Skip to main content
Log in

Influence analysis of key design parameters on the roller safety factor of three-row and four-column roller slewing bearings based on analytical method and FEM

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three-row and four-column slewing bearing is used as the slewing guarantee for large equipment, such as TBM. This particular structure provides an improvement in the bearing capacity, meanwhile, it also has different behaviors compared to conventional roller slewing bearing. In order to pay attention to different roller design parameters and axial clearance for the effect on its roller safety factor, specific analysis tools must be developed. First, this paper presents a set of load distribution and contact stress analytical method based on the actual contact behavior, and FEM is used to assure its reliability. Secondly, the influence of different roller crownings on the generatrix contact stress is analyzed by using the proposed method, and the optimization algorithms get involved in improving the roller crowning and reduce the max contact stress by about 5%. Finally, taking the roller safety factor as the evaluation index, the orthogonal experiment is carried out with 6 key design parameters, and their influence characteristics and priorities are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krynke M, Kania L, Mazanek E (2012) Modelling the contact between the rolling elements and the raceways of bulky slewing bearings//key engineering materials. Trans Tech Publ Ltd 490:166–178. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.490.166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kania L, Krynke M, Mazanek E (2012) A catalogue capacity of slewing bearings. Mech Mach Theory 58:29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Szczepan Ś (2016) Methodology for calculating the complete static carrying capacity of twin slewing bearing. Mech Mach Theory 101:181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He P, Yun W, Hua W (2021) An analysis method of carrying capacity accuracy of three-row roller slewing bearing. Mechanics 27(5):360–367. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.28111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Göncz P, Potočnik R, Glodež S (2013) Computational model for determination of static load capacity of three-row roller slewing bearings with arbitrary clearances and predefined raceway deformations. Int J Mech Sci 73(4):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin I, Aguirrebeitia J, Heras I et al (2021) Efficient finite element modelling of crossed roller wire race slewing bearings. Tribol Int 161:107098–107098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Göncz P, Ulbin M, Glodež S (2015) Computational assessment of the allowable static contact loading of a roller-slewing bearing׳ s case-hardened raceway. Int J Mech Sci 94:174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hongbiao H, Jianzheng Li, Hongbin L (2010) FEA analysis of the shield machine main bearing under radial force. Int Conf Adv Technol Des Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2010.1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Göncz P, Glodež S (2013) Static capacity of a large double row slewing ball bearing with predefined irregular geometry. Mech Mach Theory 64:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krynke M (2019) Modelling of roller-raceway contacts in the slewing bearing taking into account asymmetrical load transfer through a roller. Manuf Technol 19(6):979–983

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kania L (2006) Modelling of rollers in calculation of slewing bearing with the use of finite elements. Mech Mach Theory 41(11):1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2005.12.007

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Peiyu He, Rong L, Rongjing H et al (2018) Hardened raceway calculation analysis of a three-row roller slewing bearing. Int J Mech Sci 137:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hua W, Peiyu He, Bitao P et al (2017) A new computational model of large three-row roller slewing bearings using nonlinear springs. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 231(20):3831–3839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406217704223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alain D, Chaib Z, Ghosn A (2008) 3D simplified finite elements analysis of load and contact angle in a slewing ball bearing. J Mech Des 130(8):082601. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2918915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wen Q, Qungui D, Zhai X (2019) An analytical method for calculating the tooth surface contact stress of spur gears with tip relief. Int J Mech Sci 151:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu B, Bruni S (2022) Comparison of wheel–rail contact models in the context of multibody system simulation Hertzian versus non-Hertzian. Veh Syst Dyn 60(3):1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2020.1847297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang Wei Xu, Hua ZX et al (2020) Impact of journal bending on the failure of axle bearings in railroad passenger cars. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J Eng Tribol 234(8):1296–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650119866040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuanfeng X, Jian P, Liang Y et al (2021) Investigation on clearance-induced vibro-impacts of torsional system based on Hertz contact nonlinearity. Mech Mach Theory 162:104342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Potočnik R, Göncz P, Srečko G (2013) Static capacity of a large double row slewing ball bearing with predefined irregular geometry. Mech Mach Theory 64:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aguirrebeitia J, Abasolo M, Avilés R et al (2012) Theoretical calculation of general static load-carrying capacity for the design and selection of three row roller slewing bearings. Mech Mach Theory 48:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haisheng Y, Guoding C, Sier D, et al (2011) Analysis of the roller-race contact deformation of cylindrical roller bering using a improved slice method 2011> In: International conference on mechatronic science, electric engineering and computer (MEC), IEEE, pp 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEC.2011.6025564

  22. Love AEH (1944) A treatise of the mathematical theory of elaslicify, 4th edn. Dover Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmadi N, Keer LM, Mura T (1983) Non-Hertzian contact stress analysis for an elastic half space—normal and sliding contact. Int J Solids Str 19(4):357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(83)90032-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Liangyong L, Chaoyang S, Yanbin Z (2015) Comparison of contact stress distribution for roller with different correction generatrix. J Harbin Bear 36(1):6–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tao Z, XueBing Y, Zhong H et al (2021) Research on the design method of roller modification curve for wind turbine. J Mech Strength 43(1):183–190 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spiridon C (2017) Design algorithm for generatrix profile of cylindrical crowned rollers. MATEC Web Conf EDP Sci 112:07017. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711207017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jeremy B (2018) Advances in the simulation of viscoplastic fluid flows using interior-point methods. Computer Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:368–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Byrd Richard H, Hribar ME, Nocedal J (1999) An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. SIAM J Optim 9(4):877–900. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623497325107

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yunfeng L (2016) Effects of design parameters on carrying capacity of a double-row tapered roller slewing bearing used in wind turbine. Adv Mech Eng 8(7):1687814016658389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016658389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Load Ratings and Fatigue Life for Roller Bearings. ABMA11-2014 (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project supported by Special funding support for the construction of innovative provinces in Hunan Province (Grant No. 2019GK1016),the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (Grant No. 2021zzts0132) and the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate (Grant No. CX20210208).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihong Xiong.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Zilda de Castro Silveira.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Zhang, T., Xiong, Z. et al. Influence analysis of key design parameters on the roller safety factor of three-row and four-column roller slewing bearings based on analytical method and FEM. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 488 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03794-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03794-3

Keywords

Navigation