Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tribological characteristics and drilling performance of nano-MoS2-enhanced vegetable oil-based cutting fluid using eco-friendly MQL technique in drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel

Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering volume 43, Article number: 189 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

The implementation of sustainable manufacturing techniques to make machining operations more eco-friendly is a demanding issue that has gained attention from academic and industrial sectors. In some machining operations, a large quantity of machining fluids is wasted to make machining easier, especially during the machining of difficult-to-machine materials such as stainless steel. In such circumstances, many researchers are investigating eco-friendly techniques. Therefore, in this study, effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) with MoS2-enhanced vegetable-oil-based cutting fluid on the drilling characteristics of AISI 321 stainless steel are investigated. The main aim of this study is to analyse the machining performance of various coolant–lubricant strategies, namely dry, flood, pure MQL, and three nanofluid MQL (NFMQL) with regard to thrust force and torque, surface roughness, friction coefficient, chip morphology and tool wear mechanism in drilling of stainless steel (AISI 321). Research findings indicated that NFMQL drilling conditions have given excellent drilling performance by improving drilling characteristics than pure MQL, dry and flood drilling. Among the NFMQL drilling conditions, 1.5 wt.% nano-MoS2 in sunflower oil-based MQL condition provided better cooling–lubrication effect and improved the drilling characteristics followed by 1.0 wt.% and 0.5 wt.% nano-MoS2 in sunflower oil-based MQL conditions. The 1.5 wt.% nano-MoS2 in sunflower oil-based MQL drilling had resulted in 43.2%, 68.9%, 56.8% and 41.6% reduced values of thrust force, torque, surface roughness and COF, respectively, at the 30th hole in comparison with flood drilling. Moreover, noticeable improvement in the chip morphology and tool wear rate has been achieved while drilling under NFMQL environments. The better drilling performance of nanofluid MQL may be attributed to the fact that nanoparticles (MoS2) in sunflower oil offer excellent cooling–lubrication features and provide strength to the oil film at the tool–workpiece interface. In addition, nano-MoS2 particles have high surface activity and are easily adsorbed onto the contacting surfaces, thereby maintaining the lubrication effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. Reddy NSK, Nouari M, Yang M (2010) Development of electrostatic solid lubrication system for improvement in machining process performance. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(9):789–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod 83:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tönshoff H, Brinksmeier E (1980) Determination of the mechanical and thermal influences on machined surfaces by microhardness and residual stress analysis. CIRP Ann 29(2):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dhar N, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172(2):299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sartori S, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2018) Solid lubricant-assisted minimum quantity lubrication and cooling strategies to improve Ti6Al4V machinability in finishing turning. Tribol Int 118:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinksmeier E, Meyer D, Huesmann-Cordes A, Herrmann C (2015) Metalworking fluids—mechanisms and performance. CIRP Ann 64(2):605–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixit US, Sarma D, Davim JP (2012) Environmentally friendly machining. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Lal Virdi R, Singh Chatha S, Singh H (2020) Performance evaluation of Inconel 718 under vegetable oils based nanofluids using minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gajrani KK, Ram D, Ravi Sankar M (2017) Biodegradation and hard machining performance comparison of eco-friendly cutting fluid and mineral oil using flood cooling and minimum quantity cutting fluid techniques. J Clean Prod 165:1420–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leppert T (2011) Effect of cooling and lubrication conditions on surface topography and turning process of C45 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(2):120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diniz AE, de Oliveira AJ (2004) Optimizing the use of dry cutting in rough turning steel operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(10):1061–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sreejith P, Ngoi B (2000) Dry machining: machining of the future. J Mater Process Technol 101(1–3):287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tazehkandi AH, Pilehvarian F, Davoodi B (2014) Experimental investigation on removing cutting fluid from turning of Inconel 725 with coated carbide tools. J Clean Prod 80:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davoodi B, Tazehkandi AH (2014) Experimental investigation and optimization of cutting parameters in dry and wet machining of aluminum alloy 5083 in order to remove cutting fluid. J Clean Prod 68:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan M, Dhar N (2006) Performance evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication by vegetable oil in terms of cutting force, cutting zone temperature, tool wear, job dimension and surface finish in turning AISI-1060 steel. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 7(11):1790–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li K-M, Chou S-Y (2010) Experimental evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication in near micro-milling. J Mater Process Technol 210(15):2163–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vazquez E, Gomar J, Ciurana J, Rodríguez CA (2015) Analyzing effects of cooling and lubrication conditions in micromilling of Ti6Al4V. J Clean Prod 87:906–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chinchanikar S, Choudhury S (2014) Hard turning using HiPIMS-coated carbide tools: wear behavior under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Measurement 55:536–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Priarone PC, Robiglio M, Settineri L, Tebaldo V (2014) Milling and turning of titanium aluminides by using minimum quantity lubrication. Procedia CIRP 24:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meena A, El Mansori M (2011) Study of dry and minimum quantity lubrication drilling of novel austempered ductile iron (ADI) for automotive applications. Wear 271(9–10):2412–2416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2013) A critical assessment of lubrication techniques in machining processes: a case for minimum quantity lubrication using vegetable oil-based lubricant. J Clean Prod 41:210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gajrani KK, Sankar MR (2017) Past and current status of eco-friendly vegetable oil based metal cutting fluids. Mater Today Proc 4(2):3786–3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Silva LR, Corrêa EC, Brandão JR, de Ávila RF (2020) Environmentally friendly manufacturing: behavior analysis of minimum quantity of lubricant-MQL in grinding process. J Clean Prod 256:103287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tawakoli T, Hadad M, Sadeghi M, Daneshi A, Stöckert S, Rasifard A (2009) An experimental investigation of the effects of workpiece and grinding parameters on minimum quantity lubrication—MQL grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(12–13):924–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Yang M, Zhang N, Wu Q, Han Z, Sun K (2017) Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil. J Clean Prod 154:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang J, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Jia D, Liu G, Hou Y, Li R, Zhang N, Wu Q (2018) Experimental assessment of an environmentally friendly grinding process using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication with cryogenic air. J Clean Prod 193:236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nam JS, Lee P-H, Lee SW (2011) Experimental characterization of micro-drilling process using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(7–8):649–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chatha SS, Pal A, Singh T (2016) Performance evaluation of aluminium 6063 drilling under the influence of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 137:537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee P-H, Nam TS, Li C, Lee SW (2010) Environmentally-friendly nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) meso-scale grinding process using nano-diamond particles. In: 2010 international conference on manufacturing automation. IEEE, pp 44–49

