Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The prediction of surface roughness and tool vibration by using metaheuristic-based ANFIS during dry turning of Al alloy (AA6013)

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the adaptive neuro-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model is developed to estimate the surface roughness (Ra) and tool vibrations (Acc) of AA6013 aluminum alloy during dry turning. Turning experiments were carried out with seven different cutting speeds, five different feed rates and seven different depth of cuts. These three different cutting parameters were tested with each other in different variations. ANFIS model is optimized using the genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and ant colony optimization. Performance of the developed model is compared with that of multi-linear regression model, which is one of the conventional prediction approaches. At the end of the study, it is revealed that the GA-ANFIS with an R-value of 0.946 is seen as the best model among the proposed approaches in the estimation of Acc. The PSO-ANFIS with an R-value of 0.916 is seen as the best model among the proposed approaches in the estimation of Ra. GA-ANFIS model for Acc prediction and PSO-ANFIS model for Ra prediction are the best approaches among the models discussed in the study. Moreover, the relationship between Acc and Ra values was examined and an empirical model was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbas A, Pimenov D, Erdakov I et al (2018) Artificial intelligence monitoring of hardening methods and cutting conditions and their effects on surface roughness, performance, and finish turning costs of solid-state recycled aluminum alloy 6061 chips. Metals 8:394. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8060394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aghdeab SH, Mohammed LA, Ubaid AM (2015) Optimization of CNC turning for aluminum alloy using simulated annealing method. Jordan J Mech Indust Eng 9:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birol Y, Gokcil E, Guvenc MA, Akdi S (2016) Processing of high strength EN AW 6082 forgings without a solution heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 674:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ubaid M, Bajaj D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Siddiquee AN (2019) Friction stir welding of thick AA2519 alloy: defect elimination, mechanical and micro-structural characterization. Met Mater Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00472-3

  5. Sahoo P, Pratap A, Bandyopadhyay A (2017) Modeling and optimization of surface roughness and tool vibration in CNC turning of aluminum alloy using hybrid RSM-WPCA methodology. Int J Ind Eng Comput 8:385–398. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arriaza OV, Tumurkhuyagc Z, Kim D-W (2018) Chatter identification using multiple sensors and multi-layer neural networks. Procedia Manuf 17:150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROMFG.2018.10.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guvenc MA, Huseyin Bilgic H, Mistikoglu S (2021) Identification of chatter vibrations and active vibration control by using the sliding mode controller on dry turning of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series, Mechanical Engineering, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Urbikain G, de Lacalle LNL (2018) Modelling of surface roughness in inclined milling operations with circle-segment end mills. Simul Model Pract Theory 84:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Munoa J, Beudaert X, Dombovari Z et al (2016) Chatter suppression techniques in metal cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:785–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dos Santos HFL, Trindade MA (2011) Structural vibration control using extension and shear active-passive piezoelectric networks including sensitivity to electrical uncertainties. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 33:287–301. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-58782011000300004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trindade MA (2007) Simultaneous extension and shear piezoelectric actuation for active vibration control of sandwich beams. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 18:591–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06076592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbas AT, Alata M, Ragab AE et al (2017) Prediction model of cutting parameters for turning high strength steel Grade-H: comparative study of regression model versus ANFIS. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2759020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DH, Kim TJY, Wang X et al (2018) Smart machining process using machine learning: a review and perspective on machining industry. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 5:555–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0057-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grzesik W (2017) Cutting vibrations. Adv Mach Process Metal Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63711-6.00008-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakinuma Y, Enomoto K, Hirano T, Ohnishi K (2014) Active chatter suppression in turning by band-limited force control. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:365–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia LA, Trindade MA (2019) Finite element modeling and parametric analysis of a dielectric elastomer thin-walled cylindrical actuator. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1527-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seyed Muhammad Hossein M, Younes MS, Vyacheslav L (2017) An evolutionary-based adaptive neuro-fuzzy expert system as a family counselor before marriage with the aim of divorce rate reduction. In: Conference: 2nd international conference on research knowledge base in computer engineering and IT 1–10

  18. Alajmi MS, Almeshal AM (2020) Prediction and optimization of surface roughness in a turning process using the ANFIS-QPSO method. Materials 13:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jain V, Raj T (2018) Prediction of cutting force by using ANFIS. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9:1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0717-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bilgic HH, Guvenc MA, Cakir M, Mistikoglu S (2019) A study on prediction of surface roughness and cutting tool temperature after turning for S235JR steel. Konya J Eng Sci 7:966–974. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.624725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohd Adnan MRH, Sarkheyli A, Mohd Zain A, Haron H (2013) Fuzzy logic for modeling machining process: a review. Artif Intell Rev 43:345–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9381-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srinivasa Pai P, D’Mello G (2015) Vibration signal analysis for monitoring tool wear in high speed turning of Ti-6Al-4V. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 22:652–660

