Skip to main content
Log in

Orthodromic navigation through conic rotation driven by active universal joints with three degrees of freedom

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The universal joint is a senior machine element. With the purpose of exploring new applications this paper focuses on active universal joints with three degrees of freedom. This means to embed small motors acting on its gimbals. The objective of this study is therefore to investigate the viability of the proposition through an experiment and formulate a mathematical model that allows for exploring the limits of the design using numerical simulations. A specific joint was designed and manufactured that included, in addition to the driving motor, two further drives at the crosshead. In terms of the operation of the system, this study aimed to investigate its limitations and analyze its kinematics and dynamics, identifying the backlash and possible impact torque. A new approach was proposed for the control of the active universal joint by moving the manipulator’s end-effector from one point to another on an orthodromic trajectory. The orthodromic trajectory is related to a fixed Euler vector, which is presented in a conical motion context combined with a spin motion of the end-effector. Numerical results using the physical model were compared to the experimental results to determine the application limits of the joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aspragathos NA, Koustoumpardis PN, Moulianitis VC (2018) Advances in service and industrial robotics. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region (RAAD 2018), Mechanisms and Machine Science 67. Springer, Switzerland.

  2. Carbone G, Ceccarelli M, Pisla D (2019) New trends in medical and service robotics: advances in theory and practice, mechanisms and machine science, vol 65. Springer, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao Z, Zhao J, Liu H, Zhang Z (2013) Development of a cardan mechanism for the asteroid lander. Int J Smart Sens Intell Syst 6(3):1283–1297

    Google Scholar 

  4. Derbel N, Ghommam J, Zhu Q (2019) New developments and advances in robot control, studies in systems, decision and control, vol 175. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Akpolat ZH, Bingöl MC, Ay M, Koc GO, Bal C, Korkmaz D (2017) Dynamic model and simulation of one active joint robotic fish. NWSAENS Engineering Sciences (ISSN: 1308 7231)

  6. Liu B, Liu M, Liu X, Tuo X, Wang X, Zhao S, Xiao T (2019) Design and realize a snake-like robot in complex environment. J Robot 2019:9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Um Z, Wang H, Xu W, Liu T, Wang H (2017) Two types of snake-like robots for complex environment exploration: design, development, and experiment. Adv Mech Eng 9(9):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattacharya S, Singla A, Abhimanyu D, Dholakiya S, Bhatnagar B, Amrutur A, Ghosal, Kolathaya S (2019) Learning active spine behaviors for dynamic and efficient locomotion in quadruped robots. CoRR abs/1905.06077

  9. Mutlu M, Hauser S, Bernadino A, Ijspeert AJ (2018) Effects of passive and active joint compliance in quadrupedal locomotion. J Adv Robot 32(15):809–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sreedhar M, Pavan B, Anirudh DV, Krishna GS (2019) Review on bio-mimitic robotic bird. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev (IJTSRD) 3(3):1259–1263

  11. Zhang D, Wei B (2017) Mechatronics and robotics engineering for advanced and intelligent manufacturing—Springer—lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mghames S, Catalano MG, Bicchi A, Grioli G (2019) A spherical active joint for humanoids and humans. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 4(2):838–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pisla D, Gherman B, Vaida C, Plitea N (2012) Kinematic modelling of a 5-DOF hybrid parallel robot for laparoscopic surger. Robotica 30:1095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Stubblefield KA, Lock BA, Huang H, Williams TW III, Weir RF, Kuiken TA (2008) Control of a six degree-of-freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(11):2057–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cardozo WS, Weber HI (2017) Dynamic modeling of a 2 dof parallel electrohydraulic-actuated homokinetic platform. Mech Mach Theory 118:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai K, Xu R, Lee K-M, Dai W, Huang Y (2018) Design and development of a spherical motor for conformal printing of curved electronics. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(11):9190–9200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang F, Zeng L, Zhu Z-D, Sun J (2016) Electromagnetic driving modal and control of magnetic levitation spherical active joint. In: 3rd annual international conference on mechanics and mechanical engineering (MME 2016), advances in engineering research (AER), volume 105

