Abstract
Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) plays a main role in many industrial applications, especially in highpowered electronics cooling systems and providing the thermal energy demand when the energy supply is unavailable. In this study, the LHTES cycle process, including successive melting and solidification, investigates in a twodimensional annular space of a square cavity filled with nanomaterial of paraffin–alumina as a nanoPCM. In the melting process, all sidewalls of the cavity are insulated. Meanwhile, a constant heat rate generates homogeneously within the central heat source. At the end of melting, the heat generation gets off, while a timereducing temperature lower than the paraffin melting point imposes on the sidewalls, and then, solidification triggers. The numerical simulation was accomplished using control volume method and the governing equations solved using the SIMPLE algorithm. The enthalpyporosity method was employed to model the phasechange front. The value of thermal conductivity and the viscosity of the nanofluid have been experimentally measured before the numerical modeling. In this study, the effect of volume fraction of nanoparticles (0–0.03) has been investigated on the successive melting and solidification rate for a constant Rayleigh number of 5.74 × 10^{5}. The results show that adding nanoparticles to the PCM equal to the volume fractions of 0.01 and 0.02 improves melting rate, but the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.03 represents a poor heat transfer rate during melting even weaker than those for nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.01. It also observed that the nanomaterial with the volume fraction of φ = 0.03 represents the highest solidification rate. However, taking the overall performance of successive melting and solidification system into account, the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.02 remarked the most effective heat transfer rate in comparison with the other examined cases.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.Abbreviations
 b :

Enthalpyporosity coefficient (kg m^{−3} s^{−1})
 B :

Dimensionless enthalpyporosity coefficient
 B _{z} :

Boltzmann constant
 c :

Specific heat (J kg^{−1} K^{−1})
 f :

Liquid fraction
 g :

Gravity (m s^{−2})
 h :

Enthalpy (J kg^{−1} K^{−1})
 L, l :

Cavity and heat source dimension (m)
 k :

Thermal conductivity (W m^{−1} K^{−1})
 Nu :

Nusselt number, \( k_{\text{nf}} /k_{\text{f}} (T_{\text{s}}  T_{\text{m}} )\partial T/\partial n\)
 p :

Pressure (N m^{−2})
 P :

Dimensionless pressure
 Pr :

Prandtl number, \(Pr = \nu_{\text{f}} /\alpha_{\text{f}}\)
 q′″:

Heat generation rate (W m^{−3})
 Ra :

Rayleigh number, \(g\beta_{\text{f}} q^{{{\prime \prime \prime }}} l^{5} /\nu_{\text{f}} \alpha_{\text{f}} k_{\text{s}}\)
 Ste :

Stefan number, \(c_{\text{f}} q^{{{\prime \prime \prime }}} l^{2} /h_{\text{nf}} k_{\text{s}}\)
 T :

Temperature (K)
 T _{m}, T _{s} :

Melting and solidification points (K)
 T _{h}, T _{c} :

Hot and cold temperatures (K)
 t :

Time (s)
 u, v :

Velocity in the x, y direction (m s^{−1})
 U, V :

Dimensionless velocity
 x, y :

Cartesian coordinate (m)
 X, Y :

Dimensionless Cartesian coordinate
 CLF:

Cavity liquid fraction
 PCM:

Phasechange material
 NePCM:

Nanoenhanced PCM
 α :

Thermal diffusivity (m^{2} s^{−1})
 β :

Expansion coefficient (K^{−1})
 μ :

Dynamic viscosity (N s m^{−2})
 ν :

Kinematic viscosity (m^{2} s^{−1})
 θ :

Dimensionless temperature
 ρ :

Density (kg m^{−3})
 ϕ :

Volume fraction
 σ :

Electrical conduction (S m^{−1})
 τ:

Dimensionless time
 f, s:

Fluid and solid
 m:

Melting point
 nf:

Fluid PCM with nanoparticles
 ns:

Solid PCM with nanoparticles
 np:

