Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of energy absorption of cylindrical thin-walled aluminum tubes with various geometrical patterns under axial compression loading using multi-criteria decision-making methods

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the energy absorption of cylindrical thin-walled AA6061 tubes with different geometric patterns under axial loading has been experimentally analyzed and compared. The thin-walled tubes with various geometrical patterns, including solid without holes, perforated with same-size holes, perforated with regular non-size holes, and perforated with irregular non-size holes were considered as alternatives. The holes with a circular cross-section were made in all perforated tubes. Also, the initial peak force (IPF), the total absorbed energy (TAE), and the specific energy absorption of the tubes (SEA) were considered as the criteria for selecting the best energy absorber option. The Entropy method was used to assign weight to the criteria. In addition, to rank the tubes the multi-criteria decision-making methods of TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) and MOORA (multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis) were used. Examining the results showed that the perforated tube with irregular non-size holes is the best option for energy absorption considering all criteria simultaneously despite the higher initial peak of force and lower total absorbed energy than other options. In this optimal pattern, the arrangement of holes is one in the middle with 3 rows of holes, 8 holes in each row, the diameter of the small hole of 5 mm, and the diameter of the large hole of 6 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qin X, Ma Q, Gan X, Cai M, Cai W (2023) Failure analysis and multi-objective optimization of crashworthiness of variable thickness Al-CFRP hybrid tubes under multiple loading conditions. Th Walled Struct 1(184):110452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aghamirzaie M, Najibi A, Ghasemi-Ghalebahman A (2023) Energy absorption investigation of octagonal multi-layered origami thin-walled tubes under quasi-static axial loading. Int J Crashworth 28(4):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Montazeri S, Elyasi M, Moradpour A (2019) Investigating the energy absorption, SEA and crushing performance of holed and grooved thin-walled tubes under axial loading with different materials. Th Walled Struct 10(131):646–653

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dong F, Ma QH, Qin XY, Gan XH, Zhou T (2022) Failure analysis of Al/CFRP hybrid tube with initial damage during axial compression. Thin-Walled Structures 1(181):110108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moradpour A, Elyasi M, Montazeri S (2016) Developing a new thin-walled tube structure and analyzing its crushing performance for aa 60601 and mild steel under axial loading. Trans Indian Inst Met 69:1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pirmohammad S, Esmaeili-Marzdashti S (2019) Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of square and octagonal bitubal structures including different hole shapes. Thin-Walled Structures 1(139):126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan D, Qi-hua M, Xue-hui G, Tianjun Z (2021) Crashworthiness analysis of perforated metal/composite thin-walled structures under axial and oblique loading. Polym Compos 42(4):2019–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikkhah H, Baroutaji A, Olabi AG (2019) Crashworthiness design and optimisation of windowed tubes under axial impact loading. Th Walled Struct 1(142):132–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohamed Ismail NM (2023) Performance analysis and optimization of square tubes with different shapes, sizes, and patterns of holes under axial compression loading. Int J Crashworth 27:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elyasi M, Rooholamini Ahangar M, Modanloo V (2023) Improving energy absorption of AA6061 holed thin-walled cylindrical tubes. Modares Mech Eng 23(11):587–595

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elyasi M, Modanloo V (2024) Assessment of energy absorption and crushing performance of perforated thin-walled AA6061-O tubes with irregular holes under axial compression loading. Arab J Sci Eng 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Q, Zha Y, Dong B, Gan X (2020) Structure design and multiobjective optimization of CFRP/aluminum hybrid crash box. Polym Compos 41(10):4202–4220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moradian M, Modanloo V, Aghaiee S (2019) Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body. J Traffic Trans Eng Engl Ed 6(5):526–534

    Google Scholar 

  14. Akhoundi B, Modanloo V (2023) A multi-criteria decision-making analysis on the extrusion-based additive manufacturing of ABS/Cu composites. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 17:1995–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ceballos B, Lamata MT, Pelta DA (2016) A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Prog Art Intell 5:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karande P, Chakraborty S (2012) Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des 1(37):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Modanloo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Modanloo, V., Elyasi, M. Comparison of energy absorption of cylindrical thin-walled aluminum tubes with various geometrical patterns under axial compression loading using multi-criteria decision-making methods. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 257 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04856-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04856-4

Keywords

Navigation