Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive diagnosis with artificial neural network for automated electric vehicle

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The requirements and availability of the electric powertrain will be significantly increased with the introduction of automated driving functions. In this case, the mechanical fallback level of the driver must be replaced by a fault-tolerant system. New concepts such as the predictive diagnostic or customized operation strategies ensure the fault tolerance. An essential component to realize the requirements is the electric drive. In the present work, a method for the prediction of the fault condition in permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) is developed based on artificial neural networks (ANN). Not only the failure occurrence is detected, but also the severity of the failure is predicted and classified. For this purpose, a suitable failure indicator is needed, which contradicts the severity of the failure and thus allows both the prediction and degradation (protection) of the system. The prerequisite for the use of machine learning methods, such as artificial neural networks, is the existence of a database. Data is obtained with the help of simulation model of PMSM, which can be corrected with failures. Features from the phase currents and the battery current in the time domain and in the frequency domain are presented as well as classical methods such as the wavelet analysis or the decomposition into symmetrical components. The selection of the features has a great influence on the diagnostic result and on the performance of the algorithm. The failures are represented by the features in the frequency domain. Based on these aspects, several neural networks are formed. To predict the failure, an accuracy of about 95% is achieved and for the classification an accuracy of about 98.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig.14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AI:

Artificial intelligent

AME:

Adaptive moment estimation

ANN:

Artificial neural networks

EMF:

Electromotive force

EM:

Electric machine

FOC:

Field-oriented control

PMSM:

Permanent-magnet-synchronous-motors

\({\varvec{\omega}}\) :

Angular velocity (rad/s)

\({\varvec{f}}\) :

Frequency (Hz)

\({\varvec{\varphi }}\) :

Angel (rad)

\({\varvec{n}}\) :

Speed (rpm)

\({\varvec{T}}\) :

Torque (Nm)

\({\varvec{i}}_{{{\varvec{abc}}}}\) :

Phase current (A)

\({\varvec{v}}_{{{\varvec{abc}}}}\) :

Phase voltage (V)

\({\varvec{i}}_{{{\varvec{d}},{\varvec{q}}}}\) :

Current (A)

\({\varvec{i}}_{{{\text{bat}}}}\) :

Battery current (A)

\({\varvec{L}}\) :

Self-inductance (H)

\({\varvec{M}}\) :

Mutual inductance (H)

\({\varvec{R}}\) :

Resistance (Ω)

\({\varvec{e}}\) :

Induced voltage (Back-EMF) (V)

\({\varvec{P}}\) :

Power (W)

\({\varvec{R}}_{{\varvec{f}}}\) :

Failure resistance (Ω)

\({\varvec{\eta}}\) :

Number of short-circuited windings

\({\varvec{i}}_{{{\text{circ}}}}\) :

Failure current (A)

\(\Delta {\varvec{P}}_{{{\text{loss}}}}\) :

Differential power (W)

\(\Delta {\varvec{P}}_{{{\text{nom}}}}\) :

Adjusted differential power

\({\varvec{p}}\) :

Number of pole pairs

\({\varvec{\lambda}}\) :

Magnetic flux of permanent magnet (weber)

References

  1. McKinsey & Company, automotive revolution—perspective towards 2030, Visual Media Europe, 2016.

  2. Kilic A, Fassnacht J, Shen T, Thulfaut C (2019) Fail-operational powertrain for future mobilit, MTZ–motortechnische zeitschrift, ausgabe, ISBN: 0024–8525, 66–69

  3. Kilic A (2021) New fail operational powernet methods and topologies for automated driving with electric vehicle. Turk J Electr Eng Comp Sci 29:1092–1105

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kilic A (2020) Dimensioning of fail-operational powertrain for automated driving. Int J Automot Eng Technol 9:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen T, Kilic A, Thulfaut C, Reuss H C (2019) An intelligent diagnostic method for permanent magnet synchronousmotors (PMSM) in the electric drive for automated vehicles. In: 21st European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Genova, Italy. 1–10

  6. Araz HK, Yilmaz M (2020) Design procedure and implementation of a high-efficiency PMSM with reduced magnetmass and torque-ripple for electric vehicles. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 35:1089–1110

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu H, Deng J, Li Y (2021) A diagnosis method of semiconductor power switch open-circuit fault in the PMSM drive system with the MPCC method. IEEE Access 9:109822–109832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Szabo V, Hasan E S, Choux M, and Goodwin M (2022) ITSC Fault diagnosis in permanent magnet synchronous motor drives using shallow CNNs. International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks.

