Skip to main content
Log in

An object detection network for wear debris recognition in ferrography images

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intelligent recognition of wear debris in ferrography images is a great challenge. Aiming at the detection characteristics of multi-scale objects, small objects and overlapping objects in ferrography images, a real-time on-line object detection model combining feature fusion, self-attention mechanism and improved NMS is proposed. Based on YOLOv3, a fully convolutional network based on feature fusion is constructed, and a residual unit with self-attention mechanism and an object selection mechanism based on improved non-maximum suppression are introduced. The performance of the model is compared with three advanced object detection algorithms on a great number of ferrography images. The experimental results show that the model has high detection accuracy, short detection time and strong adaptability. The proposed model can be further developed and applied to fault diagnosis and condition monitoring of machinery and equipment in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jardine AK, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stachowiak GP, Stachowiak GW, Podsiadlo P (2008) Automated classification of wear particles based on their surface texture and shape features. Tribol Int 41(1):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar M, Mukherjee PS, Misra NM (2013) Advancement and current status of wear debris analysis for machine condition monitoring: a review. Ind Lubricat Tribol 65(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raadnui S (2005) Wear particle analysis—utilization of quantitative computer image analysis: a review. Tribol Int 38(10):871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Pham H (2005) An inspection-maintenance model for systems with multiple competing processes. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(2):318–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kowandy C, Richard C, Chen YM, Tessier JJ (2007) Correlation between the tribological behaviour and wear particle morphology—case of grey cast iron 250 versus Graphite and PTFE. Wear 262(7):996–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Upadhyay RK (2013) Microscopic technique to determine various wear modes of used engine oil. J Microsc Ultrastruct 1(3):111–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebersbach S, Peng Z, Kessissoglou N (2006) The investigation of the condition and faults of a spur gearbox using vibration and wear debris analysis techniques. Wear 260(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roylance BJ (2005) Ferrography—then and now. Tribol Int 38(10):857–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao W, Dong G, Xie YB, Peng Z (2018) Prediction of wear trend of engines via on-line wear debris monitoring. Tribol Int 120:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng S, Zeng Q, Fan B, Luo J, Xiao H, Mao J (2021) Wear debris segmentation of reflection ferrograms using lightweight residual U-Net. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roylance BJ, Albidewi IA, Laghari MS (1994) Computer-aided vision engineering (CAVE)-quantification of wear particle morphology. Lubricat Eng 50(2):111–116

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peng Z, Kirk TB (1999) Wear particle classification in a fuzzy grey system. Wear 225:1238–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng Z, Goodwin S (2001) Wear-debris analysis in expert systems. Tribol Lett 11(3–4):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Yao P, Liu W, Wang X (2016) A hybrid method for the segmentation of a ferrograph image using marker-controlled watershed and grey clustering. Tribol Trans 59(3):513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu H, Wu T, Peng Y, Peng Z (2014) Watershed-based morphological separation of wear debris chains for on-line ferrograph analysis. Tribol Lett 53(2):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Q, Zhao T, Zhang L, Sun W, Zhao X (2017) Ferrography wear particles image recognition based on extreme learning machine. J Electric Comput Eng 2017:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang S, Wu T, Wang K, Sarkodie-Gyan T (2020) Ferrograph analysis with improved particle segmentation and classification methods. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 20(2):021001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng Y, Wu T, Cao G, Huang S, Wu H, Kwok N, Peng Z (2017) A hybrid search-tree discriminant technique for multivariate wear debris classification. Wear 392:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu T, Peng Y, Wang S, Chen F, Kwok N, Peng Z (2017) Morphological feature extraction based on multiview images for wear debris analysis in on-line fluid monitoring. Tribol Trans 60(3):408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang S, Wu T, Yang L, Kwok N, Sarkodie-Gyan T (2019) Three-dimensional reconstruction of wear particle surface based on photometric stereo. Measurement 133:350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng P, Wang J (2019) FECNN: a promising model for wear particle recognition. Wear 432: 202968

  23. Peng P, Wang J (2019) Wear particle classification considering particle overlapping. Wear 422:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fan S, Zhang T, Guo X, Wulamu A (2021) FFWR-Net: a feature fusion wear particle recognition network for wear particle classification. J Mech Sci Technol 35(4):1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng Y, Cai J, Wu T, Cao G, Kwok N, Zhou S, Peng Z (2019) A hybrid convolutional neural network for intelligent wear particle classification. Tribol Int 138:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng Y, Cai J, Wu T, Cao G, Kwok N, Peng Z (2020) WP-DRnet: a novel wear particle detection and recognition network for automatic ferrograph image analysis. Tribol Int 151:106379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J (2016) Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(6):1137–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Szegedy C, Reed S, Fu CY, Berg AC (2016) Ssd: single shot multibox detector. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, pp 21–37

  29. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A (2016) You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 779–788

  30. Redmon J, Farhadi A (2017) YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7263–7271

  31. Redmon J, Farhadi A (2018) Yolov3: an incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1804.02767

  32. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1502.03167.

  33. Wang SH, Phillips P, Sui Y, Liu B, Yang M, Cheng H (2018) Classification of Alzheimer’s disease based on eight-layer convolutional neural network with leaky rectified linear unit and max pooling. J Med Syst 42(5):85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 5998–6008

  35. Woo S, Park J, Lee JY, So Kweon I (2018) Cbam: convolutional block attention module. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp 3–19

  36. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G (2018) Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7132–7141

  37. Gregor K, Danihelka I, Graves A, Rezende DJ, Wierstra D (2015) Draw: a recurrent neural network for image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1502.04623.

  38. Neubeck A, Van Gool L (2006) Efficient non-maximum suppression. In: 18th International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR'06). IEEE, vol 3, pp 850–855

  39. He Y, Zhang X, Savvides M, Kitani K (2018) Softer-nms: rethinking bounding box regression for accurate object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1809.08545, 2, 3.

  40. Roylance BJ, Williams JA, Dwyer-Joyce R (2000) Wear debris and associated wear phenomena—fundamental research and practice. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 214(1):79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weiss K, Khoshgoftaar TM, Wang D (2016) A survey of transfer learning. J Big Data 3(1):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the key research and development plan of Shandong province (2018GGX105002) and the key research and development plan of Shandong province (2019JZZY020712).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengguang Jia.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Celso Kazuyuki Morooka.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, F., Wei, H., Sun, H. et al. An object detection network for wear debris recognition in ferrography images. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03375-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03375-4

Keywords

Navigation