Nanoparticles
References
Alva G, Liu L, Huang X, Fang G (2017) Thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar energy applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:693–706
Py X, Azoumah Y, Olives R (2013) Concentrated solar power: current technologies, major innovative issues and applicability to West African countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:306–315
Agyenim F, Hewitt N, Eames P, Smyth M (2010) A review of materials, heat transfer and phase change problem formulation for latent heat thermal energy storage systems (LHTESS). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:615–628
De Souza S, Vielmo HA (2005) Numerical analysis of water melting and solidification in the interior of tubes. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 27:119–131
Tian Y, Zhao CY (2013) A review of solar collectors and thermal energy storage in solar thermal applications. Appl Energy 104:538–553
Xu B, Li P, Chan C (2015) Application of phase change materials for thermal energy storage in concentrated solar thermal power plants: a review to recent developments. Appl Energy 160:286–307
Jourabian M, Farhadi M, Darzi AR (2012) Simulation of natural convection melting in an inclined cavity using lattice Boltzmann method. Sci Iran 19:1066–1073
Babapoor A, Karimi G (2015) Thermal properties measurement and heat storage analysis of paraffinnanoparticles composites phase change material: comparison and optimization. Appl Therm Eng 90:945–951
Khodadadi J, Hosseinizadeh S (2007) Nanoparticleenhanced phase change materials (NEPCM) with great potential for improved thermal energy storage. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 34:534–543
Hu N, Zhu ZQ, Li ZR, Tu J, Fan LW (2018) Closecontact melting heat transfer on a heated horizontal plate: revisited in the presence of nanoenhanced phase change materials (NePCM). Int J Heat Mass Transf 124:794–799
Sheikholeslami M (2018) Numerical simulation for solidification in a LHTESS by means of Nanoenhanced PCM. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 86:25–41
Iachachene F, Haddad Z, Oztop HF, AbuNada E (2019) Melting of phase change materials in a trapezoidal cavity: Orientation and nanoparticles effects. J Mol Liq 318:441–450
Sheikholeslami M, Mahian O (2019) Enhancement of PCM solidification using inorganic nanoparticles and an external magnetic field with application in energy storage systems. J Clean Prod 215:963–977
Dadvand A, Boukani NH, Dawoodian M (2018) Numerical simulation of the melting of a NePCM due to a heated thin plate with different positions in a square enclosure. Therm Sci Eng Prog 7:248–266
Feng Y, Li H, Li L, Bu L, Wang T (2015) Numerical investigation on the melting of nanoparticleenhanced phase change materials (NEPCM) in a bottomheated rectangular cavity using lattice Boltzmann method. Int J Heat Mass Transf 81:415–425
Arıcı M, Tütüncü E, Kan M, Karabay H (2017) Melting of nanoparticleenhanced paraffin wax in a rectangular enclosure with partially active walls. Int J Heat Mass Transf 104:7–17
Sebti SS, Mastiani M, Mirzaei H, Dadvand A, Kashani S, Hosseini SA (2013) Numerical study of the melting of nanoenhanced phase change material in a square cavity. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 14:307–316
Farsani RY, Raisi A, Nadooshan AA, Vanapalli S (2017) Does nanoparticles dispersed in a phase change material improve melting characteristics? Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 89:219–229
Darzi AR, Farhadi M, Jourabian M (2013) Lattice Boltzmann simulation of heat transfer enhancement during melting by using nanoparticles. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 37:23
Boukani NH, Dadvand A, Chamkha AJ (2018) Melting of a Nanoenhanced Phase Change Material (NePCM) in partiallyfilled horizontal elliptical capsules with different aspect ratios. Int J Mech Sci 149:164–177
Kashani S, Ranjbar A, Madani M, Mastiani M, Jalaly H (2013) Numerical study of solidification of a nanoenhanced phase change material (NEPCM) in a thermal storage system. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 54:702–712
Khodadadi J, Fan L (2009) Expedited freezing of nanoparticleenhanced phase change materials (NEPCM) exhibited through a simple 1D stefan problem formulation. In: ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference, San Francisco, CA, July, 2009, pp 19–23
Maxwell JC (1881) A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Kumar S, Bhoopal RS, Sharma PK, Beniwal RS, Singh R (2011) Nonlinear effect of volume fraction of inclusions on the effective thermal conductivity of composite materials: a modified Maxwell model. Open J Compos Mater 1:10
Vand V (1948) Viscosity of solutions and suspensions. I. Theory. J Phys Chem 52:277–299
Mózes G (1983) Paraffin products. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Arasu AV, Mujumdar AS (2012) Numerical study on melting of paraffin wax with Al_{2}O_{3} in a square enclosure. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 39:8–16
Hammerschmidt U, Sabuga W (2000) Transient hot wire (THW) method: uncertainty assessment. Int J Thermophys 21:1255–1278
Shahsavar A, Bahiraei M (2017) Experimental investigation and modeling of thermal conductivity and viscosity for nonNewtonian hybrid nanofluid containing coated CNT/Fe_{3}O_{4} nanoparticles. Powder Technol 318:441–450
Brent A, Voller V, Reid K (1988) Enthalpyporosity technique for modeling convectiondiffusion phase change: application to the melting of a pure metal. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 13:297–318
Hunter L, Kuttler J (1989) The enthalpy method for heat conduction problems with moving boundaries. J Heat Transf Trans ASME 111:239–242
Zerroukat M, Chatwin CR (1994) Computational moving boundary problems. Research Studies Press, Baldock
Patankar S (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Voller V, Swaminathan C, Thomas BG (1990) Fixed grid techniques for phase change problems: a review. Int J Numer Methods Eng 30:875–898
Date A (1991) A strong enthalpy formulation for the Stefan problem. Int J Heat Mass Transf 34:2231–2235
Gau C, Viskanta R (1986) Melting and solidification of a pure metal on a vertical wall. J Heat Transf 108:174–181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Technical Editor: Francis HR Franca, Ph.D.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yadollahi Farsani, R., Raisi, A. & Mahmoudi, A. Successive melting and solidification of paraffin–alumina nanomaterial in a cavity as a latent heat thermal energy storage. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 368 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s4043001918598
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s4043001918598