  9. Naseri F, Schaltz E, Lu K, Farjah E (2020) Real-time open-switch fault diagnosis in automotive permanent magnet synchronous motor drives based on Kalman filter. IET Power Electron 13:2413–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Orlowska-Kowalska T, Wolkiewicz M, Pietrzak P, Skowron M, Ewert P, Tarchala G, Krzysztofiak M, Kowalski CT (2022) Fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control of PMSM drives-state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Access 10:59979–60024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee S, Kim K, Shim M, Nam I, A, (2021) Digital signal processing based detection circuit for short-circuit protection of SiC MOSFET. IEEE Transact Power Electron 36:13379–13382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen T, Pan Y, Xiong Z (2020) A hybrid system model-based open- circuit fault diagnosis method of three-phase voltage-source inverters for PMSM drive systems. Electronics 9:1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Obeid NH, Battiston A, Boileau T, Nahid-Mobarakeh B (2017) Early intermittent interturn fault detection and localization for a permanent magnet synchronous motor of electrical vehicles using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Transp Electrific 3:694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schump D (1990) Testing to assure reliable operation of electric motors. Forty-Second Annual Conference of Electrical Engineering Problems in the Rubber and Plastics Industries. 41–46.

  15. Stone GC, Culbert I, Boulter EA, Dhirani H (2004) Electrical insulation for rotating machines: design, evaluation, aging, testing, and repair. Wiley-IEEE Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mazzoletti MA, Bossio GR, Angelo CHD (2017) A model-based strategy for interturn short-circuit fault diagnosis in PMSM. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 64:7218–7228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khov M, Regnier J, Faucher J (2008) Detection of turn short-circuit faults in stator of PMSM by on-line parameter estimation. In: 2008 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion. 161–166.

  18. Yu H, Deng J, Li Y (2021) A diagnosis method of semiconductor power switch open-circuit fault in the PMSM drive system with the MPCC method. IEEE Access 9:09822–109832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang W, Luo L, Du J, Xiang B, Mei S, Zhou L, Fan Q (2022) Open-circuit fault detection in PMSM drives using model predictive control and cost function error. IEEE Trans Transp Electrific 8:2667–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nejad MAS, Taghipour M (2011) Inter-turn stator winding fault diagnosis and determination of fault percent in PMSM. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Colloquium (IAPEC), pp 128–131

  21. Quiroga J, Liu L and Cartes D A (2008) Fuzzy logic based fault detection of PMSM stator winding short under load fluctuation using negative sequence analysis. In: American Control Conference 4262–4267.

  22. Ping Z A, Juan Y, Ling W (2013) Fault detection of stator winding interturn short circuit in pmsm based on wavelet packet analysis. In: Fifth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. 566–569.

  23. Cira F, Arkan M, Gumus B (2016) Detection of stator winding inter-turn short circuit faults in permanent magnet synchronous motors and automatic classification of fault severity via a pattern recognition system. JEET J Electr Eng Technol 11:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quiroga J, Cartes D A, Edrington C S, and Liu L (2008) Neural network based fault detection of PMSM stator winding short under load fluctuation. In: Proc. 13th Int Power Electron Motion Control Conf 793–798

  25. Chuang C, Wei Z, Zhifu W, Zhi L (2017) The diagnosis method of stator winding faults in PMSMs based on SOM neural networks. Energy Proc 105:2295–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sa B A, Barros C M V, Siebra C A, and Barros L S (2019) A multilayer perceptron-based approach for stator fault detection in permanent magnet wind generators. IEEE PES Innov Smart Grid Technol Conf Latin Amer (ISGT Latin Amer.) 1–6

  27. Lee H, Jeong H, and Kim S W (2019) Detection of interturn short-circuit fault and demagnetization fault in IPMSM by 1-D convolutional neural network. IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power Energy Eng Conf (APPEEC) 1–5

  28. Maraaba LS, Milhem AS, Nemer IA, Al-Duwaish H, Abido MA (2020) Convolutional neural network-based inter-turn fault diagnosis in LSPMSMs. IEEE Access 8:81960–81970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Skowron M, Orlowska-Kowalska T, Kowalski CT (2021) Application of simplified convolutional neural networks for initial stator winding fault detection of the PMSM drive using different raw signal data. IET Electr Power Appl 15:932–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dai X, Zhang Y, Qiao L, and Sun D (2021) Fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on improved probabilistic neural network. 40th Chin. Control Conf. (CCC). 2767–2772.

  31. Doncker RD, Pulle DW, Veltman A (2011) Advanced electrical drives. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Binder A (2012) Elektrische maschinen und antriebe. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Trommer M, Wenzel A, Walther C (2016) Neuronale netze vs. support-vektor-maschinen–ein direkter vergleich der klassifikationsmethoden für komplexe biologische Daten, 26. Workshop Computational Intelligence Proceedings, Dortmund.

  34. Kingma DP, Ba JL (2015) ADAM: A Method for stochastic optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 13

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Kilic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Rogério Sales Gonçalves.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilic, A. Predictive diagnosis with artificial neural network for automated electric vehicle. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03857-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03857-5

Keywords

Navigation