  30. Mao C, Tang X, Zou H, Huang X, Zhou Z (2012) Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(10):1745–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Su Y, Gong L, Li B, Liu Z, Chen D (2016) Performance evaluation of nanofluid MQL with vegetable-based oil and ester oil as base fluids in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):2083–2089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang H, Zhou S, Chen C (2012) Experimental study on the tribological properties of WS2 and MoS2 nano-particles as lubricating oil additives. Pet Process Petrochem 43(9):71–75

    Google Scholar 

  33. Borade S, Kadam M (2016) Comparison of main effect of vegetable oil and Al2O3 nanofluids used with MQL on surface roughness and temperature. Int J Mech Eng Technol 7(1):203–213

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sayuti M, Erh OM, Sarhan AAD, Hamdi M (2014) Investigation on the morphology of the machined surface in end milling of aerospace AL6061-T6 for novel uses of SiO2 nanolubrication system. J Clean Prod 66:655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang B-S, Xu B-S, Xu Y, Gao F, Shi P-J, Wu Y-X (2011) Cu nanoparticles effect on the tribological properties of hydrosilicate powders as lubricant additive for steel–steel contacts. Tribol Int 44(7–8):878–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Minh DT, The LT, Bao NT (2017) Performance of Al2O3 nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication in hard milling of 60Si2Mn steel using cemented carbide tools. Adv Mech Eng 9(7):1687814017710618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Emami M, Sadeghi MH, Sarhan AAD (2013) Investigating the effects of liquid atomization and delivery parameters of minimum quantity lubrication on the grinding process of Al2O3 engineering ceramics. J Manuf Process 15(3):374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu X, Lv T, Luan Z, Zhao Y, Wang M, Hu X (2019) Capillary penetration mechanism and oil mist concentration of Al2O3 nanoparticle fluids in electrostatic minimum quantity lubrication (EMQL) milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5–8):1937–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y, Li C, Yang M, Jia D, Wang Y, Li B, Hou Y, Zhang N, Wu Q (2016) Experimental evaluation of cooling performance by friction coefficient and specific friction energy in nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication grinding with different types of vegetable oil. J Clean Prod 139:685–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Davis B, Schueller JK, Huang Y (2015) Study of ionic liquid as effective additive for minimum quantity lubrication during titanium machining. Manuf Lett 5:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2015.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Geng D, Lu Z, Yao G, Liu J, Li Z, Zhang D (2017) Cutting temperature and resulting influence on machining performance in rotary ultrasonic elliptical machining of thick CFRP. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 123:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chetan GS, Venkateswara Rao P (2015) Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review. J Clean Prod 100:17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Najiha MS, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K (2016) Performance of water-based TiO2 nanofluid during the minimum quantity lubrication machining of aluminium alloy, AA6061-T6. J Clean Prod 135:1623–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nam J, Kim JW, Kim JS, Lee J, Lee SW (2018) Parametric analysis and optimization of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication micro-drilling process for titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) using response surface methodology and desirability function. Procedia Manuf 26:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Khanna N, Agrawal C, Gupta MK, Song Q (2020) Tool wear and hole quality evaluation in cryogenic drilling of Inconel 718 superalloy. Tribol Int 143:106084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Uçak N, Çiçek A (2018) The effects of cutting conditions on cutting temperature and hole quality in drilling of Inconel 718 using solid carbide drills. J Manuf Process 31:662–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Percin M, Aslantas K, Ucun I, Kaynak Y, Cicek A (2016) Micro-drilling of Ti–6Al–4V alloy: the effects of cooling/lubricating. Precis Eng 45:450–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Niketh S, Samuel G (2018) Drilling performance of micro textured tools under dry, wet and MQL condition. J Manuf Process 32:254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST, Asrai RI (2012) An initial study of the effect of using liquid nitrogen coolant on the surface roughness of Inconel 718 nickel-based