  18. Houran MA, Yang X, Chen W (2018) Free angular-positioning wireless power transfer using a spherical joint. A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996–1073)

  19. Stamenić Z, Ristivojević M, Tasić M, Mitrović R (2012) Influence of the geometry parameters of cardan joint rolling parts on the load distribution. FME Trans 40:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krude W (1977) USA Patent US4156354A—angularly flexible cardan shaft joint

  21. Cardozo WS, Weber HI (2018) A compact formulation for constant velocity joint kinematics. Mech Mach Theory 121:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krude W (1974) USA Patent https://patents.google.com/patent/US4012925A—Constant velocity torque transmitting joint

  23. Froehlic T, Reiser U (2016) Design and implementation of a spherical joint for mobile manipulators. In: International symposium on robotics (ISR), ISBN 978–3–8007–4231–8, ISR 2016 Munich, Germany)

  24. Gallardo-Alvarado J, Rodriguez-Castro R, Perez-Gonzalez L, Aguilar-Najera CR (2018) Kinematics of the 3(RPSP)-S fully spherical parallel manipulator by means of screw theory. A special issue of Robotics (ISSN 2218–6581)

  25. Manfredi L, Cuschieri A (2018) Design of a 2 DOFs mini hollow joint actuated with SMA wires. Materials 11(10):2014

  26. Yeshmukhametov A, Koganezawa K, Yamamoto Y (2018) Design and kinematics of cable-driven continuum robot arm with universal joint backbone. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, pp 2444–2449

  27. Palpacelli M, Carbonari L, Palmieri G, Callegari M (2018) Design of a lockable spherical joint for a reconfigurable 3-URU parallel platform. Kinematics and Robot Design I, KaRD2018

  28. Huang H, Dong E, Xu M, Yang J, Low KH (2017) Mechanism design and kinematic analysis of a robotic manipulator driven by joints with two degrees of freedom (DOF). Int J Robot Res Appl 45(1):34–43

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shammas E, Wolf A, Chose H (2006) Three degrees-of-freedom joint for spatial hyper-redundant robots. Mech Mach Theory 41(2):170–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Musser CW (1955) Strain wave gearing. Patent US2906143A

  31. Vranish JM (2003) Gear bearings. USA Patent US-PATENT-6,626,792, US-PATENT-APPL-SN-799872

  32. Nordin M, Gutman P-O (2002) Controlling mechanical systems with backlash—a survey. Automatica 38(2002):1633–1649

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Gerdes J, Kumar V (1995) An impact model of mechanical backlash for control system analysis. In: Proceedings of 1995 American control conference—ACC'95

  34. Nordin M, Galic J, Gutman P-O (1997) New models for backlash and gear play. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 11:49–63

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Gruzman M, Weber HI, Menegaldo LL (2010) Time domain simulation of a target tracking system with backlash compensation. MPE mathematical problems in engineering—special issue: models, methods and applications of dynamics in engineering sciences: state of the art, p 27

  36. Baek JH (2006) Modeling on a gimbal with antenna and investigation on the influence of backlash. JSME Int J Ser C Mech Syst Mach Elements Manuf 49(3):804–813

    Google Scholar 

  37. Baek JH, Kwak YK, Kim SH (2003) Backlash estimation of a seeker gimbal with two-stage gear. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:604–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu H, Cui LL, Shang DG, Xu YG (2017) Study on coupling effect between the time-varying gear backlash and the different time-varying mesh parameters on the gear system. J Vibroeng 19(8):5874–5891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Flores P, Lankarani HM (2017) Contact force models for multibody dynamics, vol 226. Springer, Switzerland, p 171

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber HI (2019) Raciocinando Dinâmica de Rotação. In: Oliveira JCF (ed) Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro: KDP—Kindle Direct Publishing—Amazon—Independently published, vol 1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Carlo Ferreira de Oliveira.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Marcelo Areias Trindade.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira, J.C.F., Weber, H.I. Orthodromic navigation through conic rotation driven by active universal joints with three degrees of freedom. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 495 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03799-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03799-y

Keywords

Navigation