Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the impact resistance of double-layered aluminum alloy plates with diverse shapes against blunt rigid projectiles

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholars have studied the impact resistance of flat metal plates quite well. However, the connecting part of the protective end often presents other shapes, and the importance of this part for the protective effect should not be neglected. Therefore, this paper hopes to provide guidance for the lightweight design of the protective end by studying the failure mechanism of the double-layered aluminum alloy combination target plate with different shapes. In this paper, two kinds of aluminum alloys, 1100 and 7075, were firstly selected for the blunt nosed impact test, after which a 3D finite element model was established by using ABAQUS/Explicit software, and the finite element method was used to extend the model of the flat nosed projectile impacting on other shapes of double-layered target plates after verifying its accuracy. The results show that the ballistic limits are 18.56%, 6.67% and 0.43% higher than those of the opposite order for the plane, arched and L-shaped plates, where the front panel is 1100 aluminum alloys and the back panel is 7075 aluminum alloys. For hemispherical shells, however, the same arrangement results in a 10% reduction in the ballistic limit. Therefore, the effect of shape on the impact resistance should be fully considered in the design of protective ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Godzimirski J, Janiszewski J, Rośkowicz M, Surma Z (2015) Ballistic resistance tests of multi-layer protective panels. Eksploat Niezawodn 17:416–421. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2015.3.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Shi L, Wei G (2014) Experimental investigation on the ballistic performance of double-layered plates subjected to impact by projectile of high strength. Int J Impact Eng 70:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dey S, Børvik T, Hopperstad O, Leinum J, Langseth M (2004) The effect of target strength on the perforation of steel plates using three different projectile nose shapes. Int J Impact Eng 30:1005–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forrestal MJ, Børvik T, Warren TL (2010) Perforation of 7075–T651 Aluminum armor plates with 7.62 mm APM2 bullets. Exp Mech 50:1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-009-9328-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatami H, Hosseini M, Yasuri AK (2019) Perforation of thin aluminum targets under hypervelocity impact of aluminum spherical projectiles. Materials Eval 77(3):411–422

    Google Scholar 

  6. Awerbuch J(1969) Projectile penetration in metals and composite materials master thesis.lsrael Institute of Technology, Haifa, lsrael. In Hebrew.

  7. Rahman NA, Abdullah S, Abdullah MF, Zamri WFH, Omar MZ, Sajuri Z (2018) Experimental and numerical investigation on the layering configuration effect to the laminated aluminium/steel panel subjected to high speed impact test. Metals 8(9):732. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8090732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flores-Johnson E, Saleh M, Edwards L (2011) Ballistic performance of multi-layered metallic plates impacted by a 7.62-mm APM2 projectile. Int J Impact Eng 38:1022–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ning J, Song W, Yang G (2006) Failure analysis of plastic spherical shells impacted by a projectile. Int J Impact Eng 32(9):1464–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iqbal M, Tiwari G, Gupta P (2016) Energy dissipation in thin metallic shells under projectile impact. Eur J Mech A Solids 9:37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiwari G, Iqbal M, Gupta P (2018) Energy absorption characteristics of thin aluminium plate against hemispherical nosed projectile impact. Thin Wall Struct 126:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiwari G, Khaire N, Iqbal MA, Gupta PK, Gupta NK (2020) Ballistic response of double layered 1100–H12 aluminium hemispherical shell structure. Thin Wall Struct 148:106619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khaire N, Tiwari G, Iqbal MA (2021) Effect of eccentricity and obliquity on the ballistic performance and energy dissipation of hemispherical shell subjected to ogive nosed. Thin Wall Struct 161:107447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghodsbin JA, Hatami H (2017) Energy absorption performance on multilayer expanded metal tubes under axial impact. Thin Wall Struct 116:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hatami H, Shokri RM, Ghodsbin JA (2017) A theoretical analysis of the energy absorption response of expanded metal tubes under impact loads. Int J Impact Eng 109:224–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nouri M, Hatami H, Jahromi A (2015) Experimental and numerical investigation of expanded metal tube absorber under axial impact loading. Struct Eng Mech 54:1245–1266. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mullin SA, Riegel JP, Tenenbaum DA, Erdley DW (1991) Dynamic plasticity modeling of conical and blunt nosed projectiles and dual layer armor.in TACOM Combat Vehicle Survivability Symposium, Gaithersburg, MD.

  18. Deng Y, Wu H, Zhang Y, Huang X, Xiao X, Lv Y (2022) Experimental and numerical study on the ballistic resistance of 6061–T651 aluminium alloy thin plates struck by different nose shapes of projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 160:104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta PK, Iqbal MA, Mohammad Z (2017) Energy dissipation in plastic deformation of thin aluminium target subjected to projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng 110:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A Constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on ballistics, Hague, Netherlands. 541–547. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211107144

  21. Sung JH, Kim JH, Wagoner RH (2010) A plastic constitutive equation incorporating strain, strain-rate, and temperature. Int J Plast 26:1746–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fras T, Roth CC, Mohr D (2018) Fracture of high-strength armor steel under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 111:147–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roth CC, Mohr D (2016) Ductile fracture experiments with locally proportional loading histories. Int J Plast 79:328–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Børvik T, Hopperstad OS, Pedersen KO (2010) Quasi-brittle fracture during structural impact of AA7075-T651 aluminium plates. Int J Impact Eng 37:537–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holmen JK, Solberg JK, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T (2017) Ballistic impact of layered and case-hardened steel plates. Int J Impact Eng 110:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cockroft MG, Latham DJ (1968) Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Met 96:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wei G (2014) Investigation of deformation and fracture behavior associated mechanisms of the metal kintic energy projectiles. Diss dr degree harbin inst tech

  28. Xiao X, Chen L, Du T (2019) Tests and numerical simulation for shear plugging of 7075-T651 aluminium alloy targets. Shock Vib 38(03):51–58. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Recht RF, Ipson TW (1963) Ballistic perforation dynamics. J Appl Mech 30:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3636566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Teng X, Dey S, Børvik T, Wierzbicki T (2007) Protection performance of double-layered metal shields against projectile impact. J Mech Mater Struct 2:1309–1329. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2007.2.1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang X, Lu M, Deng Y (2018) Numerical Simulations of Aluminium Alloy Plates against Cube Fragment lmpacts. China Mech Eng 29(23):2887–2894. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2018.23.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongshan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Wang, Z. & Deng, Y. Evaluating the impact resistance of double-layered aluminum alloy plates with diverse shapes against blunt rigid projectiles. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 350 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04921-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04921-y

Keywords

Navigation