  8. Takayuki Y (1997) New real-time guidance strategy for aerodynamic ascent flight. Acta Astronautica 61:965–977

    Google Scholar 

  9. Corban JE, et al. (1989) Optimal guidance and propulsion control for transatmospheric vehicles. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit

  10. Mark A et al (1992) Aerospace plane guidance using time-scale decomposition and feedback linearization. J Guid Control Dyn 15:1166–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calise AJ et al (1998) Design and evaluation of a three-dimensional optimal ascent guidance algorithm. J Guid Control Dyn 21(6):867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Serrani A, et al. (2009) Integrated adaptive guidance and control of constrained non-linear air-breathing hypersonic vehicle models. In: American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA

  13. Merkulov G et al (2021) Minimum-effort impact-time control guidance using kinematics approximation. J Guid Control Dyn 10(2514/1):G006190

    Google Scholar 

  14. Groves KP, et al. (2005) Reference command tracking for a linearized model of an air-breathing hypersonic vechicle. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, 15–18

  15. Buscket H, Calise AJ (1997) Uncertainty modeling and fixed-order controller design for a hypersonic vehicle. J Guid Control Dyn 20(1):42–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lind R (2002) Linear parameter-varying modeling and control of structural dynamics with aerothermoelastic effects. J Guid Control Dyn 25(4):733–739. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tournes C et al (1998) Ramjet-powered reusable launch vehicle control by sliding modes. J Guid Control Dyn 21(3):409–415. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilcox ZD, et al. (2009) Robust nonlinear control of a hypersonic aircraft in the presence of aerothermoelastic effects. In: American Control Conference, IEEE Press,Piscataway, NJ, 2533–2538

  19. Wilcox ZD et al (2010) Lyapunov-based exponential tracking control of a hypersonic aircraft with aerothermoelastic effects. J Guid Control Dyn 33(4):1213–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilcox ZD, et al. (2008) Nonlinear sequential loop closure control design for an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle mode. In: American Control Conference,IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 3458–3463

  21. Fiorentini L et al (2009) Nonlinear robust adaptive control of flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. J Guid Control Dyn 32(2):402–416. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bialy BJ, et al. (2012) An adaptive backstepping controller for a hypersonic air-breathing missile. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation,and Control Conference

  23. An H, Wu Q (2019) Adaptive control of variable geometry inlet-configured air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. J Spacecr Rockets 56(5):1520–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Serrani A, et al. (2009) Integrated adaptive guidance and control of constrained non-linear air-breathing hypersonic vehicle models. American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12

  25. Panchal B, Talole SE (2021) Continuous-time predictive control-based integrated guidance and control. J Guid Control Dyn 40(7):1579–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. John D, et al. (1990) Hypersonic vehicle simulation model: winged-cone configuration. NASA TM-102610

  27. Maity A, Padhi R (2009) Non-linear sliding mode control design for an air-breathing engine with state estimation. In: 18th IEEE International conference on Control Application

  28. Schmidt DK, (1992) Dynamics and control of hypersonic aeropropulsive/aeroelastic vehicles. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference

  29. Groves KP, et al. (2007) Nonlinear robust/adaptive controller design for an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle model. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 20–23

  30. Bolender MA, Doman DB (2007) Nonlinear longitudinal dynamical model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle. J Spacecr Rockets 44(2):374–387. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Davidson J et al. (1999) Flight control laws for nasa’s hyper-x research vehicle. In: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  32. Doman DB, Ngo AD (2002) Dynamic inversion-based adaptive/re-configurable control of the x–33 on ascent. J Guid Control Dyn 25:275

  33. Ge D et al (2011) Multi-loop gain scheduling control of flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 7(10):5865–5880

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paraskevopoulos PN, Koumbouli FN (1991) Decoupling and pole assignment in generalised state space systems. In: IEEE Proceedings, 547–559

  35. Falb PL, Wolovich WA (1967) Decoupling in the design and synthesis of multivariable control systems. In: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 651–659

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support by Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, ISRO, for this study, the use of laboratory facilities and other resources provided are greatly acknowledged.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content or revision of the manuscript. Furthermore, each author certifies that this material or similar material has not been and will not be submitted to or published in any other publication before its appearance in the International Journal of Dynamics and Control.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rani Radhakrishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no involvement in any organization with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the material discussed in the manuscript.

Additional information

Priyadarshnam Hari, M S Harsha Simha, K Sivan have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radhakrishnan, R., Hari, P., Simha, M.S.H. et al. 6D trajectory, guidance and control development for air-breathing phase of reusable launch vehicle. Int. J. Dynam. Control 11, 2466–2483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01126-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01126-4

Keywords

Navigation