Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of different core configurations on the skin core bonding of sandwich composites

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a sandwich structure, debonding of skin and core is a critical issue. To improve skin–core bonding, T and dovetail shaped grooves were made on both sides of foam core and with these grooved cores, sandwich composites were prepared by vacuum infusion process. Epoxy resin mixed with milled glass fibers was used as the matrix. Sandwich specimens were subjected to flexural, compressive, and tensile tests according to ASTM standards, and the results are compared with standard specimens with plain core. On observing the failed specimens under flexural test, it is evident that plain and T grooved specimens experienced both debonding and core shear failures. Failure modes like skin crushing, micro-buckling and significant core shear are observed in the specimens with plain and T grooved specimens during compression test. The highest mechanical properties were demonstrated by specimens with dovetail grooves among the three types of specimens considered in this investigation. Compared to plain specimen, dovetail specimens showed 40% increase in the flexural strength, 82% increase in the compressive strength and 136% increase in the flatwise tensile strength. SEM images of fractured specimens indicate the major failure modes such as core shear, debonding in the specimens subjected to flexural testing. Based on this study, it is suggested to use cores with dovetail grooves instead of plain cores to manufacture sandwich composites in order to achieve enhanced skin–core bonding leading to superior mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fathi A, Wolff-Fabris F, Altstädt V, Gätzi R (2013) An investigation on the flexural properties of balsa and polymer foam core sandwich structures: influence of core type and contour finishing options. J Sandw Struct Mater 15(5):487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636213487004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Imielińska K, Guillaumat L, Wojtyra R, Castaings M (2008) Effects of manufacturing and face/core bonding on impact damage in glass/polyester–PVC foam core sandwich panels. Compos B Eng 39(6):1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birman V, Chandrashekhara K, Hopkins MS, Volz JS (2013) Effects of nanoparticle impregnation of polyurethane foam core on the performance of sandwich beams. Compos B Eng 46:234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saha MC, Kabir ME, Jeelani S (2006) Core/skin debond fracture toughness of S2-glass/epoxy sandwich composites with nanophased polyurethane core. Society for Experimental Mechanics

  5. Bragagnolo G, Crocombe AD, Ogin SL, Mohagheghian I, Sordon A, Meeks G, Santoni C (2020) Investigation of skin-core debonding in sandwich structures with foam cores. Mater Des 186:108312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel IM, Gdoutos EE, Wang KA, Abot JL (2002) Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. Int J Damage Mech 11(4):309–334. https://doi.org/10.1106/105678902027247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitra N, Patra AK, Singh SP, Mondal S, Datta PK, Varshney SK (2020) Interfacial delamination in glass-fiber/polymer-foam-core sandwich composites using singlemode–multimode–singlemode optical fiber sensors: Identification based on experimental investigation. J Sandw Struct Mater 22(1):40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636217733983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grove SM, Popham E, Miles ME (2006) An investigation of the skin/core bond in honeycomb sandwich structures using statistical experimentation techniques. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37(5):804–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yokozeki T, Iwamoto K (2016) Effects of core machining configuration on the debonding toughness of foam core sandwich panels. Adv Compos Mater 25(1):45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2014.958302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez A, Mahfuz H, Sabet M (2019) Enhancing Debond fracture toughness of sandwich composites for marine current turbine blades. OCEANS 2019 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, Seattle, WA, USA. https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS40490.2019.8962799

