Skip to main content
Log in

Rough surface modeling and contact analysis based on micro-scale spherical roller bearing

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on Gaussian random function, the micro-contact model of spherical roller bearing is established by reverse engineering, and the contact states of surfaces with different roughness are calculated. The contact characteristics of contact surface such as equivalent stress, contact stress, contact area ratio and relative fatigue life are studied. Then, the accuracy of finite element calculation is verified by rough surface contact experiment. The results show that with the increase of displacement load, the equivalent stress and contact stress of contact surface increase, and the contact area ratio of rough contact surface increases steadily. With the decrease of roughness, the fatigue life of contact surface increases slightly. When the contact surface is close to smooth, the fatigue life of the contact surface is significantly improved, and the equivalent stress is significantly reduced: as the roughness of the contact surface is close to the target surface, the contact stress of the contact surface is significantly reduced. The results show that the roughness surface Ra = 0.05 μm has good performance in the aspects of equivalent stress, contact area and fatigue life. The contact stress of the roughness surface Ra = 0.4 μm has a minimum value, which provides a reference for selecting the machining accuracy of the contact surface of spherical roller bearings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ra:

Contour arithmetic mean deviation

Rz:

Contour maximum height

A * :

The height data of rough surface

p :

The value of Ra of the reference contour

z :

Variance

M :

Matrix

X′, Y′, Z′:

The three-way coordinates of the rough surface

Rsm:

The spacing characteristic parameter

x′, y′, z′:

The three-way coordinates of the smooth surface

ρ :

Density

E :

Elastic modulus

μ :

Poisson’s ratio

Rm:

Tensile strength

σ s :

Yield strength

K :

The probability of survival

N :

The number of stress cycles

e :

The slope of Weibull distribution

V :

The volume obtained by integrating the stress

τ eq :

Von Mises stress

f :

The stress index

σ 1 :

The first principal stress

σ 2 :

The second principal stress

σ 3 :

The third principal stress

N 1 :

The stress cycles of smooth surface

N 2 :

The stress cycles of rough surface

L r :

The fatigue life

ΔS :

The displacement load

δ :

The contact area rate

a, b :

The value factors of the formula, corresponding to different roughness fitting formulas.

x :

The force response value

f(x) :

The equivalent stress value

References

  1. Li L, Yun QQ, Tian HF (2011) Investigation into the contact characteristics of rough surfaces with surface tension. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1847-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiling C, Jinyuan T, Duo Y (2022) Sensitivity analysis of tooth surface roughness parameters and contact stress. J Northwest Polytech Univ 40(04):883–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang S, Yao XF, Yang H (2019) Measurement and evaluation on contact stress at the rubber contact interface. Measurement 146:856–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xun S, Wei W, Kun L (2020) Construction of finite element model and contact analysis of microscopic random rough surface. Lubr Eng 45(05):25–29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olshevskiy A, Yang HI, Kim C-W (2012) Finite element simulation of inelastic contact for arbitrarily shaped rough bodies. Proc IMechE Part C J Mech Eng Sci 226(C3):595–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406211417216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Chen Y, Yang Yi (2014) A fatigue and low-energy shock-based approach to predict fatigue life. J Mech Sci Technol 28:3977–3984

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Greerwood JA, Willimson JBP (1966) Contact of naminally flat surfaces. Proc Royal Soc A295:300–319

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan Y, Gan L, Liu K (2017) Elastoplastic contact mechanics model of rough surface based on fractal theory. Chin J Mech Eng 30(1):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1990) Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. ASME J Tribol 112:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1991) Fractal model of elastic-plastic contact between rough surfaces. ASME J Tribol 113:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11(7):674–693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jesrer P, Menke C, Urban K (2012) Wavelet methods for the representation, analysis and simulation of optical surfaces. IMA J Appl Math 77(4):495–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamat/hxr030

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Shu wen R, Xian ming L, Xiao hua L (2022) Measurement of three-dimensional virtual image of head up display based on binocular vision. J Opt 42(19):58–65

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yong wu Z, Yan ming Lv, Jian zhong J (2007) A new elastoplastic contact model for rough surfaces. Chin J Mech Eng. 43(3):95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Run qiong W, Li da Z, Chun xia Z (2018) Research on contact stiffness model of joint surface based on interaction between domain expansion factor and micro-convex body. J Mech Eng 54(19):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu YJ, Cui Y, Zhang HX (2022) Considering the deformation of base metal static seal asperity contact model. Tribology 43(4):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee J, Beheshti A, Polycarpou A (2017) A rough surface normal nanocontact stiffness: experimental measurements and rough surface contact model predictions. J Appl Mech-Trans ASME 84(3):031006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao G, Li Y, Zhang Z (2022) Simulation and experiment of secondary contactstiffness of rough surface. J Mech Sci Technol 36:1079–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhai CP, Hanaor D, Proust G (2017) Stress-dependent electrical contact resistance at fractal rough surfaces. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shao lei Wu, Feng Yu, Kai Wu (2018) Construction and simulation analysis of 3D rough surface electrical contact model based on finite element. J Hefei Univ Technol (Nat Sci Edition) 9(11):1441–14455

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson WE, Angadi SV, Jackson RL (2011) Surface separation and contact resistance considering sinusoidal elastic-plastic multi-scale rough surface contact. Wear 268(1–2):190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2009.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bennett AL, Schulze HKL (2017) Contact measurements of randomly rough surfaces. Tribol lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0918-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jamal M, Morgan MN (2017) Materials characterization part I: contact area of the Berkovich indenter for nanoindentation tests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0115-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu SL, Feng Y, Wu K (2018) Construction and simulation analysis of 3D rough surface electrical contact model based on finite element. J HEFEI Univ Technol 41(11):1441–1445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ming Chen performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; Qiang Bian performed the experiment and data analyses; Guang Zeng contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; Chunjiang Zhao helped perform part of the finite element analysis. Lianyun Jiang contributed to the conception of the study; Xiangyun Zhang helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions; Bowen Jiao helped perform the chart.

Funding

This research work supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.20201102003), Key Research and Development Projects in Shanxi province (grant number 201903D421031), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51375325).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunjiang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Jarir Mahfoud.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Bian, Q., Zeng, G. et al. Rough surface modeling and contact analysis based on micro-scale spherical roller bearing. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 616 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04530-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04530-1

Keywords

Navigation