  50. Barczak LM, Batako ADL, Morgan MN (2010) A study of plane surface grinding under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(11):977–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Guo S, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li B, Yang M, Zhang X, Liu G (2017) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance of mixtures of castor oil with other vegetable oils in MQL grinding of nickel-based alloy. J Clean Prod 140:1060–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Qu S, Gong Y, Yang Y, Wang W, Liang C, Han B (2020) An investigation of carbon nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication for grinding unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced ceramic matrix composites. J Clean Prod 249:119353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sai SS, ManojKumar K, Ghosh A (2015) Assessment of spray quality from an external mix nozzle and its impact on SQL grinding performance. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sinha MK, Madarkar R, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) Application of eco-friendly nanofluids during grinding of Inconel 718 through small quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 141:1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pashmforoush F, Bagherinia RD (2018) Influence of water-based copper nanofluid on wheel loading and surface roughness during grinding of Inconel 738 superalloy. J Clean Prod 178:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pal A, Chatha SS, Sidhu HS (2020) Experimental investigation on the performance of MQL drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel using nano-graphene enhanced vegetable-oil-based cutting fluid. Tribol Int 106508

  57. Öndin O, Kıvak T, Sarıkaya M, Yıldırım ÇV (2020) Investigation of the influence of MWCNTs mixed nanofluid on the machinability characteristics of PH 13-8 Mo stainless steel. Tribol Int 106323

  58. Molaie MM, Akbari J, Movahhedy MR (2016) Ultrasonic assisted grinding process with minimum quantity lubrication using oil-based nanofluids. J Clean Prod 129:212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sarıkaya M, Güllü A (2015) Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to-cut alloy Haynes 25. J Clean Prod 91:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang Y, Wan Z, Lu L, Zhang Z, Tang Y (2018) Friction and wear mechanisms of castor oil with addition of hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles. Tribol Int 124:10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhao J, He Y, Wang Y, Wang W, Yan L, Luo J (2016) An investigation on the tribological properties of multilayer graphene and MoS2 nanosheets as additives used in hydraulic applications. Tribol Int 97:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nunn N, Mahbooba Z, Ivanov M, Ivanov D, Brenner D, Shenderova O (2015) Tribological properties of polyalphaolefin oil modified with nanocarbon additives. Diam Relat Mater 54:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rapoport L, Leshchinsky V, Lapsker I, Volovik Y, Nepomnyashchy O, Lvovsky M, Popovitz-Biro R, Feldman Y, Tenne R (2003) Tribological properties of WS2 nanoparticles under mixed lubrication. Wear 255(7–12):785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Alves S, Barros B, Trajano M, Ribeiro K, Moura E (2013) Tribological behavior of vegetable oil-based lubricants with nanoparticles of oxides in boundary lubrication conditions. Tribol Int 65:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ghaednia H, Hossain MS, Jackson RL (2016) Tribological performance of silver nanoparticle–enhanced polyethylene glycol lubricants. Tribol Trans 59(4):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zulkifli N, Kalam M, Masjuki H, Yunus R (2013) Experimental analysis of tribological properties of biolubricant with nanoparticle additive. Procedia Eng 68:152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Parás LP, Cortés DM, Taha-Tijerina J (2019) Eco-friendly nanoparticle additives for lubricants and their tribological characterization. In: Handbook of ecomaterials. Springer, pp 3247–3267

  68. Chou R, Battez AH, Cabello J, Viesca J, Osorio A, Sagastume A (2010) Tribological behavior of polyalphaolefin with the addition of nickel nanoparticles. Tribol Int 43(12):2327–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mane SA, Karagadde S, Joshi SS (2019) Characterisation of friction at the tool–chip interface for orthogonal cutting of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Adv Mater Process Technol 5(2):191–201

