Advertisement

Bearing failure and influence factors analysis of metal-to-composite bolted joints at high temperature

  • Salam Abdus
  • Xiaoquan ChengEmail author
  • Wenjun Huang
  • Altaf Ahmed
  • Renwei Hu
Technical Paper
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, experiments were conducted to study the tensile performance of metal-to-composite bolted joints at room temperature and 250 °C. Furthermore, numerical models were developed to simulate tensile behavior of the joint. After achieving a decent validation between numerical models and experimental results, more detailed studies were conducted through finite element models to find out the influence of temperature, bolt material, the thickness of composite laminate and stacking sequence on tensile properties of the joint at room temperature and 250 °C. The research showed that temperature significantly affects the bearing strength of the joint. Around 42–50% decrease in bearing strength was observed at 250 °C as compared to room temperature. Stacking sequence variations have a little more effect on bearing strength at higher temperature than at room temperature. With the change of stacking sequences, around 11–24% variation in bearing strength was observed at 250 °C as compared to 8–20% at room temperature.

Keywords

Metal-to-composite bolted joint FEM Tensile performance Elevated temperature 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Baker A, Dutton S, Kelly D (2004) Composite materials for aircraft structures, 2nd edn. AIAA Inc., RestonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang S, Zhang J, Cheng X, Cheng Y, Zhang J, Huang W (2016) Effect of damage on failure mode of multi-bolt composite joints using failure envelope method. Compos Struct 160:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang S, Liu S, Liu P, Cheng X, Cheng Y (2015) Numerical analysis of bearing failure in countersunk composite joints using 3D explicit simulation method. Compos Struct 138:30–39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper C, Turvey GJ (1995) Effects of joint geometry and bolt torque on the structural performance of single bolt tension joints in pultruded GRP sheet material. Compos Struct 32(1–4):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chutima S, Blackie AP (1996) Effect of pitch distance, row spacing, end distance and bolt diameter on multi-fastened composite joints. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 27(2):105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park HJ (2001) Effects of stacking sequence and clamping force on the bearing strengths of mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. Compos Struct 53(2):213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baig Y, Cheng X, Hasham HJ, Abbas M, Khan WA (2016) Failure mechanisms of scarf-repaired composite laminates under tensile load. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38(7):2069–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gill R, Kumar V, Choudhary A (2014) Failure analysis of bolted composite joint—a review. Int J Eng Trends Technol 11(10):482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ascione F, Feo L, MacEri F (2010) On the pin-bearing failure load of GFRP bolted laminates: an experimental analysis on the influence of bolt diameter. Compos B Eng 41(6):482–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang SW, Cheng XQ, Guo X, Li X, Chen G (2016) Influence of lateral displacement of the grip on single lap composite-to-aluminum bolted joints. Exp Mech 56(3):407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sen F, Sayman O (2009) Experimental failure analysis of two-serial-bolted composite plates. J Appl Polym Sci 113(1):502–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou S, Wang Z, Zhou J, Wu X (2013) Experimental and numerical investigation on bolted composite joint made by vacuum assisted resin injection. Compos B Eng 45(1):1620–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy MA, McCarthy CT, Padhi GS (2006) A simple method for determining the effects of bolt-hole clearance on load distribution in single-column multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Struct 73(1):78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inal O, Balıkoglu F, Ataş A (2018) Bolted joints in quasi-unidirectional glass-fibre NCF composite laminates. Compos Struct 183:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar TVV, Shankar GSS, Shankar BL (2017) Experimental study on effect of stacking sequence, clearance and clamping torque on strength of FRP composite bolted joints. Mater Today Proc 4(10):10746–10750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zu S, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zhang J (2017) Effect of temperature and geometrical parameters on mechanical properties of pin-loaded fiber metal laminate joints. J Compos Mater 51(22):3163–3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang J, Xu J, Lu X, Hu N, Liu F, Zhao L (2017) An interpretation of the load distributions in highly torqued single-lap composite bolted joints with bolt-hole clearances. Compos B Eng 138:194–205Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chani KS, Saini JS, Bhunia H (2018) Effect of nanoclay and bolt preloads on the strength of bolted joints in glass epoxy nanocomposites. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(4):184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soykok IF, Sayman O, Ozen M, Korkmaz B (2013) Failure analysis of mechanically fastened glass fiber/epoxy composite joints under thermal effects. Compos B Eng 45(1):192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Turvey GJ, Sana A (2016) Pultruded GFRP double-lap single-bolt tension joints—temperature effects on mean and characteristic failure stresses and knock-down factors. Compos Struct 153:624–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kradinov V, Madenci E, Ambur DR (2007) Combined in-plane and through-the-thickness analysis for failure prediction of bolted composite joints. Compos Struct 77(2):127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang HS, Hung CL, Chang FK (1996) Bearing failure of bolted composite joints. Part I: experimental characterization. J Compos Mater 30(12):1284–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang J, Ma Z, Cheng X, Chen G (2012) Finite element model and load distribution analysis for three-bolted single-lap composite joints. Fuhe Cailiao Xuebao/Acta Mater Compos Sin 29(3):179–183Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tan SC, Perez J (1993) Progressive failure of laminates composites with a hole under compressive loading. Eng Fract Mech 45(4):529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang KY, Llu S, Chang FK, Liu S, Chang FK (1991) Damage tolerance of laminated composites containing an open hole and subjected to tensile loading. J Compos Mater 25(3):274–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsai SW, Wu EM (1972) A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. Tech Report AFMLGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hashin Z (1980) Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 47(2):329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Camanho PP, Matthews FL (1999) A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. J Compos Mater 33(24):2248–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tserpes KI, Labeas G, Papanikos P, Kermanidis T (2002) Strength prediction of bolted joints in graphite/epoxy composite laminates. Compos B Eng 33(7):521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tan SC (1991) A progressive failure model for composite laminates containing openings. J Compos Mater 25(5):556–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aeronautical Science and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Management Sciences and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.AVIC China Helicopter Research and Development InstituteJingdezhenChina

Personalised recommendations