Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative performance analysis of micro-structured carbide inserts in machining of EN19 alloy steel

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface structuring has been long existed to improve the tribological application. Recently, it has been applied to the cutting tools and has shown the promising results. However, no study has been yet conducted that identified the suitable shape of structures that can be meritoriously applied to the cutting tool. In this study, laser-radiated micro-structures in shape of holes and slots were created on the rake face of cutting tools. Their machining performance was observed over the range of cutting speed and compared to unstructured cutting tool. Machining factors such as cutting force, compression ratio, contact length and tool wear were selected as a criterion of performance. Wide range of orthogonal cutting experiments was performed to identify shapes of micro-structures that can bring elevated results in mechanical machining. Sticking and sliding contact characterization were executed. For the greater advantage, the assessment of machinability rating has also been taken under consideration. It was found that the end goal (better performance or reduced energy consumption) of mechanical machining process is associated with structure shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fahad M (2012) A hear partition investigation of multilayer coated carbide tools for high speed machining through experimental studies and finite element modelling. The Univeristy of Manchester, Mancheste

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sadik MI, Lindström B (1995) The effect of restricted contact length on tool performance. J Mater Process Technol 48(1):275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)01659-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatima A, Whitehead DJ, Mativenga PT (2014) Femtosecond laser surface structuring of carbide tooling for modifying contact phenomena. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 228(11):1325–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413518516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koshy P, Tovey J (2011) Performance of electrical discharge textured cutting tools. CIRP Ann 60(1):153–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ze W, Jianxin D, Yang C, Youqiang X, Jun Z (2012) Performance of the self-lubricating textured tools in dry cutting of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9):943–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3853-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lei S, Devarajan S, Chang Z (2009) A study of micropool lubricated cutting tool in machining of mild steel. J Mater Process Technol 209(3):1612–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Obikawa T, Kamio A, Takaoka H, Osada A (2011) Micro-texture at the coated tool face for high performance cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2009) Development of a cutting tool with a nano/micro-textured surface—Improvement of anti-adhesive effect by considering the texture patterns. Precis Eng 33(4):425–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M’Saoubi R, Chandrasekaran H (2005) Innovative methods for the investigation of tool-chip adhesion and layer formation during machining. CIRP Ann 54(1):59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60049-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enomoto T, Sugihara T (2010) Improving anti-adhesive properties of cutting tool surfaces by nano-/micro-textures. CIRP Ann 59(1):597–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DM, Bajpai V, Kim BH, Park HW (2015) Finite element modeling of hard turning process via a micro-textured tool. Int J Adv Manuf Techno 78(9):1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6747-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawasegi N, Sugimori H, Morimoto H, Morita N, Hori I (2009) Development of cutting tools with microscale and nanoscale textures to improve frictional behavior. Precis Eng 33(3):248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie J, Luo MJ, Wu KK, Yang LF, Li DH (2013) Experimental study on cutting temperature and cutting force in dry turning of titanium alloy using a non-coated micro-grooved tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 73:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fatima A, Mativenga PT (2013) Assessment of tool rake surface structure geometry for enhanced contact phenomena. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1):771–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5079-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kümmel J, Braun D, Gibmeier J, Schneider J, Greiner C, Schulze V, Wanner A (2015) Study on micro texturing of uncoated cemented carbide cutting tools for wear improvement and built-up edge stabilisation. J Mater Process Technol 215:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fatima A, Mativenga PT (2017) On the comparative cutting performance of nature-inspired structured cutting tool in dry cutting of AISI/SAE 4140. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 231(11):1941–1948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415617930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Chapter 3—The essential features of metal cutting. In: Trent EM, Wright PK (eds) metal cutting, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, pp 21–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067069-2/50005-X

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mativenga PT, Abukhshim NA, Sheikh MA, Hon BKK (2006) An investigation of tool chip contact phenomena in high-speed turning using coated tools. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 220(5):657–667. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054jem351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fatima A, Mativenga PT (2015) A comparative study on cutting performance of rake-flank face structured cutting tool in orthogonal cutting of AISI/SAE 4140. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(9):2097–2106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6799-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arslan A, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Varman M, Mufti RA, Mosarof MH, Khuong LS, Quazi MM (2016) Surface texture manufacturing techniques and tribological effect of surface texturing on cutting tool performance: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 41(6):447–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2016.1186597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Astakhov VP, Shvets S (2004) The assessment of plastic deformation in metal cutting. J Mater Process Technol 146(2):193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadik MI, Lindström B (1993) The role of tool-chip contact length in metal cutting. J Mater Process Technol 37(1):613–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(93)90122-M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Chapter 4—Forces and stresses in metal cutting. In: Trent EM, Wright PK (eds) Metal cutting, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, pp 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067069-2/50006-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Bahi S, Nouari M, Moufki A, El Mansori M, Molinari A (2011) A new friction law for sticking and sliding contacts in machining. Tribol Int 44(7):764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fatima A, Mativenga PT (2014) Performance of flank face structured cutting tools in machining of AISI/SAE 4140 over a range of cutting speeds. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 230(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414555589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Iqbal SA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2008) A comparative study of the tool–chip contact length in turning of two engineering alloys for a wide range of cutting speeds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1582-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Venkata Rao K, Murthy BSN, Mohan Rao N (2014) Prediction of cutting tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece in boring of AISI 316 steel with artificial neural network. Measurement 51:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boubekri N, Rodriguez J, Asfour S (2003) Development of an aggregate indicator to assess the machinability of steels. J Mater Process Technol 134(2):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00446-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anis Fatima.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Lincoln Cardoso Brandao.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatima, A., Zaheer, A. & Fahad, M. Comparative performance analysis of micro-structured carbide inserts in machining of EN19 alloy steel. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1919-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1919-0

Keywords

Navigation