  11. Majumdar P, Srinivasagupta D, Mahfuz H, Joseph B, Thomas MM, Christensen S (2003) Effect of processing conditions and material properties on the debond fracture toughness of foam-core sandwich composites experimental optimization. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 34(11):1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00207-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Devaraj SJ, Arputham AJ (2022) Influence of chopped fibers on the interfacial bonding of glass fiber reinforced epoxy skin/polyurethane core in a sandwich composite. Polym Compos 43(8):5563–5572. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahabadi HM, Farrokhabadi A, Rahimi GH (2020) Investigation of debonding growth between composite skins and corrugated foam-composite core in sandwich panels under bending loading. Eng Fract Mech 230:106987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farmand-Ashtiani E, Cugnoni J, Botsis J (2013) Monitoring and characterization of the interfacial fracture in sandwich composites with embedded multiplexed optical sensors. Compos Struct 96:476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pareta AS, Gupta R, Panda SK (2020) Experimental investigation on fly ash particulate reinforcement for property enhancement of PU foam core FRP sandwich composites. Compos Sci Technol 195:108207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fang H, Liu W, Lu W, Wan L (2010) Flexural properties of grooved perforation sandwich composites. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed 25:583–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-010-0048-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu J, Tao J, Li F, Zhao Z (2020) Flexural properties of a novel foam core sandwich structure reinforced by stiffeners. Constr Build Mater 235:117475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tao J, Li F, Zhao Q, Zhang D, Zhao Z (2018) In-plane compression properties of a novel foam core sandwich structure reinforced by stiffeners. J Reinf Plast Compos 37:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417737631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Muthu J, Dendere C (2014) Functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes strengthened GRP hybrid composites: improved properties with optimum fiber content. Compos B Eng 67:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anbusagar NR, Palanikumar K, Giridharan PK (2015) Study of sandwich effect on nanoclay modified polyester resin GFR face sheet laminates. Compos Struct 125:336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patra A, Mitra N (2014) Interface fracture of sandwich composites: influence of MWCNT sonicated epoxy resin. Compos Sci Technol 101:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Çetin ME (2021) The effect of carbon nanotubes modified polyurethane adhesive on the impact behavior of sandwich structures. Polym Compos 42(9):4353–4365. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Çetin ME (2022) Investigation of carbon nanotube reinforcement to polyurethane adhesive for improving impact performance of carbon fiber composite sandwich panels. Int J Adhes Adhes 112:103002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Juliyana M, Krishnan RS (2019) Development of button shear keys to improve the debonding resistance of sandwich composite panel. Mater Today Proc 16:720–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mancuso A, Pitarresi G, Tumino D (2015) Mechanical behaviour of a green sandwich made of flax reinforced polymer facings and cork core. Procedia Eng 109:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nazari A (2021) An experimental investigation on the flexural and wear properties of multiscale nanoclay/basalt fiber/epoxy composites. Polym Compos 42(11):5755–5762. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Q, Shaw MT, Parnas RS, McDonnell AM (2006) Investigation of basalt fiber composite mechanical properties for applications in transportation. Polym Compos 27(1):41–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saravanakumar K, Arumugam V, Souhith R, Santulli C (2020) Influence of milled glass fiber fillers on mode I & mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of epoxy resin for fabrication of glass/epoxy composites. Fibers 8(6):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib8060036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Selver E, Kaya G (2019) Flexural properties of sandwich composite laminates reinforced with glass and carbon Z-pins. J Compos Mater 53(10):1347–1359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998318800146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohamed M, Anandan S, Huo Z, Birman V, Volz J, Chandrashekhara K (2015) Manufacturing and characterization of polyurethane based sandwich composite structures. Compos Struct 123:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fotsing EA, Leclerc C, Sola M, Ross A, Ruiz E (2016) Mechanical properties of composite sandwich structures with core or face sheet discontinuities. Compos B Eng 88:229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vadakke V, Carlsson LA (2004) Experimental investigation of compression failure of sandwich specimens with face/core debond. Compos B Eng 35(6–8):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mahfuz H, Islam MS, Rangari VK, Saha MC, Jeelani S (2004) Response of sandwich composites with nanophased cores under flexural loading. Compos B Eng 35(6–8):543–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yalkin HE, Icten BM, Alpyildiz T (2015) Enhanced mechanical performance of foam core sandwich composites with through the thickness reinforced core. Compos B Eng 79:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khalili S, Khalili SM, Farsani RE, Mahajan P (2020) Flexural properties of sandwich composite panels with glass laminate aluminum reinforced epoxy facesheets strengthened by SMA wires. Polym Test 89:106641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yalkin HE, Icten BM, Alpyildiz T (2017) Tensile and compressive performances of foam core sandwich composites with various core modifications. J Sandw Struct Mater 19(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636216650819

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors convey their heartfelt gratitude to Armacell India Pvt Ltd for supplying ArmaPET Struct GR70 core material used to manufacture sandwich composites.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India

    D. Selwyn Jebadurai & A. Arul Jeya Kumar

Authors
  1. D. Selwyn Jebadurai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Arul Jeya Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by DSJ and AAJK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by DSJ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Arul Jeya Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jebadurai, D.S., Kumar, A.A.J. Influence of different core configurations on the skin core bonding of sandwich composites. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 391 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04334-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04334-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation