Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of different machining parameters on surface roughness of aluminium alloys based on Si and Mg content

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminium-based alloys are considered lengthily for many applications in engineering areas due to their good mechanical properties. Machining these alloys had attracted the attention of many researchers on how to improve the machining, especially when high manufacturing rate is demanded. Usually, machining these materials poses some difficulties such as burr formation, roughness of the surface, continuous chip formation and build-up edge on cutting edge. In this study, AA6061T6, LM6 and AA5083 aluminium-based alloys were considered to research the optimum drilling parameters with the aim to address the earlier started challenges. Drillings were carried out by using a MAHO three-axis CNC drilling machine with an HSS drilling bit at three different spindle speeds and feed rates. From the results, it was established that each aluminium alloy has different surface roughnesses and this surface roughness decreases as spindle speeds increased. A minimum build-up edge was achieved for AA5083 and AA6061T6 alloys. However, a relatively high BUE was noticed in LM6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madhu Kumar Y, Shankar U (2012) Evaluation of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy 6061-glass particulates reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Mod Eng Res (IJMER) 2(5):3207–3209

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olohunde ST, Hafizi AM, Jamaliah I, Al-Bakoosh AA, Segun OO, Sadiq IO (2019) Corrosion resistance of aluminium-silicon hypereutectic alloy from scrap metal. J Bio Tribo Corros 5(2):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gale WF, Totemeier TC (2003) Smithells metals reference book. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demir H, Gündüz S (2009) The effects of aging on machinability of 6061 aluminium alloy. Mater Des 30(5):1480–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao CP, Bhagyashekar M, Viswanath N (2014) Machining behavior of Al6061-fly ash composites. Procedia Mater Sci 5:1593–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajakumar S, Muralidharan C, Balasubramanian V (2010) Establishing empirical relationships to predict grain size and tensile strength of friction stir welded AA 6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 20(10):1863–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou C, Yang X, Luan G (2005) Fatigue properties of friction stir welds in Al 5083 alloy. Scr Mater 53(10):1187–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotoh K, Murakami K, Noda Y (2011) Fatigue crack growth behaviour of A5083 series aluminium alloys and their welded joints. J Mar Sci Technol 16(3):343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sulaiman S, Sayuti M, Samin R (2008) Mechanical properties of the as-cast quartz particulate reinforced LM6 alloy matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 201(1–3):731–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu C, Jiang Q, Yang Y, Wang H, Wang J (2006) Effect of Nd on primary silicon and eutectic silicon in hypereutectic Al–Si alloy. J Alloys Compd 422(1):L1–L4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramulu M, Rao P, Kao H (2002) Drilling of (Al2O3) p/6061 metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 124(1):244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadiq TO, Daud LM, Idris J (2018) Investigation of microstructure and mechanical properties of A335 P11 main steam pipe in Stesen Janaelektrik Jambatan Connaught Power Plant, Malaysia. Trans Indian Inst Met 71(10):2527–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buha J, Lumley R, Crosky A, Hono K (2007) Secondary precipitation in an Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy. Acta Mater 55(9):3015–3024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pengfei X, Bo G, Zhuang Y, Kaihua L, Ganfeng T (2010) Effect of erbium on properties and microstructure of Al–Si eutectic alloy. J Rare Earths 28(6):927–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pezda J (2014) The effect of the T6 heat treatment on hardness and microstructure of the EN AC-AlSi12CuNiMg alloy. Metalurgija 53(1):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  16. Behera R, Sutradhar G (2012) Machinability of LM6/SICP metal matrix composites with tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 7(2):216–221

    Google Scholar 

  17. Senapati AK, Brata Mohanty S (2014) A review on the effect of process parameters on different output parameters during machining of several materials. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol 3(3):1499–1508

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sadiq TO, Olawore SA, Idris J (2018) Energy consideration in machining titanium alloys with a low carbon manufacturing requirements: a critical review. Int J Eng Res Afr 35:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barani A, Amini S, Paktinat H, Tehrani AF (2014) Built-up edge investigation in vibration drilling of Al 2024-T6. Ultrasonics 54(5):1300–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Songmene V, Djebara A, Zaghbani I, Kouam J, Khettabi R (2011) Machining and machinability of aluminum alloys. In: Kvackaj T (ed) Aluminium alloys, theory and applications. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/14888

  21. Dwivedi D, Sharma A, Rajan T (2008) Machining of LM13 and LM28 cast aluminium alloys: part I. J Mater Process Technol 196(1):197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taskesen A, Kutukde K (2013) Analysis and optimization of drilling parameters for tool wear and hole dimensional accuracy in B4C reinforced Al-alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23(9):2524–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The staff members in the Department of Materials, Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia are sincerely appreciated for their financial and technical support during and after this work. This work was partially supported by the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia (MOHE), Research Management Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, through GUP No: 20H28 and 06G32.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamaliah Idris.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Fagali de Souza.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadiq, T.O., Hameed, B.A., Idris, J. et al. Effect of different machining parameters on surface roughness of aluminium alloys based on Si and Mg content. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 451 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1948-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1948-8

Keywords

Navigation