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lorain R, Olivier L, Poggi A, Valiorgue F, Rech J (2019) Identification of friction coefficients when drilling titanium TiAl6V4. Procedia CIRP 82:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tunc LT, Gu Y, Burke MG (2016) Effects of minimal quantity lubrication (MQL) on surface integrity in robotic milling of austenitic stainless steel. Procedia CIRP 45:215–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Duan Z, Yin Q, Li C, Dong L, Bai X, Zhang Y, Yang M, Jia D, Li R, Liu Z (2020) Milling force and surface morphology of 45 steel under different Al2O3 nanofluid concentrations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–20

  73. Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Zhang D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental evaluation of MoS2 nanoparticles in jet MQL grinding with different types of vegetable oil as base oil. J Clean Prod 87:930–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sahoo AK, Sahoo B (2012) Experimental investigations on machinability aspects in finish hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using uncoated and multilayer coated carbide inserts. Measurement 45(8):2153–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Dhale K, Banerjee N, Singh RK, Outeiro JC (2019) Investigation on chip formation and surface morphology in orthogonal machining of Zr-based bulk metallic glass. Manuf Lett 19:25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Shokoohi Y, Khosrojerdi E, Shiadhi BR (2015) Machining and ecological effects of a new developed cutting fluid in combination with different cooling techniques on turning operation. J Clean Prod 94:330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ravi S, Kumar MP (2011) Experimental investigations on cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen in the end milling of hardened steel. Cryogenics 51(9):509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Babu MN, Anandan V, Muthukrishnan N, Santhanakumar M (2019) End milling of AISI 304 steel using minimum quantity lubrication. Measurement 138:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Jia D, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Wang Y, Guo S, Cao H (2017) Specific energy and surface roughness of minimum quantity lubrication grinding Ni-based alloy with mixed vegetable oil-based nanofluids. Precis Eng 50:248–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Li M, Yu T, Zhang R, Yang L, Ma Z, Li B, Wang X, Wang W, Zhao J (2019) Experimental evaluation of an eco-friendly grinding process combining minimum quantity lubrication and graphene-enhanced plant-oil-based cutting fluid. J Clean Prod 118747

  81. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang M, Zhang X, Guo S, Liu G (2016) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication properties of the wheel/workpiece interface in MQL grinding with different nanofluids. Tribol Int 99:198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Astakhov VP (2004) The assessment of cutting tool wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(6):637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Bhowmick S, Lukitsch MJ, Alpas AT (2010) Dry and minimum quantity lubrication drilling of cast magnesium alloy (AM60). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(5):444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Pal A, Chatha SS, Singh K (2020) Performance evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication technique in grinding of AISI 202 stainless steel using nano-MoS2 with vegetable-based cutting fluid. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05840-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sen B, Mia M, Mandal UK, Mondal SP (2020) Synergistic effect of silica and pure palm oil on the machining performances of Inconel 690: a study for promoting minimum quantity nano doped-green lubricants. J Clean Prod 120755

  86. Shen B, Malshe AP, Kalita P, Shih AJ (2008) Performance of novel MoS2 nanoparticles based grinding fluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Trans Namri/SME 36(1):357–364

    Google Scholar 

  87. Hu KH, Hu XG, Xu YF, Huang F, Liu JS (2010) The effect of morphology on the tribological properties of MoS2 in liquid paraffin. Tribol Lett 40(1):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang Q, Li C, Wang S (2013) Analysis of cooling characteristic for minimum quantity lubrication with nanoparticles. Manuf Tech Mac Tool 3:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  89. Choi C, Jung M, Choi Y, Lee J, Oh J (2011) Tribological properties of lubricating oil-based nanofluids with metal/carbon nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(1):368–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Şirin Ş, Kıvak T (2019) Performances of different eco-friendly nanofluid lubricants in the milling of Inconel X-750 superalloy. Tribol Int 137:180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Yang M, Jia D, Zhang N, Wu Q (2017) Effect of the physical properties of different vegetable oil-based nanofluids on MQLC grinding temperature of Ni-based alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):3459–3474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Lv T, Huang S, Liu E, Ma Y, Xu X (2018) Tribological and machining characteristics of an electrostatic minimum quantity lubrication (EMQL) technology using graphene nano-lubricants as cutting fluids. J Manuf Process 34:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GZS Campus College of Engineering and Technology, Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India

    Amrit Pal

  2. Yadavindra College of Engineering,, Punjabi University Guru Kashi Campus, Talwandi Sabo, Punjab, 151302, India

    Sukhpal Singh Chatha & Hazoor Singh Sidhu

Authors
  1. Amrit Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sukhpal Singh Chatha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hazoor Singh Sidhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrit Pal.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Fagali de Souza.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, A., Chatha, S.S. & Sidhu, H.S. Tribological characteristics and drilling performance of nano-MoS2-enhanced vegetable oil-based cutting fluid using eco-friendly MQL technique in drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02899-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02899-5

Keywords

search

Navigation