Skip to main content
Log in

Applying a multivariable and adaptive control to a turbocharger test bench

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Turbochargers have been widely used in internal combustion engines to enhance their power output and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. To investigate turbochargers dynamics and their interaction with internal combustion engines, standardized experimental tests are usually performed to acquire their thermodynamic and rotordynamic behaviors. In our setup, which includes a fixed-size turbocharger with a combustion chamber simulating automotive engines, the turbine’s inlet temperature and the compressor speed must be controlled to achieve transient regimes. Therefore, we conducted experimental tests to demonstrate that our setup exhibits multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) system characteristics with two inputs and two outputs. Both the valves that regulate the amount of fuel powering the combustion chamber and control the air that speeds up the compressor affect the turbine’s inlet temperature and compressor speed. Additionally, turbochargers work at various operating points and may face distinct thermodynamic characteristics. Therefore, we applied steps to these valves for different compressor speeds, generating step responses with significant differences, indicating that adaptive control is also recommended. Thus, we proposed designing a multivariable controller to regulate the turbocharger speed and the exhaust air temperature simultaneously, in order to achieve enough accuracy to create turbocharger operating maps. Multivariable control design techniques were used to define the controller. We also proposed the use of a machine learning model that recognizes the plant’s operating point based on the turbocharger shaft speed data gathered during the tests. In this work, we compared the results of the single-input single-output (SISO) controller already in place at the plant with the controller obtained through the proposed methodology. We evaluated the step response through simulations for the turbocharger axis speed and the temperature at the turbine inlet, considering variations in the reference values of these variables. Results indicated that the controller from the methodology presented in this work can perform decoupling for the multivariable system and can be adjusted according to the plant’s operating point. This led to less oscillatory responses and smaller errors compared to the reference values. Compared to the SISO controller, MIMO yielded a significant reduction in speed errors of nearly 70% and 85% for operating points at 50 krpm and 115 krpm, and also presented lower temperature mean absolute errors for temperature setpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis S, Boundy RG (2021) Transportation energy data book: Edition 39, Tech. rep., Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

  2. Fontaras G, Zacharof N-G, Ciuffo B (2017) Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe - Laboratory versus real-world emissions. Prog Energy Combust Sci 60:97–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woon Jang Y, Park I-S, Ha S-S, Jang S-H, Chung K-W, Lee G, Kim W-H, Choi Y-J, Cho C-H (2014) Preliminary analysis of the development of the Carbon Tracker system in Latin America and the Caribbean. Atmósfera 27(1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-6236(14)71101-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodríguez ORS (2019) Metodologias de caracterização de falhas no compressor centrífugo de turbocompressores automotivos

  5. Sandoval OR, Machado LH, Caetano B, Lara IF, Molina R (2018) Influence of temperature and injection pressure of lubrication in the vibration of an automotive turbocharger. In: International conference on rotor dynamics, Springer, pp 388–397

  6. Sandoval OR, Machado LHJ, Hanriot VM, Troysi F, Faria MTC (2022) Acoustic and vibration analysis of a turbocharger centrifugal compressor failure. Eng Fail Anal 139:106447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Machado LHJ, Sandoval OR, Pereira JVMC, de Souza JPB, Pujatti FJP, Faria MTC (2022) Experimental thermodynamic analysis of automotive turbochargers using fluid film bearings with different groove shapes. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 44(7):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Machado LHJ, Sandoval OR, Pereira JVMC, de Souza JPB, Caetano BC, Hanriot VM, Pujatti FJP, de Faria MTC (2022) Influence of fluid film bearings with different axial groove shapes on automotive turbochargers: an experimental study. Lubricants 10(5):92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandoval OR, Fonda MV, Roso VR, da Costa RBR, Valle RM, Baêta JGC (2019) Computational technique for turbocharger transient characterization using real driving conditions data. Energy 186:115822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teixeira JAG, Sandoval OR, Caetano BC, Baeta JGC (2020) Turbocharger performance prediction: a review of map modelling

  11. Wang Y-Y, Haskara I, Yaniv O (2011) Quantitative feedback design of air and boost pressure control system for turbocharged diesel engines. Control Eng Pract 19(6):626–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ammann M, Fekete NP, Guzzella L, Glattfelder AH (2003) Model-based control of the vgt and egr in a turbocharged common-rail diesel engine: theory and passenger car implementation. SAE Trans 527–538

  13. Skogestad S, Postlethwaite I (2007) Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design, vol 2. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen-Schäfer H (2015) Rotordynamics of automotive turbochargers. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorf RC, Bishop RH (2011) Modern control systems. Pearson

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Bristol E (1966) On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 11(1):133–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Falb P, Wolovich W (1967) Decoupling in the design and synthesis of multivariable control systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 12(6):651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seborg DE, Mellichamp DA, Edgar TF, Doyle FJ III (2010) Process dynamics and control. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  19. Normey-Rico JE (2007) Control of dead-time processes. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith CA, Corripio AB (2005) Principles and practices of automatic process control. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vítor M. Hanriot.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Mario Eduardo Santos Martins.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanriot, V.M., Sandoval, O.R. & Maia, A.A.T. Applying a multivariable and adaptive control to a turbocharger test bench. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 416 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04292-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04292-w

Keywords

Navigation