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koyee RD, Heisel U, Eisseler R, Schmauder S (2014) Modeling and optimization of turning duplex stainless steels. J Manuf Process 16:451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Upase R, Ambhore N (2020) Experimental investigation of tool wear using vibration signals: an ANN approach. Mater Today: Proc 24:1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shivakoti I, Kibria G, Pradhan PM et al (2019) ANFIS based prediction and parametric analysis during turning operation of stainless steel 202. Mater Manuf Process 34:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.1512134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thamizhmanii S, Saparudin S, Hasan S (2007) Analyses of surface roughness by turning process using Taguchi method. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 20:503–505

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deshpande YV, Andhare AB, Padole PM (2019) Application of ANN to estimate surface roughness using cutting parameters, force, sound and vibration in turning of Inconel 718. SN Appl Sci 1:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-018-0098-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lmalghan R, Rao K, ArunKumar S et al (2018) Machining parameters optimization of AA6061 using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 19:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0083-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh D, Rao PV (2007) A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0429-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Güvenç MA, Çakır M, Mıstıkoğlu S (2019) Experimental study on optimization of cutting parameters by using taguchi method for tool vibration and surface roughness in dry turning of AA6013. In: Proceedings of 10th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing and service systems, pp 1032–1040

  31. Siddhpura M, Paurobally R (2012) A review of chatter vibration research in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 61:27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ambhore N, Kamble D, Chinchanikar S (2020) Evaluation of cutting tool vibration and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel: an experimental and ANN approach. J Vib Eng Technol 8:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00136-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhuiyan MSH, Choudhury IA (2015) Investigation of tool wear and surface finish by analyzing vibration signals in turning ASSAB-705 steel. Mach Sci Technol 19:236–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2015.1018531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Naresh C, Bose PSC, Suryaprakash Rao C, Selvaraj N (2020) Prediction of cutting force of AISI 304 stainless steel during laser-assisted turning process using ANFIS. Mater Today: Proc 38:2366–2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bilgic HH, Mert I (2021) Comparison of different techniques for estimation of incoming longwave radiation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18:601–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02923-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jang J (1991) Fuzzy modeling using generalized neural networks and kalman filter algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence 91:762–767

  37. Paul SK, Azeem A, Ghosh AK (2015) Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and artificial neural network in inventory level forecasting. Int J Bus Inform Syst 18:268–284. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2015.068164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fidanova S (2021) Ant colony optimization. Stud Comput Intell 947:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67380-2_2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Çakır M, Oral M, Aydın A (2011) Karınca Koloni Optimizasyon Algoritmaları ile Risk Faktörlerine Bağlı Optimum Hastane Yerleşim Noktasının Bulunması. Eng Sci 6:195–208. https://doi.org/10.12739/nwsaes.v6i1.5000067023

  40. Akdagli AA, Guney K, Karaboga D (2006) Touring ant colony optimization algorithm for shaped-beam pattern synthesis of linear antenna. Electromagnetics 26:615–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726340600978349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Eren B, Guvenc MA, Mistikoglu S (2020) Artificial intelligence applications for friction stir welding: a review. Met Mater Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00854-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wahid MA, Masood S, Khan ZA et al (2019) A simulation-based study on the effect of underwater friction stir welding process parameters using different evolutionary optimization algorithms. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 234:643–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219883904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) New optimizer using particle swarm theory. Proceedings of the international symposium on micro machine and human science. https://doi.org/10.1109/mhs.1995.494215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Panda A, Sahoo AK, Panigrahi I, Rout AK (2020) Prediction models for on-line cutting tool and machined surface condition monitoring during hard turning considering vibration signal. Mech Ind. https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2020067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Khademi F, Akbari M, Jamal SM, Nikoo M (2017) Multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic prediction of 28 days compressive strength of concrete. Front Struct Civ Eng 11:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0363-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sevim UK, Bilgic HH, Cansiz OF et al (2021) Compressive strength prediction models for cementitious composites with fly ash using machine learning techniques. Constr Build Mater 271:121584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang H, Hasanipanah M, Tahir MM, Bui DT (2020) Intelligent prediction of blasting-induced ground vibration using ANFIS optimized by GA and PSO. Nat Resour Res 29:739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09515-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mert İ, Bilgic HH, Yağlı H, Koç Y (2020) Deep neural network approach to estimation of power production for an organic Rankine cycle system. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02701-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Chapra SC, Canale RP (2011) Numerical methods for engineers, vol 2. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Iskenderun Technical University scope of PhD Thesis of Mehmet Ali GUVENC. We would like to thank Iskenderun Technical University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, for their support. Finally, we would like to thank Konya Technical University and Prof. Dr. Mete Kalyoncu for allowing us to use the laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iskenderun Technical University, 31200, Iskenderun, Hatay, Turkey

    Mehmet Ali Guvenc, Mustafa Cakir & Selcuk Mistikoglu

  2. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42000, Meram, Konya, Turkey

    Hasan Huseyin Bilgic

Authors
  1. Mehmet Ali Guvenc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hasan Huseyin Bilgic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mustafa Cakir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Selcuk Mistikoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selcuk Mistikoglu.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Marcelo Areias Trindade.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guvenc, M.A., Bilgic, H.H., Cakir, M. et al. The prediction of surface roughness and tool vibration by using metaheuristic-based ANFIS during dry turning of Al alloy (AA6013). J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 474 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03798-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03798-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation